A Post-National EU?

The Problem of Legitimising the EU without the Nation and National Representation

Andrew Richard Glencross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores whether the supranational EU polity can be legitimised without the nation state. It claims that modern political representation depends on establishing a tripartite distinction between state, government and civil society. This is contrasted with competing notions of the modern state, notably Rousseau's idea of popular sovereignty and the Jacobin notion of ‘immediate democracy’. The tripartite system, it is argued, enhances three crucial components of democratic legitimacy: governing, sanctioning and mandating accountability. Within this framework, the idea of the nation and the associated national narrative is shown to benefit democratic legitimacy by providing a trans-generational concept of the common good to which government can be held accountable. Since the EU does not fit this model, two approaches have been touted to legitimise this supranational polity in a post-national manner: democratic governance and constitutional patriotism. Yet both are highly problematic forms of engendering legitimacy. Governance offers no guarantees as to how and why citizens will be better represented and does away with the idea of a common good. Constitutional patriotism presupposes the prior acquiescence of nation states to EU integration without problematising how such acquiescence is mandated. Thus the maintenance of a genuinely post-national polity – one that does not recreate the division between state, government and people – depends on the ability to incorporate EU integration into evolving national narratives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)348-367
Number of pages20
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume59
Issue number2
Early online date14 Sep 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

EU
legitimacy
patriotism
nation state
Jacobin
governance
narrative
common good
sovereignty
civil society
guarantee
democracy
citizen
responsibility
ability

Cite this

A Post-National EU? The Problem of Legitimising the EU without the Nation and National Representation. / Glencross, Andrew Richard.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 59, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 348-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a714dbe399b467a98a7dd7e917f70a9,
title = "A Post-National EU?: The Problem of Legitimising the EU without the Nation and National Representation",
abstract = "This article explores whether the supranational EU polity can be legitimised without the nation state. It claims that modern political representation depends on establishing a tripartite distinction between state, government and civil society. This is contrasted with competing notions of the modern state, notably Rousseau's idea of popular sovereignty and the Jacobin notion of ‘immediate democracy’. The tripartite system, it is argued, enhances three crucial components of democratic legitimacy: governing, sanctioning and mandating accountability. Within this framework, the idea of the nation and the associated national narrative is shown to benefit democratic legitimacy by providing a trans-generational concept of the common good to which government can be held accountable. Since the EU does not fit this model, two approaches have been touted to legitimise this supranational polity in a post-national manner: democratic governance and constitutional patriotism. Yet both are highly problematic forms of engendering legitimacy. Governance offers no guarantees as to how and why citizens will be better represented and does away with the idea of a common good. Constitutional patriotism presupposes the prior acquiescence of nation states to EU integration without problematising how such acquiescence is mandated. Thus the maintenance of a genuinely post-national polity – one that does not recreate the division between state, government and people – depends on the ability to incorporate EU integration into evolving national narratives.",
author = "Glencross, {Andrew Richard}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00856.x",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "348--367",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Post-National EU?

T2 - The Problem of Legitimising the EU without the Nation and National Representation

AU - Glencross, Andrew Richard

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - This article explores whether the supranational EU polity can be legitimised without the nation state. It claims that modern political representation depends on establishing a tripartite distinction between state, government and civil society. This is contrasted with competing notions of the modern state, notably Rousseau's idea of popular sovereignty and the Jacobin notion of ‘immediate democracy’. The tripartite system, it is argued, enhances three crucial components of democratic legitimacy: governing, sanctioning and mandating accountability. Within this framework, the idea of the nation and the associated national narrative is shown to benefit democratic legitimacy by providing a trans-generational concept of the common good to which government can be held accountable. Since the EU does not fit this model, two approaches have been touted to legitimise this supranational polity in a post-national manner: democratic governance and constitutional patriotism. Yet both are highly problematic forms of engendering legitimacy. Governance offers no guarantees as to how and why citizens will be better represented and does away with the idea of a common good. Constitutional patriotism presupposes the prior acquiescence of nation states to EU integration without problematising how such acquiescence is mandated. Thus the maintenance of a genuinely post-national polity – one that does not recreate the division between state, government and people – depends on the ability to incorporate EU integration into evolving national narratives.

AB - This article explores whether the supranational EU polity can be legitimised without the nation state. It claims that modern political representation depends on establishing a tripartite distinction between state, government and civil society. This is contrasted with competing notions of the modern state, notably Rousseau's idea of popular sovereignty and the Jacobin notion of ‘immediate democracy’. The tripartite system, it is argued, enhances three crucial components of democratic legitimacy: governing, sanctioning and mandating accountability. Within this framework, the idea of the nation and the associated national narrative is shown to benefit democratic legitimacy by providing a trans-generational concept of the common good to which government can be held accountable. Since the EU does not fit this model, two approaches have been touted to legitimise this supranational polity in a post-national manner: democratic governance and constitutional patriotism. Yet both are highly problematic forms of engendering legitimacy. Governance offers no guarantees as to how and why citizens will be better represented and does away with the idea of a common good. Constitutional patriotism presupposes the prior acquiescence of nation states to EU integration without problematising how such acquiescence is mandated. Thus the maintenance of a genuinely post-national polity – one that does not recreate the division between state, government and people – depends on the ability to incorporate EU integration into evolving national narratives.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00856.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00856.x

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 348

EP - 367

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 2

ER -