A perspective on the Rome Statute's defence of duress: The role of imminence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


The concept of duress encapsulated in Article 31(1)(d) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court is a novel inclusion in a statute created to allow prosecution of serious crimes against the person in international criminal law. Despite being the topic of much debate, the present state of the discourse remains at a fairly superficial level: existing studies focus on a general analysis of the defence and its conditions. This has included the way in which the defences merges necessity and duress, with only a few authors examining the conditions of ‘proportionality’ and ‘necessity.’ This study looks at an underexplored part of the defence: the condition of imminence. The purpose of this work is to explore the idea of imminence and to review whether a clearer definition of duress could have been used, replacing the idea of imminence with the concept of the individual selecting the lesser evil.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-177
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Criminal Law Review
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'A perspective on the Rome Statute's defence of duress: The role of imminence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this