A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi

Adam Wyner, Rinke Hoekstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper provides an OWL ontology for legal cases with an instantiation of the legal case Popov v. Hayashi. The ontology makes explicit the conceptual knowledge of the legal case domain, supports reasoning about the domain, and can be used to annotate the text of cases, which in turn can be used to populate the ontology. A populated ontology is a case base which can be used for information retrieval, information extraction, and case based reasoning. The ontology contains not only elements for indexing the case (e.g. the parties, jurisdiction, and date), but as well elements used to reason to a decision such as argument schemes and the components input to the schemes. We use the Protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system, current guidelines for ontology development, and tools for visual and linguistic presentation of the ontology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-107
Number of pages24
JournalArtificial Intelligence and Law
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

ontology
Ontology
Case based reasoning
Knowledge acquisition
knowledge acquisition
indexing
Information retrieval
information retrieval
Linguistics
jurisdiction
Computer systems
editor
linguistics

Keywords

  • legal case
  • ontology
  • OWL
  • case based reasoning

Cite this

A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi. / Wyner, Adam; Hoekstra, Rinke .

In: Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol. 20, No. 1, 03.2012, p. 83-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wyner, Adam ; Hoekstra, Rinke . / A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi. In: Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2012 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 83-107.
@article{d5a4eee9361b4c0cbcc243cde6562b0b,
title = "A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi",
abstract = "The paper provides an OWL ontology for legal cases with an instantiation of the legal case Popov v. Hayashi. The ontology makes explicit the conceptual knowledge of the legal case domain, supports reasoning about the domain, and can be used to annotate the text of cases, which in turn can be used to populate the ontology. A populated ontology is a case base which can be used for information retrieval, information extraction, and case based reasoning. The ontology contains not only elements for indexing the case (e.g. the parties, jurisdiction, and date), but as well elements used to reason to a decision such as argument schemes and the components input to the schemes. We use the Prot{\'e}g{\'e} ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system, current guidelines for ontology development, and tools for visual and linguistic presentation of the ontology.",
keywords = "legal case, ontology, OWL, case based reasoning",
author = "Adam Wyner and Rinke Hoekstra",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10506-012-9119-6",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "83--107",
journal = "Artificial Intelligence and Law",
issn = "0924-8463",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi

AU - Wyner, Adam

AU - Hoekstra, Rinke

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - The paper provides an OWL ontology for legal cases with an instantiation of the legal case Popov v. Hayashi. The ontology makes explicit the conceptual knowledge of the legal case domain, supports reasoning about the domain, and can be used to annotate the text of cases, which in turn can be used to populate the ontology. A populated ontology is a case base which can be used for information retrieval, information extraction, and case based reasoning. The ontology contains not only elements for indexing the case (e.g. the parties, jurisdiction, and date), but as well elements used to reason to a decision such as argument schemes and the components input to the schemes. We use the Protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system, current guidelines for ontology development, and tools for visual and linguistic presentation of the ontology.

AB - The paper provides an OWL ontology for legal cases with an instantiation of the legal case Popov v. Hayashi. The ontology makes explicit the conceptual knowledge of the legal case domain, supports reasoning about the domain, and can be used to annotate the text of cases, which in turn can be used to populate the ontology. A populated ontology is a case base which can be used for information retrieval, information extraction, and case based reasoning. The ontology contains not only elements for indexing the case (e.g. the parties, jurisdiction, and date), but as well elements used to reason to a decision such as argument schemes and the components input to the schemes. We use the Protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system, current guidelines for ontology development, and tools for visual and linguistic presentation of the ontology.

KW - legal case

KW - ontology

KW - OWL

KW - case based reasoning

U2 - 10.1007/s10506-012-9119-6

DO - 10.1007/s10506-012-9119-6

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 83

EP - 107

JO - Artificial Intelligence and Law

JF - Artificial Intelligence and Law

SN - 0924-8463

IS - 1

ER -