A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within the EU-ETS Framework

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationSpecial issue

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within The EU-ETS Framework Concerns about the cost of CO2 capture and sequestration, and the effectiveness of carbon abatement policies loom large in discussions on climate change mitigation. Several writers address the issue from various perspectives. This paper attempts to add relative realism to discussions on CO2 capture costs, and, the deployment of carbon capture technology in the UK by using publicly available company data on the long term capacity expansion and CO2 capture investment programmes of selected power plants in the UK. With an estimated £8 billion plan to install a generation capacity of 11 GW and capture capability of 44 MtCO2/year, it is imperative to optimise this huge potential investment. A least-cost optimisation model was formulated and solved with the LP algorithm available in GAMS. The model was then applied to address a number of issues, including the choice of an optimal carbon abatement policy within the EU-ETS framework. The major findings of the study include (a) the long term total cost curve of CO2 capture has three phases - rising, plateau, rising; (b) alternative capture technologies do not have permanent relative cost advantages or disadvantages; (c) Government incentives encourage carbon capture and the avoidance of emission penalty charges; and (d) the goals of EU-ETS are more effectively realised with deeper cuts in the EUA ratios than merely hiking the emission penalty, as proposed in EU-ETS Phase II.
Original languageEnglish
Pages99-134
Number of pages36
Volume29
No.special issue 1
Specialist publicationThe Energy Journal
PublisherInternational Association for Energy Economics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Power plants
Costs
Carbon capture
Carbon
Looms
Climate change
Industry

Keywords

  • future
  • curves
  • EU-ETS

Cite this

A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within the EU-ETS Framework. / Kemp, Alexander George; Kasim, Sola Abass.

In: The Energy Journal, Vol. 29, No. special issue 1, 2008, p. 99-134.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationSpecial issue

@misc{0c48508bef6148c08ccf6b490c84ed75,
title = "A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within the EU-ETS Framework",
abstract = "A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within The EU-ETS Framework Concerns about the cost of CO2 capture and sequestration, and the effectiveness of carbon abatement policies loom large in discussions on climate change mitigation. Several writers address the issue from various perspectives. This paper attempts to add relative realism to discussions on CO2 capture costs, and, the deployment of carbon capture technology in the UK by using publicly available company data on the long term capacity expansion and CO2 capture investment programmes of selected power plants in the UK. With an estimated £8 billion plan to install a generation capacity of 11 GW and capture capability of 44 MtCO2/year, it is imperative to optimise this huge potential investment. A least-cost optimisation model was formulated and solved with the LP algorithm available in GAMS. The model was then applied to address a number of issues, including the choice of an optimal carbon abatement policy within the EU-ETS framework. The major findings of the study include (a) the long term total cost curve of CO2 capture has three phases - rising, plateau, rising; (b) alternative capture technologies do not have permanent relative cost advantages or disadvantages; (c) Government incentives encourage carbon capture and the avoidance of emission penalty charges; and (d) the goals of EU-ETS are more effectively realised with deeper cuts in the EUA ratios than merely hiking the emission penalty, as proposed in EU-ETS Phase II.",
keywords = "future, curves, EU-ETS",
author = "Kemp, {Alexander George} and Kasim, {Sola Abass}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-NoSI-7",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "99--134",
journal = "The Energy Journal",
issn = "0195-6574",
publisher = "International Association for Energy Economics",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within the EU-ETS Framework

AU - Kemp, Alexander George

AU - Kasim, Sola Abass

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within The EU-ETS Framework Concerns about the cost of CO2 capture and sequestration, and the effectiveness of carbon abatement policies loom large in discussions on climate change mitigation. Several writers address the issue from various perspectives. This paper attempts to add relative realism to discussions on CO2 capture costs, and, the deployment of carbon capture technology in the UK by using publicly available company data on the long term capacity expansion and CO2 capture investment programmes of selected power plants in the UK. With an estimated £8 billion plan to install a generation capacity of 11 GW and capture capability of 44 MtCO2/year, it is imperative to optimise this huge potential investment. A least-cost optimisation model was formulated and solved with the LP algorithm available in GAMS. The model was then applied to address a number of issues, including the choice of an optimal carbon abatement policy within the EU-ETS framework. The major findings of the study include (a) the long term total cost curve of CO2 capture has three phases - rising, plateau, rising; (b) alternative capture technologies do not have permanent relative cost advantages or disadvantages; (c) Government incentives encourage carbon capture and the avoidance of emission penalty charges; and (d) the goals of EU-ETS are more effectively realised with deeper cuts in the EUA ratios than merely hiking the emission penalty, as proposed in EU-ETS Phase II.

AB - A Least-Cost Optimisation Model of CO2 Capture Applied to Major UK Power Plants Within The EU-ETS Framework Concerns about the cost of CO2 capture and sequestration, and the effectiveness of carbon abatement policies loom large in discussions on climate change mitigation. Several writers address the issue from various perspectives. This paper attempts to add relative realism to discussions on CO2 capture costs, and, the deployment of carbon capture technology in the UK by using publicly available company data on the long term capacity expansion and CO2 capture investment programmes of selected power plants in the UK. With an estimated £8 billion plan to install a generation capacity of 11 GW and capture capability of 44 MtCO2/year, it is imperative to optimise this huge potential investment. A least-cost optimisation model was formulated and solved with the LP algorithm available in GAMS. The model was then applied to address a number of issues, including the choice of an optimal carbon abatement policy within the EU-ETS framework. The major findings of the study include (a) the long term total cost curve of CO2 capture has three phases - rising, plateau, rising; (b) alternative capture technologies do not have permanent relative cost advantages or disadvantages; (c) Government incentives encourage carbon capture and the avoidance of emission penalty charges; and (d) the goals of EU-ETS are more effectively realised with deeper cuts in the EUA ratios than merely hiking the emission penalty, as proposed in EU-ETS Phase II.

KW - future

KW - curves

KW - EU-ETS

U2 - 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-NoSI-7

DO - 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-NoSI-7

M3 - Special issue

VL - 29

SP - 99

EP - 134

JO - The Energy Journal

JF - The Energy Journal

SN - 0195-6574

PB - International Association for Energy Economics

ER -