A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS

Ajay Gambhir (Corresponding Author), Isabela Butnar, Pei-Hao Li, Pete Smith, Neil Strachan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reviews the many criticisms that Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)the bedrock of mitigation analysishave received in recent years. Critics have asserted that there is a lack of transparency around model structures and input assumptions, a lack of credibility in those input assumptions that are made visible, an over-reliance on particular technologies and an inadequate representation of real-world policies and processes such as innovation and behaviour change. The paper then reviews the proposals and actions that follow from these criticisms, which fall into three broad categories: scrap the models and use other techniques to set out low-carbon futures; transform them by improving their representation of real-world processes and their transparency; and supplement them with other models and approaches. The article considers the implications of each proposal, through the particular lens of how it would explore the role of a key low-carbon technologybioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), to produce net negative emissions. The paper concludes that IAMs remain critically important in mitigation pathways analysis, because they can encompass a large number of technologies and policies in a consistent framework, but that they should increasingly be supplemented with other models and analytical approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1747
Number of pages21
JournalEnergies
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2019

Keywords

  • integrated assessment models
  • IAMs
  • climate change mitigation
  • BECCS
  • staged accession scenarios
  • breaking climate targets
  • land-use
  • energy-systems
  • tell us
  • policy
  • technologies
  • mitigation
  • economics
  • ampere
  • Climate change mitigation
  • Integrated assessment models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Optimization
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS. / Gambhir, Ajay (Corresponding Author); Butnar, Isabela; Li, Pei-Hao; Smith, Pete; Strachan, Neil.

In: Energies, Vol. 12, No. 9, 1747, 08.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gambhir, Ajay ; Butnar, Isabela ; Li, Pei-Hao ; Smith, Pete ; Strachan, Neil. / A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS. In: Energies. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 9.
@article{397704ce24094930a4e9c9d122599e42,
title = "A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS",
abstract = "This paper reviews the many criticisms that Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)the bedrock of mitigation analysishave received in recent years. Critics have asserted that there is a lack of transparency around model structures and input assumptions, a lack of credibility in those input assumptions that are made visible, an over-reliance on particular technologies and an inadequate representation of real-world policies and processes such as innovation and behaviour change. The paper then reviews the proposals and actions that follow from these criticisms, which fall into three broad categories: scrap the models and use other techniques to set out low-carbon futures; transform them by improving their representation of real-world processes and their transparency; and supplement them with other models and approaches. The article considers the implications of each proposal, through the particular lens of how it would explore the role of a key low-carbon technologybioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), to produce net negative emissions. The paper concludes that IAMs remain critically important in mitigation pathways analysis, because they can encompass a large number of technologies and policies in a consistent framework, but that they should increasingly be supplemented with other models and analytical approaches.",
keywords = "integrated assessment models, IAMs, climate change mitigation, BECCS, staged accession scenarios, breaking climate targets, land-use, energy-systems, tell us, policy, technologies, mitigation, economics, ampere, Climate change mitigation, Integrated assessment models",
author = "Ajay Gambhir and Isabela Butnar and Pei-Hao Li and Pete Smith and Neil Strachan",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "8",
doi = "10.3390/en12091747",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Energies",
issn = "1996-1073",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS

AU - Gambhir, Ajay

AU - Butnar, Isabela

AU - Li, Pei-Hao

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Strachan, Neil

PY - 2019/5/8

Y1 - 2019/5/8

N2 - This paper reviews the many criticisms that Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)the bedrock of mitigation analysishave received in recent years. Critics have asserted that there is a lack of transparency around model structures and input assumptions, a lack of credibility in those input assumptions that are made visible, an over-reliance on particular technologies and an inadequate representation of real-world policies and processes such as innovation and behaviour change. The paper then reviews the proposals and actions that follow from these criticisms, which fall into three broad categories: scrap the models and use other techniques to set out low-carbon futures; transform them by improving their representation of real-world processes and their transparency; and supplement them with other models and approaches. The article considers the implications of each proposal, through the particular lens of how it would explore the role of a key low-carbon technologybioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), to produce net negative emissions. The paper concludes that IAMs remain critically important in mitigation pathways analysis, because they can encompass a large number of technologies and policies in a consistent framework, but that they should increasingly be supplemented with other models and analytical approaches.

AB - This paper reviews the many criticisms that Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)the bedrock of mitigation analysishave received in recent years. Critics have asserted that there is a lack of transparency around model structures and input assumptions, a lack of credibility in those input assumptions that are made visible, an over-reliance on particular technologies and an inadequate representation of real-world policies and processes such as innovation and behaviour change. The paper then reviews the proposals and actions that follow from these criticisms, which fall into three broad categories: scrap the models and use other techniques to set out low-carbon futures; transform them by improving their representation of real-world processes and their transparency; and supplement them with other models and approaches. The article considers the implications of each proposal, through the particular lens of how it would explore the role of a key low-carbon technologybioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), to produce net negative emissions. The paper concludes that IAMs remain critically important in mitigation pathways analysis, because they can encompass a large number of technologies and policies in a consistent framework, but that they should increasingly be supplemented with other models and analytical approaches.

KW - integrated assessment models

KW - IAMs

KW - climate change mitigation

KW - BECCS

KW - staged accession scenarios

KW - breaking climate targets

KW - land-use

KW - energy-systems

KW - tell us

KW - policy

KW - technologies

KW - mitigation

KW - economics

KW - ampere

KW - Climate change mitigation

KW - Integrated assessment models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065868335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/review-criticisms-integrated-assessment-models-proposed-approaches-address-these-through-lens-beccs

U2 - 10.3390/en12091747

DO - 10.3390/en12091747

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

JO - Energies

JF - Energies

SN - 1996-1073

IS - 9

M1 - 1747

ER -