A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives

Joseph D. Chisholm (Corresponding Author), Craig S. Chapman, Marvin Amm, Walter F. Bischof, Dan Smilek, Alan Kingstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test the cognitive ethology approach, which seeks to link cognitions and behaviours as they operate in everyday life with those studied in controlled lab-based investigations. Our test bed was the understanding of first-person and third-person perspectives, which in lab-based investigations have been defined in a diverse and multi-faceted manner. We hypothesized that because these lab-based investigations seek to connect with how first- and thirdperson perspective operates in everyday life, then either some of the divergent lab-based definitions are missing their mark or the everyday conceptualization of first- and third-person perspective is multi-faceted. Our investigation revealed the latter. By applying a cognitive ethology approach we were able to determine that a) peoples' everyday understanding of perspective is diverse yet reliable, and b) a lab-based investigation that applies these diverse understandings in a controlled setting can accurately predict how people will perform. These findings provide a 'proof of concept' for the cognitive ethology approach. Moreover, the present data demonstrate that previous lab-based studies, that often had very different understandings of first- and third-person perspective, were each in and of themselves valid. That is, each is capturing part of a broader understanding of perspective in everyday life. Our results also revealed a novel social factor not included in traditional conceptualizations of first-person third-perspective, that of eye gaze, i.e., eye contact is equated strongly with first-person perspective and the lack of eye-contact with third-person perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere92696
Number of pages10
JournalPloS ONE
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Ethology
animal behavior
eyes
Cognition
cognition
testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Chisholm, J. D., Chapman, C. S., Amm, M., Bischof, W. F., Smilek, D., & Kingstone, A. (2014). A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives. PloS ONE, 9(3), [e92696]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092696

A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives. / Chisholm, Joseph D. (Corresponding Author); Chapman, Craig S.; Amm, Marvin; Bischof, Walter F.; Smilek, Dan; Kingstone, Alan.

In: PloS ONE, Vol. 9, No. 3, e92696, 26.03.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chisholm, JD, Chapman, CS, Amm, M, Bischof, WF, Smilek, D & Kingstone, A 2014, 'A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives', PloS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, e92696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092696
Chisholm JD, Chapman CS, Amm M, Bischof WF, Smilek D, Kingstone A. A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives. PloS ONE. 2014 Mar 26;9(3). e92696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092696
Chisholm, Joseph D. ; Chapman, Craig S. ; Amm, Marvin ; Bischof, Walter F. ; Smilek, Dan ; Kingstone, Alan. / A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives. In: PloS ONE. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 3.
@article{a63512a7b24b4330b4a945c5405d85b2,
title = "A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives",
abstract = "The aim of the present study was to test the cognitive ethology approach, which seeks to link cognitions and behaviours as they operate in everyday life with those studied in controlled lab-based investigations. Our test bed was the understanding of first-person and third-person perspectives, which in lab-based investigations have been defined in a diverse and multi-faceted manner. We hypothesized that because these lab-based investigations seek to connect with how first- and thirdperson perspective operates in everyday life, then either some of the divergent lab-based definitions are missing their mark or the everyday conceptualization of first- and third-person perspective is multi-faceted. Our investigation revealed the latter. By applying a cognitive ethology approach we were able to determine that a) peoples' everyday understanding of perspective is diverse yet reliable, and b) a lab-based investigation that applies these diverse understandings in a controlled setting can accurately predict how people will perform. These findings provide a 'proof of concept' for the cognitive ethology approach. Moreover, the present data demonstrate that previous lab-based studies, that often had very different understandings of first- and third-person perspective, were each in and of themselves valid. That is, each is capturing part of a broader understanding of perspective in everyday life. Our results also revealed a novel social factor not included in traditional conceptualizations of first-person third-perspective, that of eye gaze, i.e., eye contact is equated strongly with first-person perspective and the lack of eye-contact with third-person perspective.",
author = "Chisholm, {Joseph D.} and Chapman, {Craig S.} and Marvin Amm and Bischof, {Walter F.} and Dan Smilek and Alan Kingstone",
note = "The present investigation was funded by a grant awarded to AK by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0092696",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "PloS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives

AU - Chisholm, Joseph D.

AU - Chapman, Craig S.

AU - Amm, Marvin

AU - Bischof, Walter F.

AU - Smilek, Dan

AU - Kingstone, Alan

N1 - The present investigation was funded by a grant awarded to AK by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

PY - 2014/3/26

Y1 - 2014/3/26

N2 - The aim of the present study was to test the cognitive ethology approach, which seeks to link cognitions and behaviours as they operate in everyday life with those studied in controlled lab-based investigations. Our test bed was the understanding of first-person and third-person perspectives, which in lab-based investigations have been defined in a diverse and multi-faceted manner. We hypothesized that because these lab-based investigations seek to connect with how first- and thirdperson perspective operates in everyday life, then either some of the divergent lab-based definitions are missing their mark or the everyday conceptualization of first- and third-person perspective is multi-faceted. Our investigation revealed the latter. By applying a cognitive ethology approach we were able to determine that a) peoples' everyday understanding of perspective is diverse yet reliable, and b) a lab-based investigation that applies these diverse understandings in a controlled setting can accurately predict how people will perform. These findings provide a 'proof of concept' for the cognitive ethology approach. Moreover, the present data demonstrate that previous lab-based studies, that often had very different understandings of first- and third-person perspective, were each in and of themselves valid. That is, each is capturing part of a broader understanding of perspective in everyday life. Our results also revealed a novel social factor not included in traditional conceptualizations of first-person third-perspective, that of eye gaze, i.e., eye contact is equated strongly with first-person perspective and the lack of eye-contact with third-person perspective.

AB - The aim of the present study was to test the cognitive ethology approach, which seeks to link cognitions and behaviours as they operate in everyday life with those studied in controlled lab-based investigations. Our test bed was the understanding of first-person and third-person perspectives, which in lab-based investigations have been defined in a diverse and multi-faceted manner. We hypothesized that because these lab-based investigations seek to connect with how first- and thirdperson perspective operates in everyday life, then either some of the divergent lab-based definitions are missing their mark or the everyday conceptualization of first- and third-person perspective is multi-faceted. Our investigation revealed the latter. By applying a cognitive ethology approach we were able to determine that a) peoples' everyday understanding of perspective is diverse yet reliable, and b) a lab-based investigation that applies these diverse understandings in a controlled setting can accurately predict how people will perform. These findings provide a 'proof of concept' for the cognitive ethology approach. Moreover, the present data demonstrate that previous lab-based studies, that often had very different understandings of first- and third-person perspective, were each in and of themselves valid. That is, each is capturing part of a broader understanding of perspective in everyday life. Our results also revealed a novel social factor not included in traditional conceptualizations of first-person third-perspective, that of eye gaze, i.e., eye contact is equated strongly with first-person perspective and the lack of eye-contact with third-person perspective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899909572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0092696

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0092696

M3 - Article

C2 - 24671136

AN - SCOPUS:84899909572

VL - 9

JO - PloS ONE

JF - PloS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e92696

ER -