A systematic literature review of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency in humans

Paul A. Cauchi, Ghee Soon Ang, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Jennifer M. Burr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative benefits and to identify any adverse effects of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).

DESIGN: Systematic literature review.

METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases from January 1, 1989 through September 30, 2006: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science citation index, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify any additional reports. The quality of published reports was assessed using standard methods. The main outcome measure was improvement in vision of at least two Snellen lines of best,corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data on adverse outcomes also were collected.

RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no randomized controlled studies. All 26 studies were either prospective or retrospective case series. For bilateral severe LSCD, keratolimbal allograft was the most common intervention with systemic immunosuppression. Other interventions included eccentric penetrating keratolimbal allografts and cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial grafts. An improvement in BCVA of two lines or more was reported in 31% to 67% of eyes. For unilateral severe LSCD, the most common surgical intervention was contralateral conjunctival limbal autograft, with 35% to 88% of eyes gaining an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more. The only study evaluating partial LSCD showed an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more in 39% of eyes.

CONCLUSIONS: Studies to date have not provided strong evidence to guide clinical practice on which surgery is most beneficial to treat various types of LSCD. Standardized data collection in a multicenter LSCD register is suggested.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-259
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume146
Issue number2
Early online date16 May 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Keywords

  • ocular-surface disorders
  • amniotic membrane transplantation
  • penetrating keratoplasty
  • keratolimbal allograft
  • corneal surface
  • autograft transplantation
  • chronic phases
  • reconstruction
  • burns
  • conjunctival

Cite this

A systematic literature review of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency in humans. / Cauchi, Paul A.; Ang, Ghee Soon; Azuara-Blanco, Augusto; Burr, Jennifer M.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 146, No. 2, 08.2008, p. 251-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cauchi, Paul A. ; Ang, Ghee Soon ; Azuara-Blanco, Augusto ; Burr, Jennifer M. / A systematic literature review of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency in humans. In: American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008 ; Vol. 146, No. 2. pp. 251-259.
@article{95d489042ce24f41ad89bd81bcba9e26,
title = "A systematic literature review of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency in humans",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative benefits and to identify any adverse effects of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).DESIGN: Systematic literature review.METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases from January 1, 1989 through September 30, 2006: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science citation index, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify any additional reports. The quality of published reports was assessed using standard methods. The main outcome measure was improvement in vision of at least two Snellen lines of best,corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data on adverse outcomes also were collected.RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no randomized controlled studies. All 26 studies were either prospective or retrospective case series. For bilateral severe LSCD, keratolimbal allograft was the most common intervention with systemic immunosuppression. Other interventions included eccentric penetrating keratolimbal allografts and cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial grafts. An improvement in BCVA of two lines or more was reported in 31{\%} to 67{\%} of eyes. For unilateral severe LSCD, the most common surgical intervention was contralateral conjunctival limbal autograft, with 35{\%} to 88{\%} of eyes gaining an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more. The only study evaluating partial LSCD showed an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more in 39{\%} of eyes.CONCLUSIONS: Studies to date have not provided strong evidence to guide clinical practice on which surgery is most beneficial to treat various types of LSCD. Standardized data collection in a multicenter LSCD register is suggested.",
keywords = "ocular-surface disorders, amniotic membrane transplantation, penetrating keratoplasty, keratolimbal allograft, corneal surface, autograft transplantation, chronic phases, reconstruction, burns, conjunctival",
author = "Cauchi, {Paul A.} and Ang, {Ghee Soon} and Augusto Azuara-Blanco and Burr, {Jennifer M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2008.03.018",
language = "English",
volume = "146",
pages = "251--259",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic literature review of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency in humans

AU - Cauchi, Paul A.

AU - Ang, Ghee Soon

AU - Azuara-Blanco, Augusto

AU - Burr, Jennifer M.

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative benefits and to identify any adverse effects of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).DESIGN: Systematic literature review.METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases from January 1, 1989 through September 30, 2006: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science citation index, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify any additional reports. The quality of published reports was assessed using standard methods. The main outcome measure was improvement in vision of at least two Snellen lines of best,corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data on adverse outcomes also were collected.RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no randomized controlled studies. All 26 studies were either prospective or retrospective case series. For bilateral severe LSCD, keratolimbal allograft was the most common intervention with systemic immunosuppression. Other interventions included eccentric penetrating keratolimbal allografts and cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial grafts. An improvement in BCVA of two lines or more was reported in 31% to 67% of eyes. For unilateral severe LSCD, the most common surgical intervention was contralateral conjunctival limbal autograft, with 35% to 88% of eyes gaining an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more. The only study evaluating partial LSCD showed an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more in 39% of eyes.CONCLUSIONS: Studies to date have not provided strong evidence to guide clinical practice on which surgery is most beneficial to treat various types of LSCD. Standardized data collection in a multicenter LSCD register is suggested.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative benefits and to identify any adverse effects of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).DESIGN: Systematic literature review.METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases from January 1, 1989 through September 30, 2006: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science citation index, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify any additional reports. The quality of published reports was assessed using standard methods. The main outcome measure was improvement in vision of at least two Snellen lines of best,corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data on adverse outcomes also were collected.RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no randomized controlled studies. All 26 studies were either prospective or retrospective case series. For bilateral severe LSCD, keratolimbal allograft was the most common intervention with systemic immunosuppression. Other interventions included eccentric penetrating keratolimbal allografts and cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial grafts. An improvement in BCVA of two lines or more was reported in 31% to 67% of eyes. For unilateral severe LSCD, the most common surgical intervention was contralateral conjunctival limbal autograft, with 35% to 88% of eyes gaining an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more. The only study evaluating partial LSCD showed an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more in 39% of eyes.CONCLUSIONS: Studies to date have not provided strong evidence to guide clinical practice on which surgery is most beneficial to treat various types of LSCD. Standardized data collection in a multicenter LSCD register is suggested.

KW - ocular-surface disorders

KW - amniotic membrane transplantation

KW - penetrating keratoplasty

KW - keratolimbal allograft

KW - corneal surface

KW - autograft transplantation

KW - chronic phases

KW - reconstruction

KW - burns

KW - conjunctival

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.03.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.03.018

M3 - Article

VL - 146

SP - 251

EP - 259

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 2

ER -