A Response to the Criticism against ISDS by EFILA

Gloria Maria Alvarez, Blazej Blasikiewicz, Tabe Van Hoolwerff, Mary Mitsi, Kleopatra Koutouzi, Nikos Lavranos, Emma Spiteri-Gonzi, Adrian Videgaray , Piotr Willinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article analyses the validity of some of the most often-heard criticism against ISDS. It concludes that most of that criticism is neither supported by statistical evidence nor by the practice of international arbitration law. Consequently, this article cautions against the current hyper-activism to reform or even to dismantle some of the salient features of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), and instead, calls for a rational and balanced debate based on facts with a view to improving the ISDS system where necessary in an orderly fashion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-36
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of International Arbitration
Volume33
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

investor
criticism
arbitration
reform
Law
evidence

Keywords

  • ISDS
  • Investor-State arbitration
  • European Union Law
  • European Commission
  • international arbitration
  • international investment law
  • dispute settlement
  • energy law

Cite this

Alvarez, G. M., Blasikiewicz, B., Van Hoolwerff, T., Mitsi, M., Koutouzi, K., Lavranos, N., ... Willinski, P. (2016). A Response to the Criticism against ISDS by EFILA. Journal of International Arbitration , 33(1), 1-36.

A Response to the Criticism against ISDS by EFILA. / Alvarez, Gloria Maria; Blasikiewicz, Blazej ; Van Hoolwerff, Tabe ; Mitsi, Mary ; Koutouzi, Kleopatra; Lavranos, Nikos ; Spiteri-Gonzi, Emma ; Videgaray , Adrian ; Willinski, Piotr.

In: Journal of International Arbitration , Vol. 33, No. 1, 2016, p. 1-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alvarez, GM, Blasikiewicz, B, Van Hoolwerff, T, Mitsi, M, Koutouzi, K, Lavranos, N, Spiteri-Gonzi, E, Videgaray , A & Willinski, P 2016, 'A Response to the Criticism against ISDS by EFILA', Journal of International Arbitration , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1-36.
Alvarez GM, Blasikiewicz B, Van Hoolwerff T, Mitsi M, Koutouzi K, Lavranos N et al. A Response to the Criticism against ISDS by EFILA. Journal of International Arbitration . 2016;33(1):1-36.
Alvarez, Gloria Maria ; Blasikiewicz, Blazej ; Van Hoolwerff, Tabe ; Mitsi, Mary ; Koutouzi, Kleopatra ; Lavranos, Nikos ; Spiteri-Gonzi, Emma ; Videgaray , Adrian ; Willinski, Piotr. / A Response to the Criticism against ISDS by EFILA. In: Journal of International Arbitration . 2016 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 1-36.
@article{2a73feb2fe1641dab770f2392b232038,
title = "A Response to the Criticism against ISDS by EFILA",
abstract = "This article analyses the validity of some of the most often-heard criticism against ISDS. It concludes that most of that criticism is neither supported by statistical evidence nor by the practice of international arbitration law. Consequently, this article cautions against the current hyper-activism to reform or even to dismantle some of the salient features of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), and instead, calls for a rational and balanced debate based on facts with a view to improving the ISDS system where necessary in an orderly fashion.",
keywords = "ISDS, Investor-State arbitration , European Union Law, European Commission , international arbitration , international investment law, dispute settlement , energy law",
author = "Alvarez, {Gloria Maria} and Blazej Blasikiewicz and {Van Hoolwerff}, Tabe and Mary Mitsi and Kleopatra Koutouzi and Nikos Lavranos and Emma Spiteri-Gonzi and Adrian Videgaray and Piotr Willinski",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1--36",
journal = "Journal of International Arbitration",
issn = "0255-8106",
publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Response to the Criticism against ISDS by EFILA

AU - Alvarez, Gloria Maria

AU - Blasikiewicz, Blazej

AU - Van Hoolwerff, Tabe

AU - Mitsi, Mary

AU - Koutouzi, Kleopatra

AU - Lavranos, Nikos

AU - Spiteri-Gonzi, Emma

AU - Videgaray , Adrian

AU - Willinski, Piotr

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article analyses the validity of some of the most often-heard criticism against ISDS. It concludes that most of that criticism is neither supported by statistical evidence nor by the practice of international arbitration law. Consequently, this article cautions against the current hyper-activism to reform or even to dismantle some of the salient features of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), and instead, calls for a rational and balanced debate based on facts with a view to improving the ISDS system where necessary in an orderly fashion.

AB - This article analyses the validity of some of the most often-heard criticism against ISDS. It concludes that most of that criticism is neither supported by statistical evidence nor by the practice of international arbitration law. Consequently, this article cautions against the current hyper-activism to reform or even to dismantle some of the salient features of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), and instead, calls for a rational and balanced debate based on facts with a view to improving the ISDS system where necessary in an orderly fashion.

KW - ISDS

KW - Investor-State arbitration

KW - European Union Law

KW - European Commission

KW - international arbitration

KW - international investment law

KW - dispute settlement

KW - energy law

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1

EP - 36

JO - Journal of International Arbitration

JF - Journal of International Arbitration

SN - 0255-8106

IS - 1

ER -