A comparative study of mentoring for new teachers

Rachel K Shanks* (Corresponding Author), Michelle Attard Tonna, Frede Krøjgaard, Karen Annette Paaske, Dean Robson, Eva Bjerkholt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Teacher shortages and retention problems occur globally. This paper explores support for Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs), in particular the role of mentoring. Reasons for mentoring NQTs include combating isolation and fostering collaboration, enhancing professional practice and retaining teachers in the profession. Three different national environments are compared, with teacher induction programmes at national and local levels providing support for NQTs. We contrast the situation in Scotland, an early adopter of a national teacher induction scheme (2002), with that of Malta where an induction programme has been in place since 2010 and Denmark where there is no national scheme, but some support may be organised at a municipal or school level. In all three countries challenges were found in the enactment of mentoring such as having time for observation and feedback but also in terms of how to mentor. Based on our findings we propose that both mentors and NQTs need time away from their teaching commitments to devote to their mentoring relationship. Furthermore, it would appear from our analysis that while a national induction scheme is important to promote the induction of NQTs, support for the transition into the teaching profession also depends on the individual school context.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages15
JournalProfessional Development in Education
Early online date9 Apr 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Apr 2020

Keywords

  • comparative research
  • mentoring
  • newly qualified teachers
  • teacher induction
  • IMPACT
  • NEWLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
  • Comparative research
  • PERSPECTIVES
  • OWN
  • SCHOOLS
  • INDUCTION
  • BEGINNING TEACHERS

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of mentoring for new teachers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this