A conflict management tool for conservation agencies

Juliette Claire Young*, Des B A Thompson, Peter Moore, Alastair Macgugan, Allan Watt, Stephen Mark Redpath

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Growing pressure on natural resources is leading to more conservation conflicts. Governments and their statutory agencies devote increasing financial and human resources to this subject, but tend to adopt reactive, ad hoc approaches to management. We combined theory and empirical data about five conservation conflicts in a transdisciplinary collaboration to co-develop a novel decision-making tool. This tool uses a systematic stepwise approach with six distinct decision stages: (i) establishing whether there is a conflict or an impact; (ii) understanding the context of the conflict, including the stakeholders affected; (iii) developing shared understanding of the conflict and goals; (iv) building a consensus on how to reach the goals; (v) implementing measures; and (vi) monitoring the outcomes. Policy implications. We argue this new tool has wide applicability and democratic legitimacy and offers an exciting and practical approach to improve the management of conservation conflicts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)705-711
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume53
Early online date8 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Fingerprint

conflict management
tool use
human resource
conflict
stakeholder
natural resource
decision making
monitoring

Keywords

  • Capercaillie
  • Conflict resolution
  • Framing
  • Mountain hare
  • Participation
  • Pine marten
  • Sawbill duck
  • Sea eagle
  • Trust
  • Urban gull

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Young, J. C., Thompson, D. B. A., Moore, P., Macgugan, A., Watt, A., & Redpath, S. M. (2016). A conflict management tool for conservation agencies. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53, 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12612

A conflict management tool for conservation agencies. / Young, Juliette Claire; Thompson, Des B A; Moore, Peter; Macgugan, Alastair; Watt, Allan; Redpath, Stephen Mark.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 53, 06.2016, p. 705-711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Young, JC, Thompson, DBA, Moore, P, Macgugan, A, Watt, A & Redpath, SM 2016, 'A conflict management tool for conservation agencies', Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 53, pp. 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12612
Young, Juliette Claire ; Thompson, Des B A ; Moore, Peter ; Macgugan, Alastair ; Watt, Allan ; Redpath, Stephen Mark. / A conflict management tool for conservation agencies. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2016 ; Vol. 53. pp. 705-711.
@article{97a683f832e24bc4a853a34b9212ad3e,
title = "A conflict management tool for conservation agencies",
abstract = "Growing pressure on natural resources is leading to more conservation conflicts. Governments and their statutory agencies devote increasing financial and human resources to this subject, but tend to adopt reactive, ad hoc approaches to management. We combined theory and empirical data about five conservation conflicts in a transdisciplinary collaboration to co-develop a novel decision-making tool. This tool uses a systematic stepwise approach with six distinct decision stages: (i) establishing whether there is a conflict or an impact; (ii) understanding the context of the conflict, including the stakeholders affected; (iii) developing shared understanding of the conflict and goals; (iv) building a consensus on how to reach the goals; (v) implementing measures; and (vi) monitoring the outcomes. Policy implications. We argue this new tool has wide applicability and democratic legitimacy and offers an exciting and practical approach to improve the management of conservation conflicts.",
keywords = "Capercaillie, Conflict resolution, Framing, Mountain hare, Participation, Pine marten, Sawbill duck, Sea eagle, Trust, Urban gull",
author = "Young, {Juliette Claire} and Thompson, {Des B A} and Peter Moore and Alastair Macgugan and Allan Watt and Redpath, {Stephen Mark}",
note = "Funded by •Scottish Natural Heritage. Grant Number: RGC2384, {"}MANAGING SPECIES CONFLICTS IN SCOTLAND{"}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.12612",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "705--711",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A conflict management tool for conservation agencies

AU - Young, Juliette Claire

AU - Thompson, Des B A

AU - Moore, Peter

AU - Macgugan, Alastair

AU - Watt, Allan

AU - Redpath, Stephen Mark

N1 - Funded by •Scottish Natural Heritage. Grant Number: RGC2384, "MANAGING SPECIES CONFLICTS IN SCOTLAND"

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Growing pressure on natural resources is leading to more conservation conflicts. Governments and their statutory agencies devote increasing financial and human resources to this subject, but tend to adopt reactive, ad hoc approaches to management. We combined theory and empirical data about five conservation conflicts in a transdisciplinary collaboration to co-develop a novel decision-making tool. This tool uses a systematic stepwise approach with six distinct decision stages: (i) establishing whether there is a conflict or an impact; (ii) understanding the context of the conflict, including the stakeholders affected; (iii) developing shared understanding of the conflict and goals; (iv) building a consensus on how to reach the goals; (v) implementing measures; and (vi) monitoring the outcomes. Policy implications. We argue this new tool has wide applicability and democratic legitimacy and offers an exciting and practical approach to improve the management of conservation conflicts.

AB - Growing pressure on natural resources is leading to more conservation conflicts. Governments and their statutory agencies devote increasing financial and human resources to this subject, but tend to adopt reactive, ad hoc approaches to management. We combined theory and empirical data about five conservation conflicts in a transdisciplinary collaboration to co-develop a novel decision-making tool. This tool uses a systematic stepwise approach with six distinct decision stages: (i) establishing whether there is a conflict or an impact; (ii) understanding the context of the conflict, including the stakeholders affected; (iii) developing shared understanding of the conflict and goals; (iv) building a consensus on how to reach the goals; (v) implementing measures; and (vi) monitoring the outcomes. Policy implications. We argue this new tool has wide applicability and democratic legitimacy and offers an exciting and practical approach to improve the management of conservation conflicts.

KW - Capercaillie

KW - Conflict resolution

KW - Framing

KW - Mountain hare

KW - Participation

KW - Pine marten

KW - Sawbill duck

KW - Sea eagle

KW - Trust

KW - Urban gull

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958817342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.12612

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.12612

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 705

EP - 711

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

ER -