A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse

Carol Bugge, Brian Williams, Suzanne Hagen, Janet Logan, Cathryn Glazener, Stewart Pringle, Lesley Sinclair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Current Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on complex interventions advocates pilot trials and feasibility studies as part of a phased approach to the development, testing, and evaluation of healthcare interventions. In this paper we discuss the results of a recent feasibility study and pilot trial for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01136889). The ways in which researchers decide to respond to the results of feasibility work may have significant repercussions for both the nature and degree of tension between internal and external validity in a definitive trial.
Original languageEnglish
Article number353
Number of pages13
JournalTrials
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Feasibility Studies
Decision Making
Pelvic Floor
Prolapse
Biomedical Research
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Muscles

Keywords

  • complex intervention
  • pilot trial
  • feasibility study
  • methodology
  • pelvic organ

Cite this

A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT) : development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse. / Bugge, Carol; Williams, Brian; Hagen, Suzanne; Logan, Janet; Glazener, Cathryn; Pringle, Stewart; Sinclair, Lesley.

In: Trials, Vol. 14, 353, 25.10.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b9c7e2bec2e4ce89f1c4419f10179f7,
title = "A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse",
abstract = "Current Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on complex interventions advocates pilot trials and feasibility studies as part of a phased approach to the development, testing, and evaluation of healthcare interventions. In this paper we discuss the results of a recent feasibility study and pilot trial for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01136889). The ways in which researchers decide to respond to the results of feasibility work may have significant repercussions for both the nature and degree of tension between internal and external validity in a definitive trial.",
keywords = "complex intervention, pilot trial, feasibility study, methodology, pelvic organ",
author = "Carol Bugge and Brian Williams and Suzanne Hagen and Janet Logan and Cathryn Glazener and Stewart Pringle and Lesley Sinclair",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-14-353",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT)

T2 - development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse

AU - Bugge, Carol

AU - Williams, Brian

AU - Hagen, Suzanne

AU - Logan, Janet

AU - Glazener, Cathryn

AU - Pringle, Stewart

AU - Sinclair, Lesley

PY - 2013/10/25

Y1 - 2013/10/25

N2 - Current Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on complex interventions advocates pilot trials and feasibility studies as part of a phased approach to the development, testing, and evaluation of healthcare interventions. In this paper we discuss the results of a recent feasibility study and pilot trial for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01136889). The ways in which researchers decide to respond to the results of feasibility work may have significant repercussions for both the nature and degree of tension between internal and external validity in a definitive trial.

AB - Current Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on complex interventions advocates pilot trials and feasibility studies as part of a phased approach to the development, testing, and evaluation of healthcare interventions. In this paper we discuss the results of a recent feasibility study and pilot trial for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01136889). The ways in which researchers decide to respond to the results of feasibility work may have significant repercussions for both the nature and degree of tension between internal and external validity in a definitive trial.

KW - complex intervention

KW - pilot trial

KW - feasibility study

KW - methodology

KW - pelvic organ

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-353

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-353

M3 - Article

C2 - 24160371

VL - 14

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

M1 - 353

ER -