Abstract
Recent museum practice has seen a return to ‘wonder’ as a governing principle for display and visitor engagement. Wonder has long been a contentious topic in aesthetics, literary studies, and philosophy of religion, but its adoption in the museum world has been predominantly uncritical. Here I will suggest that museums draw on a concept of wonder that is largely unchanged from seventeenth-century philosophy, yet without taking account of early modern doubts about wonder's efficacy for knowledge. In this paper I look at Descartes' and Spinoza's views about wonder and the uses and disadvantages of wonder as a learning tool. This examination is extended to consider Descartes' and Spinoza's likely views about ‘museums’, in the sense of spaces that link objects both to feeling and to knowing. Finally, I suggest that there are resources in Spinoza's philosophy for bringing knowledge-enhancing feelings into the museum without resorting to the problematic concept of wonder.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 95-116 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements |
Volume | 79 |
Early online date | 14 Oct 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 26 Oct 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘A Sudden Surprise of the Soul’: Wonder in Museums and Early Modern Philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Beth Lord
- School of Divinity, History & Philosophy, Philosophy - Personal Chair
- Special Collections Centre - Honorary Curator
Person: Academic, Honorary