A review of the empirical evidence of the value of structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records for direct patient care

Dipak Kalra*, Bernard Fernando, Zoe Jane Morrison, Aziz Sheikh, eHealth Research Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The case has historically been presented that structured and/or coded electronic health records (EHRs) benefit direct patient care, but the evidence base for this is not well documented. 


Methods: We searched for evidence of direct patient care value from the use of structured and/ or coded information within EHRs. We interrogated nine international databases from 1990 to 2011. Value was defined using the Institute of Medicine's six areas for improvement for healthcare systems: effectiveness, safety, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency and equitability. We included studies satisfying the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group criteria. 


Results: Of 5016 potentially eligible papers, 13 studies satisfied our criteria: 10 focused on effectiveness, with eight demonstrating potential for improved proxy and actual clinical outcomes if a structured and/or coded EHR was combined with alerting or advisory systems in a focused clinical domain. Three studies demonstrated improvement in safety outcomes. No studies were found reporting value in relation to patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency or equitability. 


Conclusions: We conclude that, to date, there has been patchy effort to investigate empirically the value from structuring and coding EHRs for direct patient care. Future investments in structuring and coding of EHRs should be informed by robust evidence as to the clinical scenarios in which patient care benefits may be realised.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-180
Number of pages10
JournalInformatics in Primary Care
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Clinical Coding
Patient Care
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Proxy
Insurance Benefits
Patient Safety
Organizations
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Safety

Keywords

  • Clinical coding
  • Clinical outcomes
  • Electronic health records
  • Health information technology
  • Structured data entry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Family Practice
  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

A review of the empirical evidence of the value of structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records for direct patient care. / Kalra, Dipak; Fernando, Bernard; Morrison, Zoe Jane; Sheikh, Aziz; eHealth Research Group.

In: Informatics in Primary Care, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2013, p. 171-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kalra, Dipak ; Fernando, Bernard ; Morrison, Zoe Jane ; Sheikh, Aziz ; eHealth Research Group. / A review of the empirical evidence of the value of structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records for direct patient care. In: Informatics in Primary Care. 2013 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 171-180.
@article{d27c65302bb34d48987ce673766939a9,
title = "A review of the empirical evidence of the value of structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records for direct patient care",
abstract = "Background: The case has historically been presented that structured and/or coded electronic health records (EHRs) benefit direct patient care, but the evidence base for this is not well documented. Methods: We searched for evidence of direct patient care value from the use of structured and/ or coded information within EHRs. We interrogated nine international databases from 1990 to 2011. Value was defined using the Institute of Medicine's six areas for improvement for healthcare systems: effectiveness, safety, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency and equitability. We included studies satisfying the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group criteria. Results: Of 5016 potentially eligible papers, 13 studies satisfied our criteria: 10 focused on effectiveness, with eight demonstrating potential for improved proxy and actual clinical outcomes if a structured and/or coded EHR was combined with alerting or advisory systems in a focused clinical domain. Three studies demonstrated improvement in safety outcomes. No studies were found reporting value in relation to patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency or equitability. Conclusions: We conclude that, to date, there has been patchy effort to investigate empirically the value from structuring and coding EHRs for direct patient care. Future investments in structuring and coding of EHRs should be informed by robust evidence as to the clinical scenarios in which patient care benefits may be realised.",
keywords = "Clinical coding, Clinical outcomes, Electronic health records, Health information technology, Structured data entry",
author = "Dipak Kalra and Bernard Fernando and Morrison, {Zoe Jane} and Aziz Sheikh and {eHealth Research Group}",
note = "FUNDING This work was funded by the English National Health Service (NHS) Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme (NHS CFHEP 009). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NHS CFHEP or the UK Government Department of Health. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the advice on this research, which has been provided by members of the Independent Project Steering Committee overseeing our programme of work into the structuring and/or coding of the clinical record. Chaired by Professor Simon de Lusignan, this group also comprises Dr Nick Booth, Dr Stephen Kay and Lee Priest.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.14236/jhi.v20i3.22",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "171--180",
journal = "Informatics in Primary Care",
issn = "1476-0320",
publisher = "BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the empirical evidence of the value of structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records for direct patient care

AU - Kalra, Dipak

AU - Fernando, Bernard

AU - Morrison, Zoe Jane

AU - Sheikh, Aziz

AU - eHealth Research Group

N1 - FUNDING This work was funded by the English National Health Service (NHS) Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme (NHS CFHEP 009). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NHS CFHEP or the UK Government Department of Health. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the advice on this research, which has been provided by members of the Independent Project Steering Committee overseeing our programme of work into the structuring and/or coding of the clinical record. Chaired by Professor Simon de Lusignan, this group also comprises Dr Nick Booth, Dr Stephen Kay and Lee Priest.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: The case has historically been presented that structured and/or coded electronic health records (EHRs) benefit direct patient care, but the evidence base for this is not well documented. Methods: We searched for evidence of direct patient care value from the use of structured and/ or coded information within EHRs. We interrogated nine international databases from 1990 to 2011. Value was defined using the Institute of Medicine's six areas for improvement for healthcare systems: effectiveness, safety, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency and equitability. We included studies satisfying the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group criteria. Results: Of 5016 potentially eligible papers, 13 studies satisfied our criteria: 10 focused on effectiveness, with eight demonstrating potential for improved proxy and actual clinical outcomes if a structured and/or coded EHR was combined with alerting or advisory systems in a focused clinical domain. Three studies demonstrated improvement in safety outcomes. No studies were found reporting value in relation to patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency or equitability. Conclusions: We conclude that, to date, there has been patchy effort to investigate empirically the value from structuring and coding EHRs for direct patient care. Future investments in structuring and coding of EHRs should be informed by robust evidence as to the clinical scenarios in which patient care benefits may be realised.

AB - Background: The case has historically been presented that structured and/or coded electronic health records (EHRs) benefit direct patient care, but the evidence base for this is not well documented. Methods: We searched for evidence of direct patient care value from the use of structured and/ or coded information within EHRs. We interrogated nine international databases from 1990 to 2011. Value was defined using the Institute of Medicine's six areas for improvement for healthcare systems: effectiveness, safety, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency and equitability. We included studies satisfying the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group criteria. Results: Of 5016 potentially eligible papers, 13 studies satisfied our criteria: 10 focused on effectiveness, with eight demonstrating potential for improved proxy and actual clinical outcomes if a structured and/or coded EHR was combined with alerting or advisory systems in a focused clinical domain. Three studies demonstrated improvement in safety outcomes. No studies were found reporting value in relation to patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency or equitability. Conclusions: We conclude that, to date, there has been patchy effort to investigate empirically the value from structuring and coding EHRs for direct patient care. Future investments in structuring and coding of EHRs should be informed by robust evidence as to the clinical scenarios in which patient care benefits may be realised.

KW - Clinical coding

KW - Clinical outcomes

KW - Electronic health records

KW - Health information technology

KW - Structured data entry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880067871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14236/jhi.v20i3.22

DO - 10.14236/jhi.v20i3.22

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 171

EP - 180

JO - Informatics in Primary Care

JF - Informatics in Primary Care

SN - 1476-0320

IS - 3

ER -