A simple visual analogue scale to assess the quality of life in women with urinary incontinence

Mohamed Abdel-Fattah, I. Ramsay, J. W. Barrington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim
The objective of this study is to determine whether a simple visual analogue scale; “incontinence bothersome scale (IBS)” can reliably assess the quality of life in women with urinary incontinence.

Design
A prospective cohort study in a UK district general hospital.

Methods
Two hundreds women with urinary incontinence participated in the study over 1-year period. They completed Kings health questionnaire version 7 (KHQ) and the incontinence bothersome scale (IBS). The results of the IBS were then compared to the total KHQ score and to each domain separately, using the Pearson correlation test. Women in the study were then classified into two main groups according to their urodynamics diagnosis (urodynamic stress incontinence group/detrusor overactivity group) and the total KHQ scores were compared with the IBS scores in each group.

Results
The IBS scores had poor correlation with the total KHQ scores (r = 0.656) and the difference between both arms was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). Further analysis of KHQ domains showed that except for the impact of incontinence domain (r = 0.728) all other domains correlated poorly to the IBS. This poor correlation pertained in sub-analysis of women with DO and USI (r = 0.65 and 0.48, respectively).

Conclusion
This study has shown that a simple visual scale is not a reliable tool in assessing the QoL in women with urinary incontinence. A formal, validated and reliable QoL questionnaire is still the method of choice for QoL assessment, even if it takes longer to complete.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-89
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume133
Issue number1
Early online date21 Jun 2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Urinary Incontinence
Visual Analog Scale
Quality of Life
Health
Urodynamics
District Hospitals
General Hospitals
Surveys and Questionnaires
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • urinary incontinence
  • quality of life
  • kings health questionnaire
  • visual analogue scale

Cite this

A simple visual analogue scale to assess the quality of life in women with urinary incontinence. / Abdel-Fattah, Mohamed; Ramsay, I.; Barrington, J. W.

In: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 133, No. 1, 07.2007, p. 86-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{898d8d529fb44cd6812aace88eed9623,
title = "A simple visual analogue scale to assess the quality of life in women with urinary incontinence",
abstract = "Aim The objective of this study is to determine whether a simple visual analogue scale; “incontinence bothersome scale (IBS)” can reliably assess the quality of life in women with urinary incontinence. Design A prospective cohort study in a UK district general hospital. Methods Two hundreds women with urinary incontinence participated in the study over 1-year period. They completed Kings health questionnaire version 7 (KHQ) and the incontinence bothersome scale (IBS). The results of the IBS were then compared to the total KHQ score and to each domain separately, using the Pearson correlation test. Women in the study were then classified into two main groups according to their urodynamics diagnosis (urodynamic stress incontinence group/detrusor overactivity group) and the total KHQ scores were compared with the IBS scores in each group. Results The IBS scores had poor correlation with the total KHQ scores (r = 0.656) and the difference between both arms was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). Further analysis of KHQ domains showed that except for the impact of incontinence domain (r = 0.728) all other domains correlated poorly to the IBS. This poor correlation pertained in sub-analysis of women with DO and USI (r = 0.65 and 0.48, respectively). Conclusion This study has shown that a simple visual scale is not a reliable tool in assessing the QoL in women with urinary incontinence. A formal, validated and reliable QoL questionnaire is still the method of choice for QoL assessment, even if it takes longer to complete.",
keywords = "urinary incontinence, quality of life, kings health questionnaire, visual analogue scale",
author = "Mohamed Abdel-Fattah and I. Ramsay and Barrington, {J. W.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.034",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "86--89",
journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",
issn = "0301-2115",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simple visual analogue scale to assess the quality of life in women with urinary incontinence

AU - Abdel-Fattah, Mohamed

AU - Ramsay, I.

AU - Barrington, J. W.

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Aim The objective of this study is to determine whether a simple visual analogue scale; “incontinence bothersome scale (IBS)” can reliably assess the quality of life in women with urinary incontinence. Design A prospective cohort study in a UK district general hospital. Methods Two hundreds women with urinary incontinence participated in the study over 1-year period. They completed Kings health questionnaire version 7 (KHQ) and the incontinence bothersome scale (IBS). The results of the IBS were then compared to the total KHQ score and to each domain separately, using the Pearson correlation test. Women in the study were then classified into two main groups according to their urodynamics diagnosis (urodynamic stress incontinence group/detrusor overactivity group) and the total KHQ scores were compared with the IBS scores in each group. Results The IBS scores had poor correlation with the total KHQ scores (r = 0.656) and the difference between both arms was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). Further analysis of KHQ domains showed that except for the impact of incontinence domain (r = 0.728) all other domains correlated poorly to the IBS. This poor correlation pertained in sub-analysis of women with DO and USI (r = 0.65 and 0.48, respectively). Conclusion This study has shown that a simple visual scale is not a reliable tool in assessing the QoL in women with urinary incontinence. A formal, validated and reliable QoL questionnaire is still the method of choice for QoL assessment, even if it takes longer to complete.

AB - Aim The objective of this study is to determine whether a simple visual analogue scale; “incontinence bothersome scale (IBS)” can reliably assess the quality of life in women with urinary incontinence. Design A prospective cohort study in a UK district general hospital. Methods Two hundreds women with urinary incontinence participated in the study over 1-year period. They completed Kings health questionnaire version 7 (KHQ) and the incontinence bothersome scale (IBS). The results of the IBS were then compared to the total KHQ score and to each domain separately, using the Pearson correlation test. Women in the study were then classified into two main groups according to their urodynamics diagnosis (urodynamic stress incontinence group/detrusor overactivity group) and the total KHQ scores were compared with the IBS scores in each group. Results The IBS scores had poor correlation with the total KHQ scores (r = 0.656) and the difference between both arms was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). Further analysis of KHQ domains showed that except for the impact of incontinence domain (r = 0.728) all other domains correlated poorly to the IBS. This poor correlation pertained in sub-analysis of women with DO and USI (r = 0.65 and 0.48, respectively). Conclusion This study has shown that a simple visual scale is not a reliable tool in assessing the QoL in women with urinary incontinence. A formal, validated and reliable QoL questionnaire is still the method of choice for QoL assessment, even if it takes longer to complete.

KW - urinary incontinence

KW - quality of life

KW - kings health questionnaire

KW - visual analogue scale

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.034

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.034

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 86

EP - 89

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0301-2115

IS - 1

ER -