A comparison of forest and moorland stream microclimate, heat exchanges and thermal dynamics

David M. Hannah, Iain A. Malcolm, Chris Soulsby, Alan F. Youngson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the importance of riparian forest in moderating stream temperature variability is recognized, most previous research focuses on conifer harvesting effects and summer maximum temperature with highly variable findings. This article compares stream temperature, microclimate and heat exchange dynamics between semi-natural forest and moorland (no trees) reaches in the Scottish Cairngorms over two calendar years to provide a longer-term perspective. Mean daily water column temperature is warmer for moorland than forest in late winter-early spring, but cooler in summer. Daily water column temperature range is greater for moorland than forest. Streambed temperature dynamics are markedly different between reaches, reflecting contrasting groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) interactions. Mean, minimum and maximum daily air temperature is cooler, humidity is lower, and wind speed is Much higher for moorland than forest on average. Net radiation is the dominant heat sink in autumn-winter and major heat source in spring-summer for moorland and summer for forest. Net radiation is greater in summer and lower in winter for moorland than forest. Sensible heat is an energy source in autumn-winter and sink in spring-summer, with loss (gain) greater in Summer (winter) for moorland than forest. Latent heat is predominantly a sink for both reaches, with magnitude and variability higher for moorland than forest. Streambed heat flux is much smaller than fluxes at the air-water interface, with moorland and forest illustrating seasonal and between-reach differences attributable to different GW-SW interactions. Seasonal patterns in stream energy budget partitioning are illustrated schematically. To our knowledge, this is the first such study of mixed woodland, which generates notably different results to work on coniferous forest. This research provides a process basis to model stream thermal impact of changes in forest practice, and so inform decision making by land and water resource managers. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)919-940
Number of pages22
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume22
Issue number7
Early online date28 Feb 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2008

Keywords

  • water temperature
  • riverbed
  • thermal regime
  • energy balance
  • heat budget
  • hydrometeorology
  • riparian woodland
  • Cairngorms
  • Scotland
  • surface water interactions
  • temperature response
  • British-Columbia
  • hyporheic zone
  • clear-cut
  • survival
  • regime
  • variability
  • catchment
  • gradients

Cite this

A comparison of forest and moorland stream microclimate, heat exchanges and thermal dynamics. / Hannah, David M.; Malcolm, Iain A.; Soulsby, Chris; Youngson, Alan F.

In: Hydrological Processes, Vol. 22, No. 7, 30.03.2008, p. 919-940.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hannah, David M. ; Malcolm, Iain A. ; Soulsby, Chris ; Youngson, Alan F. / A comparison of forest and moorland stream microclimate, heat exchanges and thermal dynamics. In: Hydrological Processes. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 7. pp. 919-940.
@article{eeb651bfa27b42cd97abb419f3c689c1,
title = "A comparison of forest and moorland stream microclimate, heat exchanges and thermal dynamics",
abstract = "Although the importance of riparian forest in moderating stream temperature variability is recognized, most previous research focuses on conifer harvesting effects and summer maximum temperature with highly variable findings. This article compares stream temperature, microclimate and heat exchange dynamics between semi-natural forest and moorland (no trees) reaches in the Scottish Cairngorms over two calendar years to provide a longer-term perspective. Mean daily water column temperature is warmer for moorland than forest in late winter-early spring, but cooler in summer. Daily water column temperature range is greater for moorland than forest. Streambed temperature dynamics are markedly different between reaches, reflecting contrasting groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) interactions. Mean, minimum and maximum daily air temperature is cooler, humidity is lower, and wind speed is Much higher for moorland than forest on average. Net radiation is the dominant heat sink in autumn-winter and major heat source in spring-summer for moorland and summer for forest. Net radiation is greater in summer and lower in winter for moorland than forest. Sensible heat is an energy source in autumn-winter and sink in spring-summer, with loss (gain) greater in Summer (winter) for moorland than forest. Latent heat is predominantly a sink for both reaches, with magnitude and variability higher for moorland than forest. Streambed heat flux is much smaller than fluxes at the air-water interface, with moorland and forest illustrating seasonal and between-reach differences attributable to different GW-SW interactions. Seasonal patterns in stream energy budget partitioning are illustrated schematically. To our knowledge, this is the first such study of mixed woodland, which generates notably different results to work on coniferous forest. This research provides a process basis to model stream thermal impact of changes in forest practice, and so inform decision making by land and water resource managers. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "water temperature, riverbed, thermal regime, energy balance, heat budget, hydrometeorology, riparian woodland, Cairngorms, Scotland, surface water interactions, temperature response, British-Columbia, hyporheic zone, clear-cut, survival, regime, variability, catchment, gradients",
author = "Hannah, {David M.} and Malcolm, {Iain A.} and Chris Soulsby and Youngson, {Alan F.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/hyp.7003",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "919--940",
journal = "Hydrological Processes",
issn = "0885-6087",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of forest and moorland stream microclimate, heat exchanges and thermal dynamics

AU - Hannah, David M.

AU - Malcolm, Iain A.

AU - Soulsby, Chris

AU - Youngson, Alan F.

PY - 2008/3/30

Y1 - 2008/3/30

N2 - Although the importance of riparian forest in moderating stream temperature variability is recognized, most previous research focuses on conifer harvesting effects and summer maximum temperature with highly variable findings. This article compares stream temperature, microclimate and heat exchange dynamics between semi-natural forest and moorland (no trees) reaches in the Scottish Cairngorms over two calendar years to provide a longer-term perspective. Mean daily water column temperature is warmer for moorland than forest in late winter-early spring, but cooler in summer. Daily water column temperature range is greater for moorland than forest. Streambed temperature dynamics are markedly different between reaches, reflecting contrasting groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) interactions. Mean, minimum and maximum daily air temperature is cooler, humidity is lower, and wind speed is Much higher for moorland than forest on average. Net radiation is the dominant heat sink in autumn-winter and major heat source in spring-summer for moorland and summer for forest. Net radiation is greater in summer and lower in winter for moorland than forest. Sensible heat is an energy source in autumn-winter and sink in spring-summer, with loss (gain) greater in Summer (winter) for moorland than forest. Latent heat is predominantly a sink for both reaches, with magnitude and variability higher for moorland than forest. Streambed heat flux is much smaller than fluxes at the air-water interface, with moorland and forest illustrating seasonal and between-reach differences attributable to different GW-SW interactions. Seasonal patterns in stream energy budget partitioning are illustrated schematically. To our knowledge, this is the first such study of mixed woodland, which generates notably different results to work on coniferous forest. This research provides a process basis to model stream thermal impact of changes in forest practice, and so inform decision making by land and water resource managers. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Although the importance of riparian forest in moderating stream temperature variability is recognized, most previous research focuses on conifer harvesting effects and summer maximum temperature with highly variable findings. This article compares stream temperature, microclimate and heat exchange dynamics between semi-natural forest and moorland (no trees) reaches in the Scottish Cairngorms over two calendar years to provide a longer-term perspective. Mean daily water column temperature is warmer for moorland than forest in late winter-early spring, but cooler in summer. Daily water column temperature range is greater for moorland than forest. Streambed temperature dynamics are markedly different between reaches, reflecting contrasting groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) interactions. Mean, minimum and maximum daily air temperature is cooler, humidity is lower, and wind speed is Much higher for moorland than forest on average. Net radiation is the dominant heat sink in autumn-winter and major heat source in spring-summer for moorland and summer for forest. Net radiation is greater in summer and lower in winter for moorland than forest. Sensible heat is an energy source in autumn-winter and sink in spring-summer, with loss (gain) greater in Summer (winter) for moorland than forest. Latent heat is predominantly a sink for both reaches, with magnitude and variability higher for moorland than forest. Streambed heat flux is much smaller than fluxes at the air-water interface, with moorland and forest illustrating seasonal and between-reach differences attributable to different GW-SW interactions. Seasonal patterns in stream energy budget partitioning are illustrated schematically. To our knowledge, this is the first such study of mixed woodland, which generates notably different results to work on coniferous forest. This research provides a process basis to model stream thermal impact of changes in forest practice, and so inform decision making by land and water resource managers. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KW - water temperature

KW - riverbed

KW - thermal regime

KW - energy balance

KW - heat budget

KW - hydrometeorology

KW - riparian woodland

KW - Cairngorms

KW - Scotland

KW - surface water interactions

KW - temperature response

KW - British-Columbia

KW - hyporheic zone

KW - clear-cut

KW - survival

KW - regime

KW - variability

KW - catchment

KW - gradients

U2 - 10.1002/hyp.7003

DO - 10.1002/hyp.7003

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 919

EP - 940

JO - Hydrological Processes

JF - Hydrological Processes

SN - 0885-6087

IS - 7

ER -