A landmark-based approach for assessing the reliability of mandibular tooth crowding as a marker of dog domestication

Carly Ameen, Ardern Hulme-Beaman, Allowen Evin, Mietje Germonpré, Kate Britton, Thomas Cucchi, Greger Larson, Keith Dobney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Tooth crowding is one of several criteria used to infer the process of domestication in the zooarchaeological record. It has been primarily used to support claims of early animal domestication, perhaps most contentiously in claims for the existence of so-called “proto-domestic” dogs as early as the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic. Tooth crowding studies vary in their methodological approaches, and interpretation of the resulting data is constrained by the limited geographic and temporal scope of reference specimens used to construct an appropriate comparative framework. To address these key problems, we present a standardised landmark-based protocol for the measurement and quantification of mandibular tooth crowding that can be systematically applied in the context of dog domestication research. We then test the assumption that tooth crowding is less frequent in ancient and modern wild wolf populations by examining 750 modern dogs and 205 modern wolves from across the modern geographic range of Canis lupus as well as 66 Late Pleistocene wolves from Alaska.

Our results demonstrate that landmark-based metrics provide a reliable approach for recording and analysing tooth crowding. Although it is likely that the relatively low frequency of tooth crowding found in our modern dog dataset (∼6%) in part reflects the ‘modern’ morphology of domestic breeds, the higher frequency of crowding in both modern (∼18%) and ancient (∼36%) wolves strongly suggests that current assumptions linking tooth crowding with the process of early domestication (at least in dogs) should be critically re-evaluated, and that further investigations into the drivers behind these developmental patterns should be pursued.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-50
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume85
Early online date11 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

quantification
recording
animal
driver
interpretation
Dog
Domestication
Landmarks
Teeth

Keywords

  • domestication
  • dog
  • wolf
  • canid
  • tooth crowding
  • toothrow

Cite this

A landmark-based approach for assessing the reliability of mandibular tooth crowding as a marker of dog domestication. / Ameen, Carly; Hulme-Beaman, Ardern; Evin, Allowen; Germonpré, Mietje; Britton, Kate; Cucchi, Thomas; Larson, Greger; Dobney, Keith.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 85, 09.2017, p. 41-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ameen, Carly ; Hulme-Beaman, Ardern ; Evin, Allowen ; Germonpré, Mietje ; Britton, Kate ; Cucchi, Thomas ; Larson, Greger ; Dobney, Keith. / A landmark-based approach for assessing the reliability of mandibular tooth crowding as a marker of dog domestication. In: Journal of Archaeological Science. 2017 ; Vol. 85. pp. 41-50.
@article{b55cb0df5379408e8aedefa091966be0,
title = "A landmark-based approach for assessing the reliability of mandibular tooth crowding as a marker of dog domestication",
abstract = "Tooth crowding is one of several criteria used to infer the process of domestication in the zooarchaeological record. It has been primarily used to support claims of early animal domestication, perhaps most contentiously in claims for the existence of so-called “proto-domestic” dogs as early as the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic. Tooth crowding studies vary in their methodological approaches, and interpretation of the resulting data is constrained by the limited geographic and temporal scope of reference specimens used to construct an appropriate comparative framework. To address these key problems, we present a standardised landmark-based protocol for the measurement and quantification of mandibular tooth crowding that can be systematically applied in the context of dog domestication research. We then test the assumption that tooth crowding is less frequent in ancient and modern wild wolf populations by examining 750 modern dogs and 205 modern wolves from across the modern geographic range of Canis lupus as well as 66 Late Pleistocene wolves from Alaska.Our results demonstrate that landmark-based metrics provide a reliable approach for recording and analysing tooth crowding. Although it is likely that the relatively low frequency of tooth crowding found in our modern dog dataset (∼6{\%}) in part reflects the ‘modern’ morphology of domestic breeds, the higher frequency of crowding in both modern (∼18{\%}) and ancient (∼36{\%}) wolves strongly suggests that current assumptions linking tooth crowding with the process of early domestication (at least in dogs) should be critically re-evaluated, and that further investigations into the drivers behind these developmental patterns should be pursued.",
keywords = "domestication, dog, wolf, canid, tooth crowding, toothrow",
author = "Carly Ameen and Ardern Hulme-Beaman and Allowen Evin and Mietje Germonpr{\'e} and Kate Britton and Thomas Cucchi and Greger Larson and Keith Dobney",
note = "Acknowledgements We are grateful to the curators and staff of many museums and institutions for kindly providing access to collections under their care, especially Marc Nussbaumer & Andre Rehazek of Naturhistorisches Museum Bern, Jack Tseng of the American Museum of Natural History, and Richard Meadow of Peabody Museum, Harvard University. Additionally, we are thankful to Richard Allen, Anna Linderholm and Angela Perri for their help with sourcing and collecting data for this study. This work was supported by NERC (NE/K003259/1), and the European Research Council (ERC-2013-StG 337574-UNDEAD).",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.014",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "41--50",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science",
issn = "0305-4403",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A landmark-based approach for assessing the reliability of mandibular tooth crowding as a marker of dog domestication

AU - Ameen, Carly

AU - Hulme-Beaman, Ardern

AU - Evin, Allowen

AU - Germonpré, Mietje

AU - Britton, Kate

AU - Cucchi, Thomas

AU - Larson, Greger

AU - Dobney, Keith

N1 - Acknowledgements We are grateful to the curators and staff of many museums and institutions for kindly providing access to collections under their care, especially Marc Nussbaumer & Andre Rehazek of Naturhistorisches Museum Bern, Jack Tseng of the American Museum of Natural History, and Richard Meadow of Peabody Museum, Harvard University. Additionally, we are thankful to Richard Allen, Anna Linderholm and Angela Perri for their help with sourcing and collecting data for this study. This work was supported by NERC (NE/K003259/1), and the European Research Council (ERC-2013-StG 337574-UNDEAD).

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Tooth crowding is one of several criteria used to infer the process of domestication in the zooarchaeological record. It has been primarily used to support claims of early animal domestication, perhaps most contentiously in claims for the existence of so-called “proto-domestic” dogs as early as the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic. Tooth crowding studies vary in their methodological approaches, and interpretation of the resulting data is constrained by the limited geographic and temporal scope of reference specimens used to construct an appropriate comparative framework. To address these key problems, we present a standardised landmark-based protocol for the measurement and quantification of mandibular tooth crowding that can be systematically applied in the context of dog domestication research. We then test the assumption that tooth crowding is less frequent in ancient and modern wild wolf populations by examining 750 modern dogs and 205 modern wolves from across the modern geographic range of Canis lupus as well as 66 Late Pleistocene wolves from Alaska.Our results demonstrate that landmark-based metrics provide a reliable approach for recording and analysing tooth crowding. Although it is likely that the relatively low frequency of tooth crowding found in our modern dog dataset (∼6%) in part reflects the ‘modern’ morphology of domestic breeds, the higher frequency of crowding in both modern (∼18%) and ancient (∼36%) wolves strongly suggests that current assumptions linking tooth crowding with the process of early domestication (at least in dogs) should be critically re-evaluated, and that further investigations into the drivers behind these developmental patterns should be pursued.

AB - Tooth crowding is one of several criteria used to infer the process of domestication in the zooarchaeological record. It has been primarily used to support claims of early animal domestication, perhaps most contentiously in claims for the existence of so-called “proto-domestic” dogs as early as the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic. Tooth crowding studies vary in their methodological approaches, and interpretation of the resulting data is constrained by the limited geographic and temporal scope of reference specimens used to construct an appropriate comparative framework. To address these key problems, we present a standardised landmark-based protocol for the measurement and quantification of mandibular tooth crowding that can be systematically applied in the context of dog domestication research. We then test the assumption that tooth crowding is less frequent in ancient and modern wild wolf populations by examining 750 modern dogs and 205 modern wolves from across the modern geographic range of Canis lupus as well as 66 Late Pleistocene wolves from Alaska.Our results demonstrate that landmark-based metrics provide a reliable approach for recording and analysing tooth crowding. Although it is likely that the relatively low frequency of tooth crowding found in our modern dog dataset (∼6%) in part reflects the ‘modern’ morphology of domestic breeds, the higher frequency of crowding in both modern (∼18%) and ancient (∼36%) wolves strongly suggests that current assumptions linking tooth crowding with the process of early domestication (at least in dogs) should be critically re-evaluated, and that further investigations into the drivers behind these developmental patterns should be pursued.

KW - domestication

KW - dog

KW - wolf

KW - canid

KW - tooth crowding

KW - toothrow

U2 - 10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.014

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 41

EP - 50

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science

SN - 0305-4403

ER -