A Liberal Grand Strategy in a Realist World?

Power, Purpose, and the EU’s Changing Global Role

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) is one of the most unusual global political actors, and it inspires numerous scholarly debates about its power and purpose. One of the most important such debates involves the role of material versus non-material/ideational power resources – or hard versus soft power – in understanding the EU's ‘actorness’. Given the increasingly wide range of EU policy competencies, and the increasingly complex demands placed on the EU, this article embeds this debate in the larger context of grand strategy. It first argues that the EU's efforts as a global actor do conform to three basic components of grand strategy: physical security; economic prosperity; and value projection. Second, it analyses the content of the EU's grand strategic goals at three levels of analysis: intra-EU; regional (or neighbourhood); and global. Finally, it analyses the EU's implementation of its (largely liberal) strategic goals, particularly in terms of how they might compete with those of other global actors, such as the United States (US).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-163
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

EU
political actor
prosperity
projection
resources
economics
Values

Keywords

  • CFSP/ESDP
  • enlargement
  • European neighbourhood policy
  • grand strategy
  • liberalism
  • normative power

Cite this

@article{25be61252369440190b46e40b49631e8,
title = "A Liberal Grand Strategy in a Realist World?: Power, Purpose, and the EU’s Changing Global Role",
abstract = "The European Union (EU) is one of the most unusual global political actors, and it inspires numerous scholarly debates about its power and purpose. One of the most important such debates involves the role of material versus non-material/ideational power resources – or hard versus soft power – in understanding the EU's ‘actorness’. Given the increasingly wide range of EU policy competencies, and the increasingly complex demands placed on the EU, this article embeds this debate in the larger context of grand strategy. It first argues that the EU's efforts as a global actor do conform to three basic components of grand strategy: physical security; economic prosperity; and value projection. Second, it analyses the content of the EU's grand strategic goals at three levels of analysis: intra-EU; regional (or neighbourhood); and global. Finally, it analyses the EU's implementation of its (largely liberal) strategic goals, particularly in terms of how they might compete with those of other global actors, such as the United States (US).",
keywords = "CFSP/ESDP, enlargement, European neighbourhood policy, grand strategy, liberalism, normative power",
author = "Smith, {Michael E}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2011.544487",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "144--163",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Liberal Grand Strategy in a Realist World?

T2 - Power, Purpose, and the EU’s Changing Global Role

AU - Smith, Michael E

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The European Union (EU) is one of the most unusual global political actors, and it inspires numerous scholarly debates about its power and purpose. One of the most important such debates involves the role of material versus non-material/ideational power resources – or hard versus soft power – in understanding the EU's ‘actorness’. Given the increasingly wide range of EU policy competencies, and the increasingly complex demands placed on the EU, this article embeds this debate in the larger context of grand strategy. It first argues that the EU's efforts as a global actor do conform to three basic components of grand strategy: physical security; economic prosperity; and value projection. Second, it analyses the content of the EU's grand strategic goals at three levels of analysis: intra-EU; regional (or neighbourhood); and global. Finally, it analyses the EU's implementation of its (largely liberal) strategic goals, particularly in terms of how they might compete with those of other global actors, such as the United States (US).

AB - The European Union (EU) is one of the most unusual global political actors, and it inspires numerous scholarly debates about its power and purpose. One of the most important such debates involves the role of material versus non-material/ideational power resources – or hard versus soft power – in understanding the EU's ‘actorness’. Given the increasingly wide range of EU policy competencies, and the increasingly complex demands placed on the EU, this article embeds this debate in the larger context of grand strategy. It first argues that the EU's efforts as a global actor do conform to three basic components of grand strategy: physical security; economic prosperity; and value projection. Second, it analyses the content of the EU's grand strategic goals at three levels of analysis: intra-EU; regional (or neighbourhood); and global. Finally, it analyses the EU's implementation of its (largely liberal) strategic goals, particularly in terms of how they might compete with those of other global actors, such as the United States (US).

KW - CFSP/ESDP

KW - enlargement

KW - European neighbourhood policy

KW - grand strategy

KW - liberalism

KW - normative power

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2011.544487

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2011.544487

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 144

EP - 163

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 2

ER -