A comparison of professional and private time preferences of General Practitioners

Alastair Irvine (Corresponding Author), Marjon Van der Pol, Euan Phimister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In a perfect agency relationship, doctors consider all information and select the patient's ‘utility maximising’ option given the patient's preferences. The patient's time preferences are important as treatments vary in the timing and length of their benefits. However, doctors often do not have full information on patients' preferences and may apply their own preferences. This has generated empirical interest in estimating doctors' time preferences. However, these studies generally elicit doctors' private preferences (preferences for their own health) rather than professional preferences (preferences for the patient). We hypothesise that private and professional preferences may differ. Professional time preferences may be ‘taught’ in medical school or learned through repeated interactions with patients. If preferences differ then estimates of doctors' private preferences are less informative for medical decision-making. This study compares private and professional time preferences for health in a national sample of General Practitioners, using a between sample design. Time discounting is explored using exponential and quasi-hyperbolic models. We elicit time preferences using multiple price lists. We find no significant difference between the time preference for the self or the patient. This result holds for axiomatic discounting classification and maximum likelihood estimates. We do not find evidence of present-bias. There are a high proportion of increasingly impatient GPs, potentially implying a maximum ‘willingness to wait’ for treatment benefits. GPs value the health state differently between themselves or for a patient. These results suggest that we can use estimates of private preferences from doctors to inform medical decision-making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-264
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume222
Early online date12 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

general practitioner
General Practitioners
Patient Preference
Health
Likelihood Functions
time
Medical Schools
Doctors
health
decision making
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • time preferences
  • agency
  • doctors

Cite this

A comparison of professional and private time preferences of General Practitioners. / Irvine, Alastair (Corresponding Author); Van der Pol, Marjon; Phimister, Euan.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 222, 01.02.2019, p. 256-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{485747cd6a0f47c19309c2c0b8609b29,
title = "A comparison of professional and private time preferences of General Practitioners",
abstract = "In a perfect agency relationship, doctors consider all information and select the patient's ‘utility maximising’ option given the patient's preferences. The patient's time preferences are important as treatments vary in the timing and length of their benefits. However, doctors often do not have full information on patients' preferences and may apply their own preferences. This has generated empirical interest in estimating doctors' time preferences. However, these studies generally elicit doctors' private preferences (preferences for their own health) rather than professional preferences (preferences for the patient). We hypothesise that private and professional preferences may differ. Professional time preferences may be ‘taught’ in medical school or learned through repeated interactions with patients. If preferences differ then estimates of doctors' private preferences are less informative for medical decision-making. This study compares private and professional time preferences for health in a national sample of General Practitioners, using a between sample design. Time discounting is explored using exponential and quasi-hyperbolic models. We elicit time preferences using multiple price lists. We find no significant difference between the time preference for the self or the patient. This result holds for axiomatic discounting classification and maximum likelihood estimates. We do not find evidence of present-bias. There are a high proportion of increasingly impatient GPs, potentially implying a maximum ‘willingness to wait’ for treatment benefits. GPs value the health state differently between themselves or for a patient. These results suggest that we can use estimates of private preferences from doctors to inform medical decision-making.",
keywords = "time preferences, agency, doctors",
author = "Alastair Irvine and {Van der Pol}, Marjon and Euan Phimister",
note = "The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates funds HERU. Alastair Irvine's PhD studentship was funded by the Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and not those of the funding body.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.014",
language = "English",
volume = "222",
pages = "256--264",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of professional and private time preferences of General Practitioners

AU - Irvine, Alastair

AU - Van der Pol, Marjon

AU - Phimister, Euan

N1 - The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates funds HERU. Alastair Irvine's PhD studentship was funded by the Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and not those of the funding body.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - In a perfect agency relationship, doctors consider all information and select the patient's ‘utility maximising’ option given the patient's preferences. The patient's time preferences are important as treatments vary in the timing and length of their benefits. However, doctors often do not have full information on patients' preferences and may apply their own preferences. This has generated empirical interest in estimating doctors' time preferences. However, these studies generally elicit doctors' private preferences (preferences for their own health) rather than professional preferences (preferences for the patient). We hypothesise that private and professional preferences may differ. Professional time preferences may be ‘taught’ in medical school or learned through repeated interactions with patients. If preferences differ then estimates of doctors' private preferences are less informative for medical decision-making. This study compares private and professional time preferences for health in a national sample of General Practitioners, using a between sample design. Time discounting is explored using exponential and quasi-hyperbolic models. We elicit time preferences using multiple price lists. We find no significant difference between the time preference for the self or the patient. This result holds for axiomatic discounting classification and maximum likelihood estimates. We do not find evidence of present-bias. There are a high proportion of increasingly impatient GPs, potentially implying a maximum ‘willingness to wait’ for treatment benefits. GPs value the health state differently between themselves or for a patient. These results suggest that we can use estimates of private preferences from doctors to inform medical decision-making.

AB - In a perfect agency relationship, doctors consider all information and select the patient's ‘utility maximising’ option given the patient's preferences. The patient's time preferences are important as treatments vary in the timing and length of their benefits. However, doctors often do not have full information on patients' preferences and may apply their own preferences. This has generated empirical interest in estimating doctors' time preferences. However, these studies generally elicit doctors' private preferences (preferences for their own health) rather than professional preferences (preferences for the patient). We hypothesise that private and professional preferences may differ. Professional time preferences may be ‘taught’ in medical school or learned through repeated interactions with patients. If preferences differ then estimates of doctors' private preferences are less informative for medical decision-making. This study compares private and professional time preferences for health in a national sample of General Practitioners, using a between sample design. Time discounting is explored using exponential and quasi-hyperbolic models. We elicit time preferences using multiple price lists. We find no significant difference between the time preference for the self or the patient. This result holds for axiomatic discounting classification and maximum likelihood estimates. We do not find evidence of present-bias. There are a high proportion of increasingly impatient GPs, potentially implying a maximum ‘willingness to wait’ for treatment benefits. GPs value the health state differently between themselves or for a patient. These results suggest that we can use estimates of private preferences from doctors to inform medical decision-making.

KW - time preferences

KW - agency

KW - doctors

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.014

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.014

M3 - Article

VL - 222

SP - 256

EP - 264

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -