A Systematic Review Examining Socioeconomic Factors in Trials of Interventions for Men that Report Weight as an Outcome

Matthew D. Mcdonald; Kate Hunt; Hamsini  Sivaramakrishnan; Joanna  Moullin; Alison Avenell; Deborah A.  Kerr; Jack M.  Birch; Nikos  Ntoumanis; Eleanor  Quested

doi:10.1111/obr.13436

A Systematic Review Examining Socioeconomic Factors in Trials of Interventions for Men that Report Weight as an Outcome

Matthew D. Mcdonald, Kate Hunt, Hamsini Sivaramakrishnan, Joanna Moullin, Alison Avenell, Deborah A. Kerr, Jack M. Birch, Nikos Ntoumanis, Eleanor Quested^* (Corresponding Author)

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Weight management interventions designed specifically for men have become more common, but the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered in trials of these interventions is unclear. We synthesised study characteristics, methods and reporting of interventions with a behavioural component for men that report weight as an outcome, to establish the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered during intervention design, conduct and reporting. A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL for studies published from January 2000 to July 2021. Thirty-six trials were included. Educational attainment (n=24) was the most frequently reported socioeconomic characteristic, followed by working status (n=14) and area level deprivation (n=12). Seven studies did not report any socioeconomic characteristics. Most studies (n=20) did not mention the socioeconomic profile of their samples in relation to study strengths or limitations. Few (n=4) consulted with men from lower socioeconomic groups during intervention design. One study examined potential differential intervention effects across socioeconomic groups, with most not powered to do so. Recent feasibility trials (n=3) targeting specific socioeconomic groups suggests a potential nascent towards a greater consideration of factors related to equity. To best inform public health policy related to health inequalities, greater consideration of socioeconomic factors is required in trials of men’s weight management interventions

Original language	English
Article number	e13436
Number of pages	15
Journal	Obesity Reviews
Volume	23
Issue number	7
Early online date	21 Feb 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13436
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2022

Keywords

Weight Management
Inequalities
Socioeconomic Characteristics
RCT

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/obr.13436Licence: CC BY-NC

McDonald_etal_OR_A_Systematic_Review_VoR
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. © 2022 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Final published version, 1.27 MBLicence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{fdf403012809480fa66e8298a6cddd5b,

title = "A Systematic Review Examining Socioeconomic Factors in Trials of Interventions for Men that Report Weight as an Outcome",

abstract = "Weight management interventions designed specifically for men have become more common, but the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered in trials of these interventions is unclear. We synthesised study characteristics, methods and reporting of interventions with a behavioural component for men that report weight as an outcome, to establish the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered during intervention design, conduct and reporting. A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL for studies published from January 2000 to July 2021. Thirty-six trials were included. Educational attainment (n=24) was the most frequently reported socioeconomic characteristic, followed by working status (n=14) and area level deprivation (n=12). Seven studies did not report any socioeconomic characteristics. Most studies (n=20) did not mention the socioeconomic profile of their samples in relation to study strengths or limitations. Few (n=4) consulted with men from lower socioeconomic groups during intervention design. One study examined potential differential intervention effects across socioeconomic groups, with most not powered to do so. Recent feasibility trials (n=3) targeting specific socioeconomic groups suggests a potential nascent towards a greater consideration of factors related to equity. To best inform public health policy related to health inequalities, greater consideration of socioeconomic factors is required in trials of men{\textquoteright}s weight management interventions",

keywords = "Weight Management, Inequalities, Socioeconomic Characteristics, RCT",

author = "Mcdonald, {Matthew D.} and Kate Hunt and Hamsini Sivaramakrishnan and Joanna Moullin and Alison Avenell and Kerr, {Deborah A.} and Birch, {Jack M.} and Nikos Ntoumanis and Eleanor Quested",

note = "Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge the Wadjuk Nyungar people as the traditional owners of the land on which Curtin University{\textquoteright}s Bentley campus sits and we would like to pay respects to elders{\textquoteright} past, present and future. The authors would like to thank the Curtin University librarians Diana Blackwood and Claire Murphy for their advice on developing the search strategy. The authors also thank Zibu Moyo for his assistance with data extraction checking. Funding Information: Matthew D McDonald is doing a PhD at Curtin University supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program cholarship. Alison Avenell is employed at the Health Services Research Unit, which is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates. Jack M Birch is supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) (Grant MC_UU_00006/6).",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/obr.13436",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

journal = "Obesity Reviews",

issn = "1467-7881",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell ",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review Examining Socioeconomic Factors in Trials of Interventions for Men that Report Weight as an Outcome

AU - Mcdonald, Matthew D.

AU - Hunt, Kate

AU - Sivaramakrishnan, Hamsini

AU - Moullin, Joanna

AU - Avenell, Alison

AU - Kerr, Deborah A.

AU - Birch, Jack M.

AU - Ntoumanis, Nikos

AU - Quested, Eleanor

N1 - Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge the Wadjuk Nyungar people as the traditional owners of the land on which Curtin University’s Bentley campus sits and we would like to pay respects to elders’ past, present and future. The authors would like to thank the Curtin University librarians Diana Blackwood and Claire Murphy for their advice on developing the search strategy. The authors also thank Zibu Moyo for his assistance with data extraction checking. Funding Information: Matthew D McDonald is doing a PhD at Curtin University supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program cholarship. Alison Avenell is employed at the Health Services Research Unit, which is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates. Jack M Birch is supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) (Grant MC_UU_00006/6).

PY - 2022/7/1

Y1 - 2022/7/1

N2 - Weight management interventions designed specifically for men have become more common, but the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered in trials of these interventions is unclear. We synthesised study characteristics, methods and reporting of interventions with a behavioural component for men that report weight as an outcome, to establish the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered during intervention design, conduct and reporting. A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL for studies published from January 2000 to July 2021. Thirty-six trials were included. Educational attainment (n=24) was the most frequently reported socioeconomic characteristic, followed by working status (n=14) and area level deprivation (n=12). Seven studies did not report any socioeconomic characteristics. Most studies (n=20) did not mention the socioeconomic profile of their samples in relation to study strengths or limitations. Few (n=4) consulted with men from lower socioeconomic groups during intervention design. One study examined potential differential intervention effects across socioeconomic groups, with most not powered to do so. Recent feasibility trials (n=3) targeting specific socioeconomic groups suggests a potential nascent towards a greater consideration of factors related to equity. To best inform public health policy related to health inequalities, greater consideration of socioeconomic factors is required in trials of men’s weight management interventions

AB - Weight management interventions designed specifically for men have become more common, but the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered in trials of these interventions is unclear. We synthesised study characteristics, methods and reporting of interventions with a behavioural component for men that report weight as an outcome, to establish the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered during intervention design, conduct and reporting. A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL for studies published from January 2000 to July 2021. Thirty-six trials were included. Educational attainment (n=24) was the most frequently reported socioeconomic characteristic, followed by working status (n=14) and area level deprivation (n=12). Seven studies did not report any socioeconomic characteristics. Most studies (n=20) did not mention the socioeconomic profile of their samples in relation to study strengths or limitations. Few (n=4) consulted with men from lower socioeconomic groups during intervention design. One study examined potential differential intervention effects across socioeconomic groups, with most not powered to do so. Recent feasibility trials (n=3) targeting specific socioeconomic groups suggests a potential nascent towards a greater consideration of factors related to equity. To best inform public health policy related to health inequalities, greater consideration of socioeconomic factors is required in trials of men’s weight management interventions

KW - Weight Management

KW - Inequalities

KW - Socioeconomic Characteristics

KW - RCT

U2 - 10.1111/obr.13436

DO - 10.1111/obr.13436

M3 - Article

VL - 23

JO - Obesity Reviews

JF - Obesity Reviews

SN - 1467-7881

IS - 7

M1 - e13436

ER -

A Systematic Review Examining Socioeconomic Factors in Trials of Interventions for Men that Report Weight as an Outcome

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this