A Consumer-Based Teleosemantics for Animal Signals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ethological theory standardly attributes representational content to animal signals. In this article I first assess whether Ruth Millikan’s teleosemantic theory accounts for the content of animal signals. I conclude that it does not, because many signals do not exhibit the required sort of cooperation between signal‐producing and signal‐consuming devices. It is then argued that Kim Sterelny’s proposal, while not requiring cooperation, sometimes yields the wrong content. Finally, I outline an alternative view, according to which consumers alone are responsible for conferring representational status and determining content. I suggest that consumer‐based teleosemantics reconstruct the content of both cooperative and noncooperative signals and explain how a given trait can mean different things to different consumers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)864-875
Number of pages12
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume76
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Animals
Teleosemantics
Representational Content

Cite this

A Consumer-Based Teleosemantics for Animal Signals. / Stegmann, Ulrich E. .

In: Philosophy of Science, Vol. 76, No. 5, 12.2009, p. 864-875.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f984ea3e1e2743a1a652e7c0f65668e0,
title = "A Consumer-Based Teleosemantics for Animal Signals",
abstract = "Ethological theory standardly attributes representational content to animal signals. In this article I first assess whether Ruth Millikan’s teleosemantic theory accounts for the content of animal signals. I conclude that it does not, because many signals do not exhibit the required sort of cooperation between signal‐producing and signal‐consuming devices. It is then argued that Kim Sterelny’s proposal, while not requiring cooperation, sometimes yields the wrong content. Finally, I outline an alternative view, according to which consumers alone are responsible for conferring representational status and determining content. I suggest that consumer‐based teleosemantics reconstruct the content of both cooperative and noncooperative signals and explain how a given trait can mean different things to different consumers.",
author = "Stegmann, {Ulrich E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1086/605820",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "864--875",
journal = "Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0031-8248",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Consumer-Based Teleosemantics for Animal Signals

AU - Stegmann, Ulrich E.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Ethological theory standardly attributes representational content to animal signals. In this article I first assess whether Ruth Millikan’s teleosemantic theory accounts for the content of animal signals. I conclude that it does not, because many signals do not exhibit the required sort of cooperation between signal‐producing and signal‐consuming devices. It is then argued that Kim Sterelny’s proposal, while not requiring cooperation, sometimes yields the wrong content. Finally, I outline an alternative view, according to which consumers alone are responsible for conferring representational status and determining content. I suggest that consumer‐based teleosemantics reconstruct the content of both cooperative and noncooperative signals and explain how a given trait can mean different things to different consumers.

AB - Ethological theory standardly attributes representational content to animal signals. In this article I first assess whether Ruth Millikan’s teleosemantic theory accounts for the content of animal signals. I conclude that it does not, because many signals do not exhibit the required sort of cooperation between signal‐producing and signal‐consuming devices. It is then argued that Kim Sterelny’s proposal, while not requiring cooperation, sometimes yields the wrong content. Finally, I outline an alternative view, according to which consumers alone are responsible for conferring representational status and determining content. I suggest that consumer‐based teleosemantics reconstruct the content of both cooperative and noncooperative signals and explain how a given trait can mean different things to different consumers.

U2 - 10.1086/605820

DO - 10.1086/605820

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 864

EP - 875

JO - Philosophy of Science

JF - Philosophy of Science

SN - 0031-8248

IS - 5

ER -