A Lot on Your Plate? Well-to-Well Contamination as an Additional Confounder in Microbiome Sequence Analyses

Alan W. Walker (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

3 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

DNA sequence-based microbiome studies can be impacted by a range of different methodological artefacts. Contamination originating from laboratory kits and reagents can lead to erroneous results, particularly in samples containing a low microbial biomass. Minich and colleagues (mSystems 4:e00186-19, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00186-19) report on a different form of contamination, cross-contamination between samples that are processed together. They find that transfer of material between samples in 96-well plates is a common occurrence. The DNA extraction step, particularly when carried out automatedly, is identified as the major source of this contamination type. Well-to-well contamination distorts diversity measures, with low-biomass samples particularly affected. This report has important implications for attempts to decontaminate microbiome sequencing results. As contamination is derived from both external sources and crossover between samples, it is not appropriate to simply remove sequence variants that are detected in negative-control blanks, and more-nuanced decontamination approaches may be required.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere00362-19
Number of pages3
JournalmSystems
Volume4
Issue number4
Early online date25 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • contamination
  • microbiome
  • sequencing
  • Sequencing
  • Contamination
  • Microbiome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology
  • Biochemistry
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Microbiology
  • Modelling and Simulation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Lot on Your Plate? Well-to-Well Contamination as an Additional Confounder in Microbiome Sequence Analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this