A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures

Tania Lourenco, Adrian M Grant, Jennifer M Burr, Luke Vale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives
The introduction of new interventional procedures is less regulated than for other health technologies such as pharmaceuticals. Decisions are often taken on evidence of efficacy and short-term safety from small-scale usually observational studies. This reflects the particular challenges of evaluating interventional procedures – the extra facets of skill and training and the difficulty defining a ‘new’ technology. Currently, there is no framework to evaluate new interventional procedures before they become available in clinical practice as opposed to new pharmaceuticals. This paper proposes a framework to guide the evaluation of a new interventional procedure.

Proposed framework
A framework was developed consisting of a four-stage progressive evaluation for a new interventional procedure: Stage 1: Development; Stage 2: Efficacy and short-term safety; Stage 3: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness; and Stage 4: Implementation. The framework also suggests the types of studies or data collection methods that can be used to satisfy each stage.

Conclusions
This paper makes a first step on a framework for generating evidence on new interventional procedures. The difficulties and limitations of applying such a framework are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-40
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Policy
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Safety
Biomedical Technology
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Observational Studies
Technology

Keywords

  • equipment and supplies
  • evaluation studies as topic
  • Great Britain
  • humans
  • new interventional procedures
  • medical devices
  • evaluation
  • innovation
  • framework

Cite this

A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures. / Lourenco, Tania; Grant, Adrian M; Burr, Jennifer M; Vale, Luke.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 104, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 234-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lourenco, T, Grant, AM, Burr, JM & Vale, L 2012, 'A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures', Health Policy, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 234-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.012
Lourenco, Tania ; Grant, Adrian M ; Burr, Jennifer M ; Vale, Luke. / A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures. In: Health Policy. 2012 ; Vol. 104, No. 3. pp. 234-40.
@article{a1a349675752464a8cd8117b40997854,
title = "A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures",
abstract = "ObjectivesThe introduction of new interventional procedures is less regulated than for other health technologies such as pharmaceuticals. Decisions are often taken on evidence of efficacy and short-term safety from small-scale usually observational studies. This reflects the particular challenges of evaluating interventional procedures – the extra facets of skill and training and the difficulty defining a ‘new’ technology. Currently, there is no framework to evaluate new interventional procedures before they become available in clinical practice as opposed to new pharmaceuticals. This paper proposes a framework to guide the evaluation of a new interventional procedure.Proposed frameworkA framework was developed consisting of a four-stage progressive evaluation for a new interventional procedure: Stage 1: Development; Stage 2: Efficacy and short-term safety; Stage 3: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness; and Stage 4: Implementation. The framework also suggests the types of studies or data collection methods that can be used to satisfy each stage.ConclusionsThis paper makes a first step on a framework for generating evidence on new interventional procedures. The difficulties and limitations of applying such a framework are discussed.",
keywords = "equipment and supplies, evaluation studies as topic, Great Britain, humans, new interventional procedures, medical devices, evaluation, innovation, framework",
author = "Tania Lourenco and Grant, {Adrian M} and Burr, {Jennifer M} and Luke Vale",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. PMID: 22192887 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.012",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "234--40",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures

AU - Lourenco, Tania

AU - Grant, Adrian M

AU - Burr, Jennifer M

AU - Vale, Luke

N1 - Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. PMID: 22192887 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - ObjectivesThe introduction of new interventional procedures is less regulated than for other health technologies such as pharmaceuticals. Decisions are often taken on evidence of efficacy and short-term safety from small-scale usually observational studies. This reflects the particular challenges of evaluating interventional procedures – the extra facets of skill and training and the difficulty defining a ‘new’ technology. Currently, there is no framework to evaluate new interventional procedures before they become available in clinical practice as opposed to new pharmaceuticals. This paper proposes a framework to guide the evaluation of a new interventional procedure.Proposed frameworkA framework was developed consisting of a four-stage progressive evaluation for a new interventional procedure: Stage 1: Development; Stage 2: Efficacy and short-term safety; Stage 3: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness; and Stage 4: Implementation. The framework also suggests the types of studies or data collection methods that can be used to satisfy each stage.ConclusionsThis paper makes a first step on a framework for generating evidence on new interventional procedures. The difficulties and limitations of applying such a framework are discussed.

AB - ObjectivesThe introduction of new interventional procedures is less regulated than for other health technologies such as pharmaceuticals. Decisions are often taken on evidence of efficacy and short-term safety from small-scale usually observational studies. This reflects the particular challenges of evaluating interventional procedures – the extra facets of skill and training and the difficulty defining a ‘new’ technology. Currently, there is no framework to evaluate new interventional procedures before they become available in clinical practice as opposed to new pharmaceuticals. This paper proposes a framework to guide the evaluation of a new interventional procedure.Proposed frameworkA framework was developed consisting of a four-stage progressive evaluation for a new interventional procedure: Stage 1: Development; Stage 2: Efficacy and short-term safety; Stage 3: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness; and Stage 4: Implementation. The framework also suggests the types of studies or data collection methods that can be used to satisfy each stage.ConclusionsThis paper makes a first step on a framework for generating evidence on new interventional procedures. The difficulties and limitations of applying such a framework are discussed.

KW - equipment and supplies

KW - evaluation studies as topic

KW - Great Britain

KW - humans

KW - new interventional procedures

KW - medical devices

KW - evaluation

KW - innovation

KW - framework

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.012

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22192887

VL - 104

SP - 234

EP - 240

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 3

ER -