A Geostatistical Comparison between Routine and Event-based Water Quality Sampling

Jason Scott Lessels, Thomas Bishop

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Water quality sampling occurs throughout Australia to monitor the health of catchments. Due to Australia's variable climate event-based water quality sampling has become widespread. This research examines the two dominant sampling schemes used in Australia; routine (monthly) and event-based sampling. A linear model of co-regionalisation (LMCR) was used to model auto and cross-correlated discharge and total phosphorus data, from this both variables were co-simulated. From the simulations, different sampling schemes were applied. Estimations of total load were made using a linear mixed model (LMM) which models the relationship between discharge and concentration while accounting for the auto-correlation. Threshold exceedance was also used to compare the two sampling techniques. Further comparisons were made between model estimates and raw sample analysis. The results show that the event-based sampling is more accurate than routine sampling for load estimation. However both sampling schemes are limited in the accuracy of their estimates.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering
Subtitle of host publication33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering
EditorsE M Valentine, C J Apelt, J Ball, H Chanson, R Cox, R Ettema, G Kuczera, M Lambert, B W Melville, J E Sargison
Place of PublicationAustralia
Publisher Barton, A.C.T. : Engineers
Pages3231-3238
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9780858258686 , 0858258684
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

water quality
sampling
comparison
regionalization
autocorrelation
catchment
phosphorus
climate
simulation

Cite this

Lessels, J. S., & Bishop, T. (2011). A Geostatistical Comparison between Routine and Event-based Water Quality Sampling. In E. M. Valentine, C. J. Apelt, J. Ball, H. Chanson, R. Cox, R. Ettema, G. Kuczera, M. Lambert, B. W. Melville, ... J. E. Sargison (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering (pp. 3231-3238). Australia: Barton, A.C.T. : Engineers .

A Geostatistical Comparison between Routine and Event-based Water Quality Sampling. / Lessels, Jason Scott; Bishop, Thomas.

Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering. ed. / E M Valentine; C J Apelt; J Ball; H Chanson; R Cox; R Ettema; G Kuczera; M Lambert; B W Melville; J E Sargison. Australia : Barton, A.C.T. : Engineers , 2011. p. 3231-3238.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Lessels, JS & Bishop, T 2011, A Geostatistical Comparison between Routine and Event-based Water Quality Sampling. in EM Valentine, CJ Apelt, J Ball, H Chanson, R Cox, R Ettema, G Kuczera, M Lambert, BW Melville & JE Sargison (eds), Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering. Barton, A.C.T. : Engineers , Australia, pp. 3231-3238.
Lessels JS, Bishop T. A Geostatistical Comparison between Routine and Event-based Water Quality Sampling. In Valentine EM, Apelt CJ, Ball J, Chanson H, Cox R, Ettema R, Kuczera G, Lambert M, Melville BW, Sargison JE, editors, Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering. Australia: Barton, A.C.T. : Engineers . 2011. p. 3231-3238
Lessels, Jason Scott ; Bishop, Thomas. / A Geostatistical Comparison between Routine and Event-based Water Quality Sampling. Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering. editor / E M Valentine ; C J Apelt ; J Ball ; H Chanson ; R Cox ; R Ettema ; G Kuczera ; M Lambert ; B W Melville ; J E Sargison. Australia : Barton, A.C.T. : Engineers , 2011. pp. 3231-3238
@inproceedings{b3db09983b1e437792306399d30b5e1b,
title = "A Geostatistical Comparison between Routine and Event-based Water Quality Sampling",
abstract = "Water quality sampling occurs throughout Australia to monitor the health of catchments. Due to Australia's variable climate event-based water quality sampling has become widespread. This research examines the two dominant sampling schemes used in Australia; routine (monthly) and event-based sampling. A linear model of co-regionalisation (LMCR) was used to model auto and cross-correlated discharge and total phosphorus data, from this both variables were co-simulated. From the simulations, different sampling schemes were applied. Estimations of total load were made using a linear mixed model (LMM) which models the relationship between discharge and concentration while accounting for the auto-correlation. Threshold exceedance was also used to compare the two sampling techniques. Further comparisons were made between model estimates and raw sample analysis. The results show that the event-based sampling is more accurate than routine sampling for load estimation. However both sampling schemes are limited in the accuracy of their estimates.",
author = "Lessels, {Jason Scott} and Thomas Bishop",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780858258686",
pages = "3231--3238",
editor = "Valentine, {E M} and Apelt, {C J } and J Ball and H Chanson and R Cox and R Ettema and G Kuczera and M Lambert and Melville, {B W } and Sargison, {J E }",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering",
publisher = "Barton, A.C.T. : Engineers",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A Geostatistical Comparison between Routine and Event-based Water Quality Sampling

AU - Lessels, Jason Scott

AU - Bishop, Thomas

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Water quality sampling occurs throughout Australia to monitor the health of catchments. Due to Australia's variable climate event-based water quality sampling has become widespread. This research examines the two dominant sampling schemes used in Australia; routine (monthly) and event-based sampling. A linear model of co-regionalisation (LMCR) was used to model auto and cross-correlated discharge and total phosphorus data, from this both variables were co-simulated. From the simulations, different sampling schemes were applied. Estimations of total load were made using a linear mixed model (LMM) which models the relationship between discharge and concentration while accounting for the auto-correlation. Threshold exceedance was also used to compare the two sampling techniques. Further comparisons were made between model estimates and raw sample analysis. The results show that the event-based sampling is more accurate than routine sampling for load estimation. However both sampling schemes are limited in the accuracy of their estimates.

AB - Water quality sampling occurs throughout Australia to monitor the health of catchments. Due to Australia's variable climate event-based water quality sampling has become widespread. This research examines the two dominant sampling schemes used in Australia; routine (monthly) and event-based sampling. A linear model of co-regionalisation (LMCR) was used to model auto and cross-correlated discharge and total phosphorus data, from this both variables were co-simulated. From the simulations, different sampling schemes were applied. Estimations of total load were made using a linear mixed model (LMM) which models the relationship between discharge and concentration while accounting for the auto-correlation. Threshold exceedance was also used to compare the two sampling techniques. Further comparisons were made between model estimates and raw sample analysis. The results show that the event-based sampling is more accurate than routine sampling for load estimation. However both sampling schemes are limited in the accuracy of their estimates.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780858258686

SN - 0858258684

SP - 3231

EP - 3238

BT - Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering

A2 - Valentine, E M

A2 - Apelt, C J

A2 - Ball, J

A2 - Chanson, H

A2 - Cox, R

A2 - Ettema, R

A2 - Kuczera, G

A2 - Lambert, M

A2 - Melville, B W

A2 - Sargison, J E

PB - Barton, A.C.T. : Engineers

CY - Australia

ER -