A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective

Elisabeth Roberts*, Brett Anne Anderson, Sarah Skerratt, John Farrington

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper utilises a community resilience framework to critically examine the digital-rural policy agenda. Rural areas are sometimes seen as passive and static, set in contrast to the mobility of urban, technological and globalisation processes (Bell et al., 2010). In response to notions of rural decline (McManus et al., 2012) rural resilience literature posits rural communities as ‘active,’ and ‘proactive’ about their future (Skerratt, 2013), developing processes for building capacity and resources. We bring together rural development and digital policy-related literature, using resilience motifs developed from recent academic literature, including community resilience, digital divides, digital inclusion, and rural information and communication technologies (ICTs). Whilst community broadband initiatives have been linked to resilience (Plunkett-Carnegie, 2012; Heesen et al., 2013) digital inclusion, and engagement with new digital technologies more broadly, have not. We explore this through three resilience motifs: resilience as multi-scalar; as entailing normative assumptions; and as integrated and place-sensitive. We point to normative claims about the capacity of digital technology to aid rural development, to offer solutions to rural service provision and the challenges of implementing localism. Taking the UK as a focus, we explore the various scales at which this is evident, from European to UK country-level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)372-385
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume54
Early online date6 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Fingerprint

rural development
resilience
rural policy
service provision
information and communication technology
information technology
globalization
communications technology
rural communities
capacity building
rural areas
community
rural area
resource
inclusion
digital divide
policy
rural community
communication technology
resources

Keywords

  • Digital inclusion
  • ICTs
  • Policy
  • Resilience
  • Rural development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective. / Roberts, Elisabeth; Anderson, Brett Anne; Skerratt, Sarah; Farrington, John.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 54, 08.2017, p. 372-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roberts, Elisabeth ; Anderson, Brett Anne ; Skerratt, Sarah ; Farrington, John. / A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective. In: Journal of Rural Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 54. pp. 372-385.
@article{11fab695aa8a4d11861e88f8b3b7a062,
title = "A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective",
abstract = "This paper utilises a community resilience framework to critically examine the digital-rural policy agenda. Rural areas are sometimes seen as passive and static, set in contrast to the mobility of urban, technological and globalisation processes (Bell et al., 2010). In response to notions of rural decline (McManus et al., 2012) rural resilience literature posits rural communities as ‘active,’ and ‘proactive’ about their future (Skerratt, 2013), developing processes for building capacity and resources. We bring together rural development and digital policy-related literature, using resilience motifs developed from recent academic literature, including community resilience, digital divides, digital inclusion, and rural information and communication technologies (ICTs). Whilst community broadband initiatives have been linked to resilience (Plunkett-Carnegie, 2012; Heesen et al., 2013) digital inclusion, and engagement with new digital technologies more broadly, have not. We explore this through three resilience motifs: resilience as multi-scalar; as entailing normative assumptions; and as integrated and place-sensitive. We point to normative claims about the capacity of digital technology to aid rural development, to offer solutions to rural service provision and the challenges of implementing localism. Taking the UK as a focus, we explore the various scales at which this is evident, from European to UK country-level.",
keywords = "Digital inclusion, ICTs, Policy, Resilience, Rural development",
author = "Elisabeth Roberts and Anderson, {Brett Anne} and Sarah Skerratt and John Farrington",
note = "Open Access funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "372--385",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective

AU - Roberts, Elisabeth

AU - Anderson, Brett Anne

AU - Skerratt, Sarah

AU - Farrington, John

N1 - Open Access funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - This paper utilises a community resilience framework to critically examine the digital-rural policy agenda. Rural areas are sometimes seen as passive and static, set in contrast to the mobility of urban, technological and globalisation processes (Bell et al., 2010). In response to notions of rural decline (McManus et al., 2012) rural resilience literature posits rural communities as ‘active,’ and ‘proactive’ about their future (Skerratt, 2013), developing processes for building capacity and resources. We bring together rural development and digital policy-related literature, using resilience motifs developed from recent academic literature, including community resilience, digital divides, digital inclusion, and rural information and communication technologies (ICTs). Whilst community broadband initiatives have been linked to resilience (Plunkett-Carnegie, 2012; Heesen et al., 2013) digital inclusion, and engagement with new digital technologies more broadly, have not. We explore this through three resilience motifs: resilience as multi-scalar; as entailing normative assumptions; and as integrated and place-sensitive. We point to normative claims about the capacity of digital technology to aid rural development, to offer solutions to rural service provision and the challenges of implementing localism. Taking the UK as a focus, we explore the various scales at which this is evident, from European to UK country-level.

AB - This paper utilises a community resilience framework to critically examine the digital-rural policy agenda. Rural areas are sometimes seen as passive and static, set in contrast to the mobility of urban, technological and globalisation processes (Bell et al., 2010). In response to notions of rural decline (McManus et al., 2012) rural resilience literature posits rural communities as ‘active,’ and ‘proactive’ about their future (Skerratt, 2013), developing processes for building capacity and resources. We bring together rural development and digital policy-related literature, using resilience motifs developed from recent academic literature, including community resilience, digital divides, digital inclusion, and rural information and communication technologies (ICTs). Whilst community broadband initiatives have been linked to resilience (Plunkett-Carnegie, 2012; Heesen et al., 2013) digital inclusion, and engagement with new digital technologies more broadly, have not. We explore this through three resilience motifs: resilience as multi-scalar; as entailing normative assumptions; and as integrated and place-sensitive. We point to normative claims about the capacity of digital technology to aid rural development, to offer solutions to rural service provision and the challenges of implementing localism. Taking the UK as a focus, we explore the various scales at which this is evident, from European to UK country-level.

KW - Digital inclusion

KW - ICTs

KW - Policy

KW - Resilience

KW - Rural development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965022432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 372

EP - 385

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -