A Religious Repair for Communicative Reason? Habermas's Return to Religion and Its Theological Reception

Christopher Craig Brittain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses the shift in Jürgen Habermas’ writing on religion, and reflects on its significance for theology. The discussion shows that the change in Habermas’ thought is related to his emerging sense that communicative rationality is insufficient to ground moral action. This development is illuminated by demonstrating how Habermas’ more recent work reverses his criticism of the relationship that Horkheimer establishes between the idea of God and the concept of truth. Moreover, tensions in Habermas’ treatment of religion’s “semantic content” are shown to result in what he himself would call a “performative contradiction.” With reference to theological receptions of Habermas by Adams and Junker-Kenny, the paper concludes that the promise of a fruitful dialogue between Habermas and theologians has never been greater, but that such a conversation will be enriched by returning to the writings on religion by the first generation of the Frankfurt School.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-190
Number of pages20
JournalToronto Journal of Theology
Volume30
Issue number2
Early online date11 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Religion
Repair
Reception
Max Horkheimer
Theology
Performative Contradiction
Frankfurt School
Rationality
Thought
Deity
Criticism
Theologians
Semantic Content

Keywords

  • Jürgen Habermas
  • Horkheimer
  • scriptural reasoning
  • Adams
  • Junker-Kenny

Cite this

A Religious Repair for Communicative Reason? Habermas's Return to Religion and Its Theological Reception. / Brittain, Christopher Craig.

In: Toronto Journal of Theology, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2014, p. 171-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{054b4d2ca9cc4feb8533d7b70c2b09b3,
title = "A Religious Repair for Communicative Reason?: Habermas's Return to Religion and Its Theological Reception",
abstract = "This article analyses the shift in J{\"u}rgen Habermas’ writing on religion, and reflects on its significance for theology. The discussion shows that the change in Habermas’ thought is related to his emerging sense that communicative rationality is insufficient to ground moral action. This development is illuminated by demonstrating how Habermas’ more recent work reverses his criticism of the relationship that Horkheimer establishes between the idea of God and the concept of truth. Moreover, tensions in Habermas’ treatment of religion’s “semantic content” are shown to result in what he himself would call a “performative contradiction.” With reference to theological receptions of Habermas by Adams and Junker-Kenny, the paper concludes that the promise of a fruitful dialogue between Habermas and theologians has never been greater, but that such a conversation will be enriched by returning to the writings on religion by the first generation of the Frankfurt School.",
keywords = "J{\"u}rgen Habermas, Horkheimer, scriptural reasoning, Adams, Junker-Kenny",
author = "Brittain, {Christopher Craig}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3138/tjt.2937",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "171--190",
journal = "Toronto Journal of Theology",
issn = "0826-9831",
publisher = "Toronto School of Theology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Religious Repair for Communicative Reason?

T2 - Habermas's Return to Religion and Its Theological Reception

AU - Brittain, Christopher Craig

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article analyses the shift in Jürgen Habermas’ writing on religion, and reflects on its significance for theology. The discussion shows that the change in Habermas’ thought is related to his emerging sense that communicative rationality is insufficient to ground moral action. This development is illuminated by demonstrating how Habermas’ more recent work reverses his criticism of the relationship that Horkheimer establishes between the idea of God and the concept of truth. Moreover, tensions in Habermas’ treatment of religion’s “semantic content” are shown to result in what he himself would call a “performative contradiction.” With reference to theological receptions of Habermas by Adams and Junker-Kenny, the paper concludes that the promise of a fruitful dialogue between Habermas and theologians has never been greater, but that such a conversation will be enriched by returning to the writings on religion by the first generation of the Frankfurt School.

AB - This article analyses the shift in Jürgen Habermas’ writing on religion, and reflects on its significance for theology. The discussion shows that the change in Habermas’ thought is related to his emerging sense that communicative rationality is insufficient to ground moral action. This development is illuminated by demonstrating how Habermas’ more recent work reverses his criticism of the relationship that Horkheimer establishes between the idea of God and the concept of truth. Moreover, tensions in Habermas’ treatment of religion’s “semantic content” are shown to result in what he himself would call a “performative contradiction.” With reference to theological receptions of Habermas by Adams and Junker-Kenny, the paper concludes that the promise of a fruitful dialogue between Habermas and theologians has never been greater, but that such a conversation will be enriched by returning to the writings on religion by the first generation of the Frankfurt School.

KW - Jürgen Habermas

KW - Horkheimer

KW - scriptural reasoning

KW - Adams

KW - Junker-Kenny

U2 - 10.3138/tjt.2937

DO - 10.3138/tjt.2937

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 171

EP - 190

JO - Toronto Journal of Theology

JF - Toronto Journal of Theology

SN - 0826-9831

IS - 2

ER -