A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial

Jonathan A Cook, Craig R Ramsay, Andrew J Carr, Jonathan L Rees, UKUFF trial group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Surgeons gain expertise as they repeatedly conduct a procedure. Such learning is widely acknowledged to pose a challenge to evaluating new surgical procedures. Most surgical trials report little if any information on learning. We elicited surgeons’ belief regarding learning within the context of a randomised trial which assessed two surgical procedures.

Materials and Methods: Surgeons participating in the UKUFF trial were sent a postal questionnaire requesting details on current practice, prior experience and their belief regarding acquiring proficiency and the learning curve of operation time for two surgical procedures (open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair).

Results: In total 52 (58%) participating surgeons returned a completed questionnaire. The median (IQR) number of procedures required to acquire proficiency were 17 (10,23) and 35 (23,50) for the open and arthroscopic repairs respectively. The distribution of surgeons’ belief regarding the initial point had median (IQR) of 109 (69,128) and 145 (97,171) minutes for open and arthroscopic repair respectively. Corresponding values for the plateau point were 60 (46, 82) and 79 (58, 110).

Conclusions: We have shown that information on the current practice, prior experience and beliefs on the learning process of a surgical procedure can be elicited using a short questionnaire. The approach could aid the interpretation of trial results in terms of generalisability and be used a priori in the design of a trial.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere49178
Number of pages4
JournalPloS ONE
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Nov 2012

Fingerprint

surgeons
Repair
questionnaires
learning
Learning
surgery
Rotator Cuff
Learning Curve
Arthroscopy
plateaus
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial. / Cook, Jonathan A; Ramsay, Craig R; Carr, Andrew J; Rees, Jonathan L; UKUFF trial group.

In: PloS ONE, Vol. 7, No. 11, e49178, 08.11.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cook, Jonathan A ; Ramsay, Craig R ; Carr, Andrew J ; Rees, Jonathan L ; UKUFF trial group. / A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial. In: PloS ONE. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 11.
@article{2ddd9600a8a143b39fb8bcd9b2c0484f,
title = "A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial",
abstract = "Introduction: Surgeons gain expertise as they repeatedly conduct a procedure. Such learning is widely acknowledged to pose a challenge to evaluating new surgical procedures. Most surgical trials report little if any information on learning. We elicited surgeons’ belief regarding learning within the context of a randomised trial which assessed two surgical procedures.Materials and Methods: Surgeons participating in the UKUFF trial were sent a postal questionnaire requesting details on current practice, prior experience and their belief regarding acquiring proficiency and the learning curve of operation time for two surgical procedures (open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair).Results: In total 52 (58{\%}) participating surgeons returned a completed questionnaire. The median (IQR) number of procedures required to acquire proficiency were 17 (10,23) and 35 (23,50) for the open and arthroscopic repairs respectively. The distribution of surgeons’ belief regarding the initial point had median (IQR) of 109 (69,128) and 145 (97,171) minutes for open and arthroscopic repair respectively. Corresponding values for the plateau point were 60 (46, 82) and 79 (58, 110).Conclusions: We have shown that information on the current practice, prior experience and beliefs on the learning process of a surgical procedure can be elicited using a short questionnaire. The approach could aid the interpretation of trial results in terms of generalisability and be used a priori in the design of a trial.",
author = "Cook, {Jonathan A} and Ramsay, {Craig R} and Carr, {Andrew J} and Rees, {Jonathan L} and {UKUFF trial group}",
note = "PMID: 23145113 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] PMCID: PMC3493499 Free PMC Article",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0049178",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "PloS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons' belief about learning within a surgical trial

AU - Cook, Jonathan A

AU - Ramsay, Craig R

AU - Carr, Andrew J

AU - Rees, Jonathan L

AU - UKUFF trial group

N1 - PMID: 23145113 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] PMCID: PMC3493499 Free PMC Article

PY - 2012/11/8

Y1 - 2012/11/8

N2 - Introduction: Surgeons gain expertise as they repeatedly conduct a procedure. Such learning is widely acknowledged to pose a challenge to evaluating new surgical procedures. Most surgical trials report little if any information on learning. We elicited surgeons’ belief regarding learning within the context of a randomised trial which assessed two surgical procedures.Materials and Methods: Surgeons participating in the UKUFF trial were sent a postal questionnaire requesting details on current practice, prior experience and their belief regarding acquiring proficiency and the learning curve of operation time for two surgical procedures (open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair).Results: In total 52 (58%) participating surgeons returned a completed questionnaire. The median (IQR) number of procedures required to acquire proficiency were 17 (10,23) and 35 (23,50) for the open and arthroscopic repairs respectively. The distribution of surgeons’ belief regarding the initial point had median (IQR) of 109 (69,128) and 145 (97,171) minutes for open and arthroscopic repair respectively. Corresponding values for the plateau point were 60 (46, 82) and 79 (58, 110).Conclusions: We have shown that information on the current practice, prior experience and beliefs on the learning process of a surgical procedure can be elicited using a short questionnaire. The approach could aid the interpretation of trial results in terms of generalisability and be used a priori in the design of a trial.

AB - Introduction: Surgeons gain expertise as they repeatedly conduct a procedure. Such learning is widely acknowledged to pose a challenge to evaluating new surgical procedures. Most surgical trials report little if any information on learning. We elicited surgeons’ belief regarding learning within the context of a randomised trial which assessed two surgical procedures.Materials and Methods: Surgeons participating in the UKUFF trial were sent a postal questionnaire requesting details on current practice, prior experience and their belief regarding acquiring proficiency and the learning curve of operation time for two surgical procedures (open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair).Results: In total 52 (58%) participating surgeons returned a completed questionnaire. The median (IQR) number of procedures required to acquire proficiency were 17 (10,23) and 35 (23,50) for the open and arthroscopic repairs respectively. The distribution of surgeons’ belief regarding the initial point had median (IQR) of 109 (69,128) and 145 (97,171) minutes for open and arthroscopic repair respectively. Corresponding values for the plateau point were 60 (46, 82) and 79 (58, 110).Conclusions: We have shown that information on the current practice, prior experience and beliefs on the learning process of a surgical procedure can be elicited using a short questionnaire. The approach could aid the interpretation of trial results in terms of generalisability and be used a priori in the design of a trial.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0049178

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0049178

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - PloS ONE

JF - PloS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

M1 - e49178

ER -