A dual-loop tracking control approach to precise nanopositioning

Mohammed Altaher, Douglas Russell, Sumeet S Aphale (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Nanopositioners are mechanical devices that can accurately move with a resolution in the nanometer scale. Due to their mechanical construction and the piezoelectric actuators popularly employed in nanopositioners, these devices have severe performance limitations due to resonance, hysteresis and creep. A number of techniques to control nanopositioners, both in open-loop and closed-loop, have been reported in the literature. Closed-loop techniques clearly outperform open-loop techniques due to several desirable characteristics, such as robustness, high-bandwidth, absence of the need for tuning and high stability, along with others. The most popular closed-loop control technique reported is one where a damping controller is first employed in an inner loop to damp the mechanical resonance of the nanopositioner, thereby increasing achievable bandwidth. Consequently, a tracking controller, typically an Integral controller or a proportional–integral controller, is implemented in the outer loop to enforce tracking of the reference signal, thereby reducing the positioning errors due to hysteresis and creep dynamics of the employed actuator. The most popular trajectory a nanopositioner is forced to track is a raster scan, which is generated by making one axis of the nanopositioner follow a triangular trajectory and the other follow a slow ramp or staircase. It is quite clear that a triangle wave (a finite velocity, zero acceleration signal) cannot be perfectly tracked by a first-order integrator and a double integrator is necessary to deliver error-free tracking. However, due to the phase profile of the damped closed-loop system, implementing a double integrator is difficult. This paper proposes a method by which to implement two integrators focused on the tracking performance. Criteria for gain selection, stability analysis, error analysis, simulations, and experimental results are provided. These demonstrate a reduction in positioning error by 50%, when compared to the traditional damping plus first-order integral tracking approach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)666-674
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Vibration and Control
Volume25
Issue number3
Early online date22 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Controllers
Hysteresis
Creep
Damping
Trajectories
Bandwidth
Piezoelectric actuators
Convergence of numerical methods
Closed loop systems
Error analysis
Actuators
Tuning

Keywords

  • nanopositioning
  • robustness
  • damping and tracking
  • error analysis

Cite this

A dual-loop tracking control approach to precise nanopositioning. / Altaher, Mohammed; Russell, Douglas; Aphale, Sumeet S (Corresponding Author).

In: Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.02.2019, p. 666-674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Altaher, Mohammed ; Russell, Douglas ; Aphale, Sumeet S. / A dual-loop tracking control approach to precise nanopositioning. In: Journal of Vibration and Control. 2019 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 666-674.
@article{962d83f79cae437abb9243cf8012fb4a,
title = "A dual-loop tracking control approach to precise nanopositioning",
abstract = "Nanopositioners are mechanical devices that can accurately move with a resolution in the nanometer scale. Due to their mechanical construction and the piezoelectric actuators popularly employed in nanopositioners, these devices have severe performance limitations due to resonance, hysteresis and creep. A number of techniques to control nanopositioners, both in open-loop and closed-loop, have been reported in the literature. Closed-loop techniques clearly outperform open-loop techniques due to several desirable characteristics, such as robustness, high-bandwidth, absence of the need for tuning and high stability, along with others. The most popular closed-loop control technique reported is one where a damping controller is first employed in an inner loop to damp the mechanical resonance of the nanopositioner, thereby increasing achievable bandwidth. Consequently, a tracking controller, typically an Integral controller or a proportional–integral controller, is implemented in the outer loop to enforce tracking of the reference signal, thereby reducing the positioning errors due to hysteresis and creep dynamics of the employed actuator. The most popular trajectory a nanopositioner is forced to track is a raster scan, which is generated by making one axis of the nanopositioner follow a triangular trajectory and the other follow a slow ramp or staircase. It is quite clear that a triangle wave (a finite velocity, zero acceleration signal) cannot be perfectly tracked by a first-order integrator and a double integrator is necessary to deliver error-free tracking. However, due to the phase profile of the damped closed-loop system, implementing a double integrator is difficult. This paper proposes a method by which to implement two integrators focused on the tracking performance. Criteria for gain selection, stability analysis, error analysis, simulations, and experimental results are provided. These demonstrate a reduction in positioning error by 50{\%}, when compared to the traditional damping plus first-order integral tracking approach.",
keywords = "nanopositioning, robustness, damping and tracking, error analysis",
author = "Mohammed Altaher and Douglas Russell and Aphale, {Sumeet S}",
note = "The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077546318793219",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "666--674",
journal = "Journal of Vibration and Control",
issn = "1077-5463",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A dual-loop tracking control approach to precise nanopositioning

AU - Altaher, Mohammed

AU - Russell, Douglas

AU - Aphale, Sumeet S

N1 - The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Nanopositioners are mechanical devices that can accurately move with a resolution in the nanometer scale. Due to their mechanical construction and the piezoelectric actuators popularly employed in nanopositioners, these devices have severe performance limitations due to resonance, hysteresis and creep. A number of techniques to control nanopositioners, both in open-loop and closed-loop, have been reported in the literature. Closed-loop techniques clearly outperform open-loop techniques due to several desirable characteristics, such as robustness, high-bandwidth, absence of the need for tuning and high stability, along with others. The most popular closed-loop control technique reported is one where a damping controller is first employed in an inner loop to damp the mechanical resonance of the nanopositioner, thereby increasing achievable bandwidth. Consequently, a tracking controller, typically an Integral controller or a proportional–integral controller, is implemented in the outer loop to enforce tracking of the reference signal, thereby reducing the positioning errors due to hysteresis and creep dynamics of the employed actuator. The most popular trajectory a nanopositioner is forced to track is a raster scan, which is generated by making one axis of the nanopositioner follow a triangular trajectory and the other follow a slow ramp or staircase. It is quite clear that a triangle wave (a finite velocity, zero acceleration signal) cannot be perfectly tracked by a first-order integrator and a double integrator is necessary to deliver error-free tracking. However, due to the phase profile of the damped closed-loop system, implementing a double integrator is difficult. This paper proposes a method by which to implement two integrators focused on the tracking performance. Criteria for gain selection, stability analysis, error analysis, simulations, and experimental results are provided. These demonstrate a reduction in positioning error by 50%, when compared to the traditional damping plus first-order integral tracking approach.

AB - Nanopositioners are mechanical devices that can accurately move with a resolution in the nanometer scale. Due to their mechanical construction and the piezoelectric actuators popularly employed in nanopositioners, these devices have severe performance limitations due to resonance, hysteresis and creep. A number of techniques to control nanopositioners, both in open-loop and closed-loop, have been reported in the literature. Closed-loop techniques clearly outperform open-loop techniques due to several desirable characteristics, such as robustness, high-bandwidth, absence of the need for tuning and high stability, along with others. The most popular closed-loop control technique reported is one where a damping controller is first employed in an inner loop to damp the mechanical resonance of the nanopositioner, thereby increasing achievable bandwidth. Consequently, a tracking controller, typically an Integral controller or a proportional–integral controller, is implemented in the outer loop to enforce tracking of the reference signal, thereby reducing the positioning errors due to hysteresis and creep dynamics of the employed actuator. The most popular trajectory a nanopositioner is forced to track is a raster scan, which is generated by making one axis of the nanopositioner follow a triangular trajectory and the other follow a slow ramp or staircase. It is quite clear that a triangle wave (a finite velocity, zero acceleration signal) cannot be perfectly tracked by a first-order integrator and a double integrator is necessary to deliver error-free tracking. However, due to the phase profile of the damped closed-loop system, implementing a double integrator is difficult. This paper proposes a method by which to implement two integrators focused on the tracking performance. Criteria for gain selection, stability analysis, error analysis, simulations, and experimental results are provided. These demonstrate a reduction in positioning error by 50%, when compared to the traditional damping plus first-order integral tracking approach.

KW - nanopositioning

KW - robustness

KW - damping and tracking

KW - error analysis

U2 - 10.1177/1077546318793219

DO - 10.1177/1077546318793219

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 666

EP - 674

JO - Journal of Vibration and Control

JF - Journal of Vibration and Control

SN - 1077-5463

IS - 3

ER -