A scoping review of the uses of the care index in children

E Gupta, N Innes, A A Schuller, J H Vermaire, Z Marshman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a scoping review of literature to describe how the care index (CI) and restorative index (RI) are used in child populations and to determine whether they are fit for purpose.

BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Scoping review conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework.

METHOD: Electronic and manual literature searches (1980-2015) were conducted. Titles and abstracts were screened, full-texts of potential studies were reviewed two reviewers extracted data independently, followed by data charting and summarising.

RESULTS: Out of 104 articles meeting all criteria, most were cross-sectional (92%), and 56% were conducted in UK and Brazil. Most commonly (63%) studies used CI and RI to obtain epidemiological data on dental care levels. Of the studies that defined CI and RI, most used and specified the standard definition. The CI and RI scores varied either due to patient related factors such as age, gender or dental care related factors including, cost of treatment and method of provider remuneration.

CONCLUSION: Overall, it is recommended that future studies should clearly state the definitions and thresholds used to obtain CI and RI, which would enable comparison between communities and allow temporal trends to be studied. Additionally, deriving separate CI and RI scores for groups based on caries extent would help to highlight inequalities in the provision of care. Further research is needed to explore the applicability of CI and RI to changing approaches to caries management with current care recommendations emphasising on minimal treatment and secondary prevention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-136
Number of pages6
JournalCommunity Dental Health
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Dental Care
Remuneration
Secondary Prevention
Health Care Costs
Brazil
Research
Population
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Gupta, E., Innes, N., Schuller, A. A., Vermaire, J. H., & Marshman, Z. (2017). A scoping review of the uses of the care index in children. Community Dental Health, 34(3), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_4063Gupta06

A scoping review of the uses of the care index in children. / Gupta, E; Innes, N; Schuller, A A; Vermaire, J H; Marshman, Z.

In: Community Dental Health, Vol. 34, No. 3, 12.09.2017, p. 131-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gupta, E, Innes, N, Schuller, AA, Vermaire, JH & Marshman, Z 2017, 'A scoping review of the uses of the care index in children', Community Dental Health, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_4063Gupta06
Gupta, E ; Innes, N ; Schuller, A A ; Vermaire, J H ; Marshman, Z. / A scoping review of the uses of the care index in children. In: Community Dental Health. 2017 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 131-136.
@article{f93ea5ddf4bb452691e5ecb22bf1a7a2,
title = "A scoping review of the uses of the care index in children",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To conduct a scoping review of literature to describe how the care index (CI) and restorative index (RI) are used in child populations and to determine whether they are fit for purpose.BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Scoping review conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework.METHOD: Electronic and manual literature searches (1980-2015) were conducted. Titles and abstracts were screened, full-texts of potential studies were reviewed two reviewers extracted data independently, followed by data charting and summarising.RESULTS: Out of 104 articles meeting all criteria, most were cross-sectional (92{\%}), and 56{\%} were conducted in UK and Brazil. Most commonly (63{\%}) studies used CI and RI to obtain epidemiological data on dental care levels. Of the studies that defined CI and RI, most used and specified the standard definition. The CI and RI scores varied either due to patient related factors such as age, gender or dental care related factors including, cost of treatment and method of provider remuneration.CONCLUSION: Overall, it is recommended that future studies should clearly state the definitions and thresholds used to obtain CI and RI, which would enable comparison between communities and allow temporal trends to be studied. Additionally, deriving separate CI and RI scores for groups based on caries extent would help to highlight inequalities in the provision of care. Further research is needed to explore the applicability of CI and RI to changing approaches to caries management with current care recommendations emphasising on minimal treatment and secondary prevention.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "E Gupta and N Innes and Schuller, {A A} and Vermaire, {J H} and Z Marshman",
note = "Copyright{\circledC} 2017 Dennis Barber Ltd.",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1922/CDH_4063Gupta06",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "131--136",
journal = "Community Dental Health",
issn = "0265-539X",
publisher = "FDI World Dental Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A scoping review of the uses of the care index in children

AU - Gupta, E

AU - Innes, N

AU - Schuller, A A

AU - Vermaire, J H

AU - Marshman, Z

N1 - Copyright© 2017 Dennis Barber Ltd.

PY - 2017/9/12

Y1 - 2017/9/12

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To conduct a scoping review of literature to describe how the care index (CI) and restorative index (RI) are used in child populations and to determine whether they are fit for purpose.BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Scoping review conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework.METHOD: Electronic and manual literature searches (1980-2015) were conducted. Titles and abstracts were screened, full-texts of potential studies were reviewed two reviewers extracted data independently, followed by data charting and summarising.RESULTS: Out of 104 articles meeting all criteria, most were cross-sectional (92%), and 56% were conducted in UK and Brazil. Most commonly (63%) studies used CI and RI to obtain epidemiological data on dental care levels. Of the studies that defined CI and RI, most used and specified the standard definition. The CI and RI scores varied either due to patient related factors such as age, gender or dental care related factors including, cost of treatment and method of provider remuneration.CONCLUSION: Overall, it is recommended that future studies should clearly state the definitions and thresholds used to obtain CI and RI, which would enable comparison between communities and allow temporal trends to be studied. Additionally, deriving separate CI and RI scores for groups based on caries extent would help to highlight inequalities in the provision of care. Further research is needed to explore the applicability of CI and RI to changing approaches to caries management with current care recommendations emphasising on minimal treatment and secondary prevention.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To conduct a scoping review of literature to describe how the care index (CI) and restorative index (RI) are used in child populations and to determine whether they are fit for purpose.BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Scoping review conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework.METHOD: Electronic and manual literature searches (1980-2015) were conducted. Titles and abstracts were screened, full-texts of potential studies were reviewed two reviewers extracted data independently, followed by data charting and summarising.RESULTS: Out of 104 articles meeting all criteria, most were cross-sectional (92%), and 56% were conducted in UK and Brazil. Most commonly (63%) studies used CI and RI to obtain epidemiological data on dental care levels. Of the studies that defined CI and RI, most used and specified the standard definition. The CI and RI scores varied either due to patient related factors such as age, gender or dental care related factors including, cost of treatment and method of provider remuneration.CONCLUSION: Overall, it is recommended that future studies should clearly state the definitions and thresholds used to obtain CI and RI, which would enable comparison between communities and allow temporal trends to be studied. Additionally, deriving separate CI and RI scores for groups based on caries extent would help to highlight inequalities in the provision of care. Further research is needed to explore the applicability of CI and RI to changing approaches to caries management with current care recommendations emphasising on minimal treatment and secondary prevention.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1922/CDH_4063Gupta06

DO - 10.1922/CDH_4063Gupta06

M3 - Article

C2 - 28872806

VL - 34

SP - 131

EP - 136

JO - Community Dental Health

JF - Community Dental Health

SN - 0265-539X

IS - 3

ER -