A literature review of principles, policies and practice in extended nursing roles relating to UK intensive care settings

Namita Srivastava, Janet Stephen Tucker, Elizabeth S Draper, Michelle Milner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims. To provide an overview of the literature relating to the principles, policy and practice of extended nursing roles in UK intensive care settings to date; to review and critically assess evidence of impact, outcomes and effect on practice and provide suggestions for future research.
Background. It is known that career development opportunities, new technologies, patient needs, as well as the reduction in junior doctors' hours, are driving the development of new roles for nurses. Policy initiatives aim to expand nursing roles to support professional substitution. In adult, neonatal and paediatric intensive care, specialist trained nurses and designated advanced nursing practitioners are increasingly taking on extended practice of clinical tasks previously undertaken by medical staff. As yet there are no statutory regulations on the perceived scope and definition of the role of extended and advanced roles.
Design. Systematic review.
Methods. Search of electronic databases and selection of policy and peer-reviewed reports and reviews of extended nursing roles or advanced nursing practitioners in UK intensive care settings.
Results. Chronological review shows policy development proceeding in a relatively ad hoc way. There is limited information available about how extensively or effectively extended nursing roles are being implemented in intensive care settings in the UK, particularly in adult and paediatric intensive care. To test local initiative findings for reliability and generalisability, a more robust evidence base is required.
Conclusions. More data are needed on definition and outcomes of extended nursing roles in intensive care and care process measures should be developed to better inform implementation of nurse role development in the UK.
Relevance to clinical practice. The review of policy and research evidence in this paper may better inform clinicians working in adult, neonatal or paediatric intensive care, as they continue to be challenged by expansion and development of their role. It may also help to form a basis and evaluation for future research into extended and advanced nursing roles in intensive care settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2671-2680
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume17
Issue number20
Early online date17 Sep 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Nursing
Nurse's Role
Pediatrics
Neonatal Intensive Care
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Policy Making
Medical Staff
Databases
Technology
Research

Keywords

  • advanced neonatal nurse practitioners
  • advanced nurse practitioners
  • advanced nursing
  • advanced nursing practice
  • intensive care
  • nursing workforce
  • framework
  • specialist
  • education

Cite this

A literature review of principles, policies and practice in extended nursing roles relating to UK intensive care settings. / Srivastava, Namita; Tucker, Janet Stephen; Draper, Elizabeth S; Milner, Michelle.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 17, No. 20, 10.2008, p. 2671-2680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Srivastava, Namita ; Tucker, Janet Stephen ; Draper, Elizabeth S ; Milner, Michelle. / A literature review of principles, policies and practice in extended nursing roles relating to UK intensive care settings. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2008 ; Vol. 17, No. 20. pp. 2671-2680.
@article{a000b3cc04884810a2ce62e51bb1544e,
title = "A literature review of principles, policies and practice in extended nursing roles relating to UK intensive care settings",
abstract = "Aims. To provide an overview of the literature relating to the principles, policy and practice of extended nursing roles in UK intensive care settings to date; to review and critically assess evidence of impact, outcomes and effect on practice and provide suggestions for future research. Background. It is known that career development opportunities, new technologies, patient needs, as well as the reduction in junior doctors' hours, are driving the development of new roles for nurses. Policy initiatives aim to expand nursing roles to support professional substitution. In adult, neonatal and paediatric intensive care, specialist trained nurses and designated advanced nursing practitioners are increasingly taking on extended practice of clinical tasks previously undertaken by medical staff. As yet there are no statutory regulations on the perceived scope and definition of the role of extended and advanced roles. Design. Systematic review. Methods. Search of electronic databases and selection of policy and peer-reviewed reports and reviews of extended nursing roles or advanced nursing practitioners in UK intensive care settings. Results. Chronological review shows policy development proceeding in a relatively ad hoc way. There is limited information available about how extensively or effectively extended nursing roles are being implemented in intensive care settings in the UK, particularly in adult and paediatric intensive care. To test local initiative findings for reliability and generalisability, a more robust evidence base is required. Conclusions. More data are needed on definition and outcomes of extended nursing roles in intensive care and care process measures should be developed to better inform implementation of nurse role development in the UK. Relevance to clinical practice. The review of policy and research evidence in this paper may better inform clinicians working in adult, neonatal or paediatric intensive care, as they continue to be challenged by expansion and development of their role. It may also help to form a basis and evaluation for future research into extended and advanced nursing roles in intensive care settings.",
keywords = "advanced neonatal nurse practitioners, advanced nurse practitioners, advanced nursing, advanced nursing practice, intensive care, nursing workforce, framework, specialist, education",
author = "Namita Srivastava and Tucker, {Janet Stephen} and Draper, {Elizabeth S} and Michelle Milner",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02481.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "2671--2680",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A literature review of principles, policies and practice in extended nursing roles relating to UK intensive care settings

AU - Srivastava, Namita

AU - Tucker, Janet Stephen

AU - Draper, Elizabeth S

AU - Milner, Michelle

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Aims. To provide an overview of the literature relating to the principles, policy and practice of extended nursing roles in UK intensive care settings to date; to review and critically assess evidence of impact, outcomes and effect on practice and provide suggestions for future research. Background. It is known that career development opportunities, new technologies, patient needs, as well as the reduction in junior doctors' hours, are driving the development of new roles for nurses. Policy initiatives aim to expand nursing roles to support professional substitution. In adult, neonatal and paediatric intensive care, specialist trained nurses and designated advanced nursing practitioners are increasingly taking on extended practice of clinical tasks previously undertaken by medical staff. As yet there are no statutory regulations on the perceived scope and definition of the role of extended and advanced roles. Design. Systematic review. Methods. Search of electronic databases and selection of policy and peer-reviewed reports and reviews of extended nursing roles or advanced nursing practitioners in UK intensive care settings. Results. Chronological review shows policy development proceeding in a relatively ad hoc way. There is limited information available about how extensively or effectively extended nursing roles are being implemented in intensive care settings in the UK, particularly in adult and paediatric intensive care. To test local initiative findings for reliability and generalisability, a more robust evidence base is required. Conclusions. More data are needed on definition and outcomes of extended nursing roles in intensive care and care process measures should be developed to better inform implementation of nurse role development in the UK. Relevance to clinical practice. The review of policy and research evidence in this paper may better inform clinicians working in adult, neonatal or paediatric intensive care, as they continue to be challenged by expansion and development of their role. It may also help to form a basis and evaluation for future research into extended and advanced nursing roles in intensive care settings.

AB - Aims. To provide an overview of the literature relating to the principles, policy and practice of extended nursing roles in UK intensive care settings to date; to review and critically assess evidence of impact, outcomes and effect on practice and provide suggestions for future research. Background. It is known that career development opportunities, new technologies, patient needs, as well as the reduction in junior doctors' hours, are driving the development of new roles for nurses. Policy initiatives aim to expand nursing roles to support professional substitution. In adult, neonatal and paediatric intensive care, specialist trained nurses and designated advanced nursing practitioners are increasingly taking on extended practice of clinical tasks previously undertaken by medical staff. As yet there are no statutory regulations on the perceived scope and definition of the role of extended and advanced roles. Design. Systematic review. Methods. Search of electronic databases and selection of policy and peer-reviewed reports and reviews of extended nursing roles or advanced nursing practitioners in UK intensive care settings. Results. Chronological review shows policy development proceeding in a relatively ad hoc way. There is limited information available about how extensively or effectively extended nursing roles are being implemented in intensive care settings in the UK, particularly in adult and paediatric intensive care. To test local initiative findings for reliability and generalisability, a more robust evidence base is required. Conclusions. More data are needed on definition and outcomes of extended nursing roles in intensive care and care process measures should be developed to better inform implementation of nurse role development in the UK. Relevance to clinical practice. The review of policy and research evidence in this paper may better inform clinicians working in adult, neonatal or paediatric intensive care, as they continue to be challenged by expansion and development of their role. It may also help to form a basis and evaluation for future research into extended and advanced nursing roles in intensive care settings.

KW - advanced neonatal nurse practitioners

KW - advanced nurse practitioners

KW - advanced nursing

KW - advanced nursing practice

KW - intensive care

KW - nursing workforce

KW - framework

KW - specialist

KW - education

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02481.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02481.x

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 2671

EP - 2680

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 20

ER -