A pilot survey of decisions by acute medicine staff after thunderclap headache

B Dobb, J Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Traditionally, neurologically pristine patients with a thunderclap headache are investigated with a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) brain scan, which if negative is followed by a lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude important secondary causes, particularly subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, misdiagnosis of such patients is still a cause of significant human and financial cost and a regular reason for medical litigation. This study explores the approach of emergency medicine and acute medicine clinicians to the investigation of a patient with thunderclap headache.

METHODS: Clinicians were invited to complete an online survey based on a clinical vignette of a 45-year-old man presenting with a thunderclap headache who had a pristine neurological examination.

RESULTS: A total of 160 clinicians responded. The majority (89%) elected to perform a non-contrast CT brain as their first investigation, though five clinicians discharged the patient without investigation. If the CT was negative, only 84% would then proceed to LP, but 20% would undertake this investigation before 12 hours from headache onset.

CONCLUSIONS: Most clinicians investigate neurologically intact patients with thunderclap headache following a CT/LP strategy, but deviations from recommended practice are common.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-214
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

medicine
staff
brain
cause
online survey
examination
costs

Keywords

  • Brain
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid
  • Data Collection
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Headache Disorders, Primary
  • Humans
  • Intracranial Aneurysm
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Physician's Practice Patterns
  • Spinal Puncture
  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Survey
  • Thunderclap Headache

Cite this

A pilot survey of decisions by acute medicine staff after thunderclap headache. / Dobb, B; Cooper, J.

In: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2013, p. 207-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ddd39664e2194dc9bc81f897fe8c6b8e,
title = "A pilot survey of decisions by acute medicine staff after thunderclap headache",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Traditionally, neurologically pristine patients with a thunderclap headache are investigated with a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) brain scan, which if negative is followed by a lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude important secondary causes, particularly subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, misdiagnosis of such patients is still a cause of significant human and financial cost and a regular reason for medical litigation. This study explores the approach of emergency medicine and acute medicine clinicians to the investigation of a patient with thunderclap headache.METHODS: Clinicians were invited to complete an online survey based on a clinical vignette of a 45-year-old man presenting with a thunderclap headache who had a pristine neurological examination.RESULTS: A total of 160 clinicians responded. The majority (89{\%}) elected to perform a non-contrast CT brain as their first investigation, though five clinicians discharged the patient without investigation. If the CT was negative, only 84{\%} would then proceed to LP, but 20{\%} would undertake this investigation before 12 hours from headache onset.CONCLUSIONS: Most clinicians investigate neurologically intact patients with thunderclap headache following a CT/LP strategy, but deviations from recommended practice are common.",
keywords = "Brain, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Data Collection, Diagnosis, Differential, Headache Disorders, Primary, Humans, Intracranial Aneurysm, Male, Middle Aged, Physician's Practice Patterns, Spinal Puncture, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Survey, Thunderclap Headache",
author = "B Dobb and J Cooper",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.4997/JRCPE.2013.304",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "207--214",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
issn = "1478-2715",
publisher = "Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pilot survey of decisions by acute medicine staff after thunderclap headache

AU - Dobb, B

AU - Cooper, J

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Traditionally, neurologically pristine patients with a thunderclap headache are investigated with a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) brain scan, which if negative is followed by a lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude important secondary causes, particularly subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, misdiagnosis of such patients is still a cause of significant human and financial cost and a regular reason for medical litigation. This study explores the approach of emergency medicine and acute medicine clinicians to the investigation of a patient with thunderclap headache.METHODS: Clinicians were invited to complete an online survey based on a clinical vignette of a 45-year-old man presenting with a thunderclap headache who had a pristine neurological examination.RESULTS: A total of 160 clinicians responded. The majority (89%) elected to perform a non-contrast CT brain as their first investigation, though five clinicians discharged the patient without investigation. If the CT was negative, only 84% would then proceed to LP, but 20% would undertake this investigation before 12 hours from headache onset.CONCLUSIONS: Most clinicians investigate neurologically intact patients with thunderclap headache following a CT/LP strategy, but deviations from recommended practice are common.

AB - INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Traditionally, neurologically pristine patients with a thunderclap headache are investigated with a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) brain scan, which if negative is followed by a lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude important secondary causes, particularly subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, misdiagnosis of such patients is still a cause of significant human and financial cost and a regular reason for medical litigation. This study explores the approach of emergency medicine and acute medicine clinicians to the investigation of a patient with thunderclap headache.METHODS: Clinicians were invited to complete an online survey based on a clinical vignette of a 45-year-old man presenting with a thunderclap headache who had a pristine neurological examination.RESULTS: A total of 160 clinicians responded. The majority (89%) elected to perform a non-contrast CT brain as their first investigation, though five clinicians discharged the patient without investigation. If the CT was negative, only 84% would then proceed to LP, but 20% would undertake this investigation before 12 hours from headache onset.CONCLUSIONS: Most clinicians investigate neurologically intact patients with thunderclap headache following a CT/LP strategy, but deviations from recommended practice are common.

KW - Brain

KW - Cerebrospinal Fluid

KW - Data Collection

KW - Diagnosis, Differential

KW - Headache Disorders, Primary

KW - Humans

KW - Intracranial Aneurysm

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Physician's Practice Patterns

KW - Spinal Puncture

KW - Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed

KW - Survey

KW - Thunderclap Headache

U2 - 10.4997/JRCPE.2013.304

DO - 10.4997/JRCPE.2013.304

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 207

EP - 214

JO - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

JF - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

SN - 1478-2715

IS - 3

ER -