A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic

P Purasiri, M Abdalla, Steven Darryll Heys, A K AhSee, M E McKean, Fiona Jane Gilbert, Gillian Needham, Heather Deans, O Eremin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions has been retrospectively assessed in 603 patients who attended the Professorial Breast Clinic and then underwent surgical biopsy, in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, between January 1989 and September 1992. In this series of patients, FNA cytology gave the highest overall prediction of malignancy (92.6%) with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 98%, whilst ultrasonography gave the lowest correct overall prediction (75.6%), with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 79%. Using all the available findings (clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, FNA) as well as the patients' age, a stepwise logistic discriminant analysis was used to derive a mathematical equation for use as a novel diagnostic index. Weighted scores, derived from each variable, were used in the discriminant equation to predict the likelihood of malignancy in patients of different ages (>90%). For young patients (<35 years) the discriminant analysis predicted the diagnosis in 98% of women correctly. Quadruple assessment provides an opportunity for establishing the likely diagnosis in most patients the same day they visit the Breast Clinic. The diagnostic index, currently being evaluated prospectively in our breast clinic, may be a further aid to establishing a correct diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-34
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Volume41
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1996

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • breast clinic
  • diagnostic index
  • FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION
  • CANCER
  • MAMMOGRAPHY
  • ULTRASOUND
  • CYTOLOGY
  • MICROCALCIFICATION
  • MANAGEMENT
  • CARCINOMA
  • fine-needle aspiration
  • cancer
  • mammography
  • ultrasound
  • cytology
  • microcalcification
  • management
  • carcinoma

Cite this

Purasiri, P., Abdalla, M., Heys, S. D., AhSee, A. K., McKean, M. E., Gilbert, F. J., ... Eremin, O. (1996). A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 41(1), 30-34.

A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic. / Purasiri, P ; Abdalla, M ; Heys, Steven Darryll; AhSee, A K ; McKean, M E ; Gilbert, Fiona Jane; Needham, Gillian; Deans, Heather; Eremin, O .

In: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Vol. 41, No. 1, 02.1996, p. 30-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Purasiri, P, Abdalla, M, Heys, SD, AhSee, AK, McKean, ME, Gilbert, FJ, Needham, G, Deans, H & Eremin, O 1996, 'A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic', Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 30-34.
Purasiri P, Abdalla M, Heys SD, AhSee AK, McKean ME, Gilbert FJ et al. A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 1996 Feb;41(1):30-34.
Purasiri, P ; Abdalla, M ; Heys, Steven Darryll ; AhSee, A K ; McKean, M E ; Gilbert, Fiona Jane ; Needham, Gillian ; Deans, Heather ; Eremin, O . / A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic. In: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 1996 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 30-34.
@article{8718f249d2814167bef665bc11afc5da,
title = "A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic",
abstract = "The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions has been retrospectively assessed in 603 patients who attended the Professorial Breast Clinic and then underwent surgical biopsy, in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, between January 1989 and September 1992. In this series of patients, FNA cytology gave the highest overall prediction of malignancy (92.6{\%}) with a sensitivity of 87{\%} and a specificity of 98{\%}, whilst ultrasonography gave the lowest correct overall prediction (75.6{\%}), with a sensitivity of 70{\%} and a specificity of 79{\%}. Using all the available findings (clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, FNA) as well as the patients' age, a stepwise logistic discriminant analysis was used to derive a mathematical equation for use as a novel diagnostic index. Weighted scores, derived from each variable, were used in the discriminant equation to predict the likelihood of malignancy in patients of different ages (>90{\%}). For young patients (<35 years) the discriminant analysis predicted the diagnosis in 98{\%} of women correctly. Quadruple assessment provides an opportunity for establishing the likely diagnosis in most patients the same day they visit the Breast Clinic. The diagnostic index, currently being evaluated prospectively in our breast clinic, may be a further aid to establishing a correct diagnosis.",
keywords = "breast cancer, breast clinic, diagnostic index, FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION, CANCER, MAMMOGRAPHY, ULTRASOUND, CYTOLOGY, MICROCALCIFICATION, MANAGEMENT, CARCINOMA, fine-needle aspiration, cancer, mammography, ultrasound , cytology, microcalcification, management, carcinoma",
author = "P Purasiri and M Abdalla and Heys, {Steven Darryll} and AhSee, {A K} and McKean, {M E} and Gilbert, {Fiona Jane} and Gillian Needham and Heather Deans and O Eremin",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "30--34",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
issn = "0035-8835",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic

AU - Purasiri, P

AU - Abdalla, M

AU - Heys, Steven Darryll

AU - AhSee, A K

AU - McKean, M E

AU - Gilbert, Fiona Jane

AU - Needham, Gillian

AU - Deans, Heather

AU - Eremin, O

PY - 1996/2

Y1 - 1996/2

N2 - The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions has been retrospectively assessed in 603 patients who attended the Professorial Breast Clinic and then underwent surgical biopsy, in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, between January 1989 and September 1992. In this series of patients, FNA cytology gave the highest overall prediction of malignancy (92.6%) with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 98%, whilst ultrasonography gave the lowest correct overall prediction (75.6%), with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 79%. Using all the available findings (clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, FNA) as well as the patients' age, a stepwise logistic discriminant analysis was used to derive a mathematical equation for use as a novel diagnostic index. Weighted scores, derived from each variable, were used in the discriminant equation to predict the likelihood of malignancy in patients of different ages (>90%). For young patients (<35 years) the discriminant analysis predicted the diagnosis in 98% of women correctly. Quadruple assessment provides an opportunity for establishing the likely diagnosis in most patients the same day they visit the Breast Clinic. The diagnostic index, currently being evaluated prospectively in our breast clinic, may be a further aid to establishing a correct diagnosis.

AB - The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions has been retrospectively assessed in 603 patients who attended the Professorial Breast Clinic and then underwent surgical biopsy, in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, between January 1989 and September 1992. In this series of patients, FNA cytology gave the highest overall prediction of malignancy (92.6%) with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 98%, whilst ultrasonography gave the lowest correct overall prediction (75.6%), with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 79%. Using all the available findings (clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, FNA) as well as the patients' age, a stepwise logistic discriminant analysis was used to derive a mathematical equation for use as a novel diagnostic index. Weighted scores, derived from each variable, were used in the discriminant equation to predict the likelihood of malignancy in patients of different ages (>90%). For young patients (<35 years) the discriminant analysis predicted the diagnosis in 98% of women correctly. Quadruple assessment provides an opportunity for establishing the likely diagnosis in most patients the same day they visit the Breast Clinic. The diagnostic index, currently being evaluated prospectively in our breast clinic, may be a further aid to establishing a correct diagnosis.

KW - breast cancer

KW - breast clinic

KW - diagnostic index

KW - FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION

KW - CANCER

KW - MAMMOGRAPHY

KW - ULTRASOUND

KW - CYTOLOGY

KW - MICROCALCIFICATION

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - CARCINOMA

KW - fine-needle aspiration

KW - cancer

KW - mammography

KW - ultrasound

KW - cytology

KW - microcalcification

KW - management

KW - carcinoma

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 30

EP - 34

JO - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

JF - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

SN - 0035-8835

IS - 1

ER -