A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS

Ajay Gambhir* (Corresponding Author), Isabela Butnar, Pei-Hao Li, Pete Smith, Neil Strachan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper reviews the many criticisms that Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)the bedrock of mitigation analysishave received in recent years. Critics have asserted that there is a lack of transparency around model structures and input assumptions, a lack of credibility in those input assumptions that are made visible, an over-reliance on particular technologies and an inadequate representation of real-world policies and processes such as innovation and behaviour change. The paper then reviews the proposals and actions that follow from these criticisms, which fall into three broad categories: scrap the models and use other techniques to set out low-carbon futures; transform them by improving their representation of real-world processes and their transparency; and supplement them with other models and approaches. The article considers the implications of each proposal, through the particular lens of how it would explore the role of a key low-carbon technologybioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), to produce net negative emissions. The paper concludes that IAMs remain critically important in mitigation pathways analysis, because they can encompass a large number of technologies and policies in a consistent framework, but that they should increasingly be supplemented with other models and analytical approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1747
Number of pages21
JournalEnergies
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2019

Keywords

  • integrated assessment models
  • IAMs
  • climate change mitigation
  • BECCS
  • staged accession scenarios
  • breaking climate targets
  • land-use
  • energy-systems
  • tell us
  • policy
  • technologies
  • mitigation
  • economics
  • ampere
  • Climate change mitigation
  • Integrated assessment models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Optimization
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this