A model of personality change after traumatic brain injury and the development of the Brain Injury Personality Scales (BIPS)

M. C. Obonsawin, S. Jefferis, R. Lowe, John Robertson Crawford, J. Fernandes, L. Holland, K. Woldt, E. Worthington, G. Bowie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to develop models of personality change after traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on information provided by the TBI survivor and a significant other (SO), and to compare the models generated from the two different sources of information.
Methods: Individuals with and without TBI and an SO were interviewed separately about their current personality. The SOs were also interviewed about the personality of the TBI survivor before the injury. A subset of TBI survivors and their SOs were interviewed twice to assess test-retest reliability. Items which were not associated with personality change after TBI, which could not be measured reliably or which did not contribute to the model, were excluded.
Results: Of the 123 original items, 29 items from the interview with the survivor and 31 items from the interview with the SO were retained to form the Brain Injury Personality Scales. Separate factor analyses of ratings from each interview (survivor and SO) resulted in seven first order factors. The second order factor analyses for each interview resulted in four factors. Concordance between the information obtained from the two interviews was low.
Conclusions: The information obtained from the interviews with the TBI survivors and the SOs produced two models with a similar structure: three superordinate factors of personality items (affective regulation, behavioural regulation and engagement) and one superordinate factor of items relevant to mental state (restlessness and range of thought). Despite the similarity in structure, the content of the information obtained from the two interviews was different.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1239-1247
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Volume78
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

Keywords

  • head injury
  • ratings
  • relatives
  • awareness
  • validity
  • traits

Cite this

A model of personality change after traumatic brain injury and the development of the Brain Injury Personality Scales (BIPS). / Obonsawin, M. C.; Jefferis, S.; Lowe, R.; Crawford, John Robertson; Fernandes, J.; Holland, L.; Woldt, K.; Worthington, E.; Bowie, G.

In: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Vol. 78, No. 11, 11.2007, p. 1239-1247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Obonsawin, M. C. ; Jefferis, S. ; Lowe, R. ; Crawford, John Robertson ; Fernandes, J. ; Holland, L. ; Woldt, K. ; Worthington, E. ; Bowie, G. / A model of personality change after traumatic brain injury and the development of the Brain Injury Personality Scales (BIPS). In: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2007 ; Vol. 78, No. 11. pp. 1239-1247.
@article{fecce6ea581244b7be37b795e42970f5,
title = "A model of personality change after traumatic brain injury and the development of the Brain Injury Personality Scales (BIPS)",
abstract = "Objective: The aims of this study were to develop models of personality change after traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on information provided by the TBI survivor and a significant other (SO), and to compare the models generated from the two different sources of information. Methods: Individuals with and without TBI and an SO were interviewed separately about their current personality. The SOs were also interviewed about the personality of the TBI survivor before the injury. A subset of TBI survivors and their SOs were interviewed twice to assess test-retest reliability. Items which were not associated with personality change after TBI, which could not be measured reliably or which did not contribute to the model, were excluded. Results: Of the 123 original items, 29 items from the interview with the survivor and 31 items from the interview with the SO were retained to form the Brain Injury Personality Scales. Separate factor analyses of ratings from each interview (survivor and SO) resulted in seven first order factors. The second order factor analyses for each interview resulted in four factors. Concordance between the information obtained from the two interviews was low. Conclusions: The information obtained from the interviews with the TBI survivors and the SOs produced two models with a similar structure: three superordinate factors of personality items (affective regulation, behavioural regulation and engagement) and one superordinate factor of items relevant to mental state (restlessness and range of thought). Despite the similarity in structure, the content of the information obtained from the two interviews was different.",
keywords = "head injury, ratings, relatives, awareness, validity, traits",
author = "Obonsawin, {M. C.} and S. Jefferis and R. Lowe and Crawford, {John Robertson} and J. Fernandes and L. Holland and K. Woldt and E. Worthington and G. Bowie",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1136/jnnp.2004.052654",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "1239--1247",
journal = "Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry",
issn = "0022-3050",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A model of personality change after traumatic brain injury and the development of the Brain Injury Personality Scales (BIPS)

AU - Obonsawin, M. C.

AU - Jefferis, S.

AU - Lowe, R.

AU - Crawford, John Robertson

AU - Fernandes, J.

AU - Holland, L.

AU - Woldt, K.

AU - Worthington, E.

AU - Bowie, G.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Objective: The aims of this study were to develop models of personality change after traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on information provided by the TBI survivor and a significant other (SO), and to compare the models generated from the two different sources of information. Methods: Individuals with and without TBI and an SO were interviewed separately about their current personality. The SOs were also interviewed about the personality of the TBI survivor before the injury. A subset of TBI survivors and their SOs were interviewed twice to assess test-retest reliability. Items which were not associated with personality change after TBI, which could not be measured reliably or which did not contribute to the model, were excluded. Results: Of the 123 original items, 29 items from the interview with the survivor and 31 items from the interview with the SO were retained to form the Brain Injury Personality Scales. Separate factor analyses of ratings from each interview (survivor and SO) resulted in seven first order factors. The second order factor analyses for each interview resulted in four factors. Concordance between the information obtained from the two interviews was low. Conclusions: The information obtained from the interviews with the TBI survivors and the SOs produced two models with a similar structure: three superordinate factors of personality items (affective regulation, behavioural regulation and engagement) and one superordinate factor of items relevant to mental state (restlessness and range of thought). Despite the similarity in structure, the content of the information obtained from the two interviews was different.

AB - Objective: The aims of this study were to develop models of personality change after traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on information provided by the TBI survivor and a significant other (SO), and to compare the models generated from the two different sources of information. Methods: Individuals with and without TBI and an SO were interviewed separately about their current personality. The SOs were also interviewed about the personality of the TBI survivor before the injury. A subset of TBI survivors and their SOs were interviewed twice to assess test-retest reliability. Items which were not associated with personality change after TBI, which could not be measured reliably or which did not contribute to the model, were excluded. Results: Of the 123 original items, 29 items from the interview with the survivor and 31 items from the interview with the SO were retained to form the Brain Injury Personality Scales. Separate factor analyses of ratings from each interview (survivor and SO) resulted in seven first order factors. The second order factor analyses for each interview resulted in four factors. Concordance between the information obtained from the two interviews was low. Conclusions: The information obtained from the interviews with the TBI survivors and the SOs produced two models with a similar structure: three superordinate factors of personality items (affective regulation, behavioural regulation and engagement) and one superordinate factor of items relevant to mental state (restlessness and range of thought). Despite the similarity in structure, the content of the information obtained from the two interviews was different.

KW - head injury

KW - ratings

KW - relatives

KW - awareness

KW - validity

KW - traits

U2 - 10.1136/jnnp.2004.052654

DO - 10.1136/jnnp.2004.052654

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 1239

EP - 1247

JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

SN - 0022-3050

IS - 11

ER -