‘A Sudden Surprise of the Soul’

Wonder in Museums and Early Modern Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent museum practice has seen a return to ‘wonder’ as a governing principle for display and visitor engagement. Wonder has long been a contentious topic in aesthetics, literary studies, and philosophy of religion, but its adoption in the museum world has been predominantly uncritical. Here I will suggest that museums draw on a concept of wonder that is largely unchanged from seventeenth-century philosophy, yet without taking account of early modern doubts about wonder's efficacy for knowledge. In this paper I look at Descartes' and Spinoza's views about wonder and the uses and disadvantages of wonder as a learning tool. This examination is extended to consider Descartes' and Spinoza's likely views about ‘museums’, in the sense of spaces that link objects both to feeling and to knowing. Finally, I suggest that there are resources in Spinoza's philosophy for bringing knowledge-enhancing feelings into the museum without resorting to the problematic concept of wonder.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-116
Number of pages22
JournalRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplements
Volume79
Early online date14 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Surprise
Early Modern philosophy
Baruch Spinoza
Philosophy
Literary Studies
Aesthetics
Efficacy
Resources
Philosophy of Religion

Cite this

‘A Sudden Surprise of the Soul’ : Wonder in Museums and Early Modern Philosophy. / Lord, Beth.

In: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, Vol. 79, 26.10.2016, p. 95-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3afff6273a5b495d92e6953a9e443cd2,
title = "‘A Sudden Surprise of the Soul’: Wonder in Museums and Early Modern Philosophy",
abstract = "Recent museum practice has seen a return to ‘wonder’ as a governing principle for display and visitor engagement. Wonder has long been a contentious topic in aesthetics, literary studies, and philosophy of religion, but its adoption in the museum world has been predominantly uncritical. Here I will suggest that museums draw on a concept of wonder that is largely unchanged from seventeenth-century philosophy, yet without taking account of early modern doubts about wonder's efficacy for knowledge. In this paper I look at Descartes' and Spinoza's views about wonder and the uses and disadvantages of wonder as a learning tool. This examination is extended to consider Descartes' and Spinoza's likely views about ‘museums’, in the sense of spaces that link objects both to feeling and to knowing. Finally, I suggest that there are resources in Spinoza's philosophy for bringing knowledge-enhancing feelings into the museum without resorting to the problematic concept of wonder.",
author = "Beth Lord",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1017/S1358246116000096",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "95--116",
journal = "Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘A Sudden Surprise of the Soul’

T2 - Wonder in Museums and Early Modern Philosophy

AU - Lord, Beth

PY - 2016/10/26

Y1 - 2016/10/26

N2 - Recent museum practice has seen a return to ‘wonder’ as a governing principle for display and visitor engagement. Wonder has long been a contentious topic in aesthetics, literary studies, and philosophy of religion, but its adoption in the museum world has been predominantly uncritical. Here I will suggest that museums draw on a concept of wonder that is largely unchanged from seventeenth-century philosophy, yet without taking account of early modern doubts about wonder's efficacy for knowledge. In this paper I look at Descartes' and Spinoza's views about wonder and the uses and disadvantages of wonder as a learning tool. This examination is extended to consider Descartes' and Spinoza's likely views about ‘museums’, in the sense of spaces that link objects both to feeling and to knowing. Finally, I suggest that there are resources in Spinoza's philosophy for bringing knowledge-enhancing feelings into the museum without resorting to the problematic concept of wonder.

AB - Recent museum practice has seen a return to ‘wonder’ as a governing principle for display and visitor engagement. Wonder has long been a contentious topic in aesthetics, literary studies, and philosophy of religion, but its adoption in the museum world has been predominantly uncritical. Here I will suggest that museums draw on a concept of wonder that is largely unchanged from seventeenth-century philosophy, yet without taking account of early modern doubts about wonder's efficacy for knowledge. In this paper I look at Descartes' and Spinoza's views about wonder and the uses and disadvantages of wonder as a learning tool. This examination is extended to consider Descartes' and Spinoza's likely views about ‘museums’, in the sense of spaces that link objects both to feeling and to knowing. Finally, I suggest that there are resources in Spinoza's philosophy for bringing knowledge-enhancing feelings into the museum without resorting to the problematic concept of wonder.

U2 - 10.1017/S1358246116000096

DO - 10.1017/S1358246116000096

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 95

EP - 116

JO - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements

JF - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements

ER -