A new hammer to crack an old nut: interspecific competitive resource capture by plants is regulated by nutrient supply, not climate

Clare J Trinder, Rob W Brooker, Hazel Davidson, David Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although rarely acknowledged, our understanding of how competition is modulated by environmental drivers is severely hampered by our dependence on indirect measurements of outcomes, rather than the process of competition. To overcome this, we made direct measurements of plant competition for soil nitrogen (N). Using isotope pool-dilution, we examined the interactive effects of soil resource limitation and climatic severity between two common grassland species. Pool-dilution estimates the uptake of total N over a defined time period, rather than simply the uptake of (15)N label, as used in most other tracer experiments. Competitive uptake of N was determined by its available form (NO(3) (-) or NH(4) (+)). Soil N availability had a greater effect than the climatic conditions (location) under which plants grew. The results did not entirely support either of the main current theories relating the role of competition to environmental conditions. We found no evidence for Tilman's theory that competition for soil nutrients is stronger at low, compared with high nutrient levels and partial support for Grime's theory that competition for soil nutrients is greater under potentially more productive conditions. These results provide novel insights by demonstrating the dynamic nature of plant resource competition.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere29413
Number of pages10
JournalPloS ONE
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Nuts
Hammers
Climate
nuts
Nutrients
Soil
Cracks
climate
uptake mechanisms
Food
soil nutrients
nutrients
Soils
plant competition
soil resources
tracer techniques
soil
isotopes
Dilution
grasslands

Cite this

A new hammer to crack an old nut : interspecific competitive resource capture by plants is regulated by nutrient supply, not climate. / Trinder, Clare J; Brooker, Rob W; Davidson, Hazel; Robinson, David.

In: PloS ONE, Vol. 7, No. 1, e29413, 11.01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trinder, Clare J ; Brooker, Rob W ; Davidson, Hazel ; Robinson, David. / A new hammer to crack an old nut : interspecific competitive resource capture by plants is regulated by nutrient supply, not climate. In: PloS ONE. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 1.
@article{d2cc856cab404f99bca33a28eaa93b29,
title = "A new hammer to crack an old nut: interspecific competitive resource capture by plants is regulated by nutrient supply, not climate",
abstract = "Although rarely acknowledged, our understanding of how competition is modulated by environmental drivers is severely hampered by our dependence on indirect measurements of outcomes, rather than the process of competition. To overcome this, we made direct measurements of plant competition for soil nitrogen (N). Using isotope pool-dilution, we examined the interactive effects of soil resource limitation and climatic severity between two common grassland species. Pool-dilution estimates the uptake of total N over a defined time period, rather than simply the uptake of (15)N label, as used in most other tracer experiments. Competitive uptake of N was determined by its available form (NO(3) (-) or NH(4) (+)). Soil N availability had a greater effect than the climatic conditions (location) under which plants grew. The results did not entirely support either of the main current theories relating the role of competition to environmental conditions. We found no evidence for Tilman's theory that competition for soil nutrients is stronger at low, compared with high nutrient levels and partial support for Grime's theory that competition for soil nutrients is greater under potentially more productive conditions. These results provide novel insights by demonstrating the dynamic nature of plant resource competition.",
author = "Trinder, {Clare J} and Brooker, {Rob W} and Hazel Davidson and David Robinson",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0029413",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "PloS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new hammer to crack an old nut

T2 - interspecific competitive resource capture by plants is regulated by nutrient supply, not climate

AU - Trinder, Clare J

AU - Brooker, Rob W

AU - Davidson, Hazel

AU - Robinson, David

PY - 2012/1/11

Y1 - 2012/1/11

N2 - Although rarely acknowledged, our understanding of how competition is modulated by environmental drivers is severely hampered by our dependence on indirect measurements of outcomes, rather than the process of competition. To overcome this, we made direct measurements of plant competition for soil nitrogen (N). Using isotope pool-dilution, we examined the interactive effects of soil resource limitation and climatic severity between two common grassland species. Pool-dilution estimates the uptake of total N over a defined time period, rather than simply the uptake of (15)N label, as used in most other tracer experiments. Competitive uptake of N was determined by its available form (NO(3) (-) or NH(4) (+)). Soil N availability had a greater effect than the climatic conditions (location) under which plants grew. The results did not entirely support either of the main current theories relating the role of competition to environmental conditions. We found no evidence for Tilman's theory that competition for soil nutrients is stronger at low, compared with high nutrient levels and partial support for Grime's theory that competition for soil nutrients is greater under potentially more productive conditions. These results provide novel insights by demonstrating the dynamic nature of plant resource competition.

AB - Although rarely acknowledged, our understanding of how competition is modulated by environmental drivers is severely hampered by our dependence on indirect measurements of outcomes, rather than the process of competition. To overcome this, we made direct measurements of plant competition for soil nitrogen (N). Using isotope pool-dilution, we examined the interactive effects of soil resource limitation and climatic severity between two common grassland species. Pool-dilution estimates the uptake of total N over a defined time period, rather than simply the uptake of (15)N label, as used in most other tracer experiments. Competitive uptake of N was determined by its available form (NO(3) (-) or NH(4) (+)). Soil N availability had a greater effect than the climatic conditions (location) under which plants grew. The results did not entirely support either of the main current theories relating the role of competition to environmental conditions. We found no evidence for Tilman's theory that competition for soil nutrients is stronger at low, compared with high nutrient levels and partial support for Grime's theory that competition for soil nutrients is greater under potentially more productive conditions. These results provide novel insights by demonstrating the dynamic nature of plant resource competition.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0029413

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0029413

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - PloS ONE

JF - PloS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

M1 - e29413

ER -