A randomised controlled trial of a tailored, multifaceted strategy to promote implementation of a clinical guideline on induced abortion care

R. Foy, Gillian Penney, J. M. Grimshaw, Craig R Ramsay, Anne Elizabeth Walker, Graeme Stewart MacLennan, S. C. Stearns, Lynda McKenzie, A. Glasier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a tailored multifaceted strategy, delivered by a national clinical effectiveness programme, to implement a guideline on induced abortion.

Design Cluster randomised controlled trial.

Setting and participants All 26 hospital gynaecology units in Scotland providing induced abortion care. Intervention Following the identification of barriers to guideline implementation, intervention units received a package comprising audit and feedback, unit educational meetings, dissemination of structured case records and promotion of a patient information booklet. Control units received printed guideline summaries alone.

Main outcome measures Compliance with five key guideline recommendations (primary outcomes) and compliance with other recommendations, patient satisfaction and costs of the implementation strategy (secondary outcomes).

Results No effect was observed for any key recommendation: appointment with a gynaecologist within five days of referral (odds ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 1.58); ascertainment of cervical cytology history (0.93; 0.36 to 2.40); antibiotic prophylaxis or screening for lower genital tract infection (1.70; 0.71 to 5.99); use of misoprostol as an alternative to gemeprost (1.00; 0.27 to 1.77); and offer of contraceptive supplies at discharge (1.11; 0.48 to 2.53). Median pre-intervention compliance was near optimal for antibiotic prophylaxis and misoprostol use. No intervention benefit was observed for any secondary outcome. The intervention costs an average of pound2607 per gynaecology unit.

Conclusions The tailored multifaceted strategy was ineffective. This was possibly attributable to high pre-intervention compliance and the limited impact of the strategy on factors outside the perceived control of clinical staff.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)726-733
Number of pages7
JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume111
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

Keywords

  • AUDIT

Cite this

A randomised controlled trial of a tailored, multifaceted strategy to promote implementation of a clinical guideline on induced abortion care. / Foy, R.; Penney, Gillian; Grimshaw, J. M.; Ramsay, Craig R; Walker, Anne Elizabeth; MacLennan, Graeme Stewart; Stearns, S. C.; McKenzie, Lynda; Glasier, A.

In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 111, No. 7, 07.2004, p. 726-733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{54e775b924e742e7955fab101527ef3d,
title = "A randomised controlled trial of a tailored, multifaceted strategy to promote implementation of a clinical guideline on induced abortion care",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a tailored multifaceted strategy, delivered by a national clinical effectiveness programme, to implement a guideline on induced abortion.Design Cluster randomised controlled trial.Setting and participants All 26 hospital gynaecology units in Scotland providing induced abortion care. Intervention Following the identification of barriers to guideline implementation, intervention units received a package comprising audit and feedback, unit educational meetings, dissemination of structured case records and promotion of a patient information booklet. Control units received printed guideline summaries alone.Main outcome measures Compliance with five key guideline recommendations (primary outcomes) and compliance with other recommendations, patient satisfaction and costs of the implementation strategy (secondary outcomes).Results No effect was observed for any key recommendation: appointment with a gynaecologist within five days of referral (odds ratio 0.89; 95{\%} confidence interval 0.50 to 1.58); ascertainment of cervical cytology history (0.93; 0.36 to 2.40); antibiotic prophylaxis or screening for lower genital tract infection (1.70; 0.71 to 5.99); use of misoprostol as an alternative to gemeprost (1.00; 0.27 to 1.77); and offer of contraceptive supplies at discharge (1.11; 0.48 to 2.53). Median pre-intervention compliance was near optimal for antibiotic prophylaxis and misoprostol use. No intervention benefit was observed for any secondary outcome. The intervention costs an average of pound2607 per gynaecology unit.Conclusions The tailored multifaceted strategy was ineffective. This was possibly attributable to high pre-intervention compliance and the limited impact of the strategy on factors outside the perceived control of clinical staff.",
keywords = "AUDIT",
author = "R. Foy and Gillian Penney and Grimshaw, {J. M.} and Ramsay, {Craig R} and Walker, {Anne Elizabeth} and MacLennan, {Graeme Stewart} and Stearns, {S. C.} and Lynda McKenzie and A. Glasier",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00168.x",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "726--733",
journal = "BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised controlled trial of a tailored, multifaceted strategy to promote implementation of a clinical guideline on induced abortion care

AU - Foy, R.

AU - Penney, Gillian

AU - Grimshaw, J. M.

AU - Ramsay, Craig R

AU - Walker, Anne Elizabeth

AU - MacLennan, Graeme Stewart

AU - Stearns, S. C.

AU - McKenzie, Lynda

AU - Glasier, A.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a tailored multifaceted strategy, delivered by a national clinical effectiveness programme, to implement a guideline on induced abortion.Design Cluster randomised controlled trial.Setting and participants All 26 hospital gynaecology units in Scotland providing induced abortion care. Intervention Following the identification of barriers to guideline implementation, intervention units received a package comprising audit and feedback, unit educational meetings, dissemination of structured case records and promotion of a patient information booklet. Control units received printed guideline summaries alone.Main outcome measures Compliance with five key guideline recommendations (primary outcomes) and compliance with other recommendations, patient satisfaction and costs of the implementation strategy (secondary outcomes).Results No effect was observed for any key recommendation: appointment with a gynaecologist within five days of referral (odds ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 1.58); ascertainment of cervical cytology history (0.93; 0.36 to 2.40); antibiotic prophylaxis or screening for lower genital tract infection (1.70; 0.71 to 5.99); use of misoprostol as an alternative to gemeprost (1.00; 0.27 to 1.77); and offer of contraceptive supplies at discharge (1.11; 0.48 to 2.53). Median pre-intervention compliance was near optimal for antibiotic prophylaxis and misoprostol use. No intervention benefit was observed for any secondary outcome. The intervention costs an average of pound2607 per gynaecology unit.Conclusions The tailored multifaceted strategy was ineffective. This was possibly attributable to high pre-intervention compliance and the limited impact of the strategy on factors outside the perceived control of clinical staff.

AB - Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a tailored multifaceted strategy, delivered by a national clinical effectiveness programme, to implement a guideline on induced abortion.Design Cluster randomised controlled trial.Setting and participants All 26 hospital gynaecology units in Scotland providing induced abortion care. Intervention Following the identification of barriers to guideline implementation, intervention units received a package comprising audit and feedback, unit educational meetings, dissemination of structured case records and promotion of a patient information booklet. Control units received printed guideline summaries alone.Main outcome measures Compliance with five key guideline recommendations (primary outcomes) and compliance with other recommendations, patient satisfaction and costs of the implementation strategy (secondary outcomes).Results No effect was observed for any key recommendation: appointment with a gynaecologist within five days of referral (odds ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 1.58); ascertainment of cervical cytology history (0.93; 0.36 to 2.40); antibiotic prophylaxis or screening for lower genital tract infection (1.70; 0.71 to 5.99); use of misoprostol as an alternative to gemeprost (1.00; 0.27 to 1.77); and offer of contraceptive supplies at discharge (1.11; 0.48 to 2.53). Median pre-intervention compliance was near optimal for antibiotic prophylaxis and misoprostol use. No intervention benefit was observed for any secondary outcome. The intervention costs an average of pound2607 per gynaecology unit.Conclusions The tailored multifaceted strategy was ineffective. This was possibly attributable to high pre-intervention compliance and the limited impact of the strategy on factors outside the perceived control of clinical staff.

KW - AUDIT

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00168.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00168.x

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 726

EP - 733

JO - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 7

ER -