A systematic review of evidence for the effectiveness of practitioner-based complementary and alternative therapies in the management of rheumatic diseases: Rheumatoid arthritis

Gary J. Macfarlane*, Priya Paudyal, Michael Doherty, Edzard Ernst, George Lewith, Hugh Macpherson, Julius Sim, Gareth T. Jones

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To critically review the evidence on the effectiveness of complementary therapies for patients with RA.Methods. Randomized controlled trials, published in English up to May 2011, were identified using systematic searches of bibliographic databases and searching of reference lists. Information was extracted on outcomes and statistical significance in comparison with alternative treatments and reported side effects. The methodological quality of the identified studies was determined using the Jadad scoring system. All outcomes were considered but with a focus on patient global assessment and pain reporting.Results. Eleven eligible trials were identified covering seven therapies. Three trials that compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture reported no significant difference in pain reduction between the groups but one out of two reported an improvement in patient global assessment. Except for reduction in physician's global assessment of treatment and disease activity reported in one trial, no other comparative benefit of acupuncture was seen. There were two studies on meditation and one each on autogenic training, healing therapy, progressive muscle relaxation, static magnets and tai chi. None of these trials reported positive comparative effects on pain but some positive effects on patient global assessment were noted at individual time points in the healing therapy and magnet therapy studies. A small number of other outcomes showed comparative improvement in individual trials. There were no reports of major adverse events.Conclusion. The very limited evidence available indicates that for none of the practitioner-based complementary therapies considered here is there good evidence of efficacy or effectiveness in the management of RA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1707-1713
Number of pages7
JournalRheumatology
Volume51
Issue number9
Early online date1 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Rheumatic Diseases
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Acupuncture
Autogenic Training
Magnets
Therapeutics
Tai Ji
Bibliographic Databases
Meditation
Pain
Pain Measurement
Randomized Controlled Trials
Physicians

Keywords

  • Acupuncture
  • Autogenic training
  • Complementary medicine
  • Healing therapy
  • Meditation
  • Progressive muscle relaxation
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Static magnets
  • Tai chi

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

A systematic review of evidence for the effectiveness of practitioner-based complementary and alternative therapies in the management of rheumatic diseases : Rheumatoid arthritis. / Macfarlane, Gary J.; Paudyal, Priya; Doherty, Michael; Ernst, Edzard; Lewith, George; Macpherson, Hugh; Sim, Julius; Jones, Gareth T.

In: Rheumatology, Vol. 51, No. 9, 01.09.2012, p. 1707-1713.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2956d21c1da04a999f24ed45e182618c,
title = "A systematic review of evidence for the effectiveness of practitioner-based complementary and alternative therapies in the management of rheumatic diseases: Rheumatoid arthritis",
abstract = "Objective. To critically review the evidence on the effectiveness of complementary therapies for patients with RA.Methods. Randomized controlled trials, published in English up to May 2011, were identified using systematic searches of bibliographic databases and searching of reference lists. Information was extracted on outcomes and statistical significance in comparison with alternative treatments and reported side effects. The methodological quality of the identified studies was determined using the Jadad scoring system. All outcomes were considered but with a focus on patient global assessment and pain reporting.Results. Eleven eligible trials were identified covering seven therapies. Three trials that compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture reported no significant difference in pain reduction between the groups but one out of two reported an improvement in patient global assessment. Except for reduction in physician's global assessment of treatment and disease activity reported in one trial, no other comparative benefit of acupuncture was seen. There were two studies on meditation and one each on autogenic training, healing therapy, progressive muscle relaxation, static magnets and tai chi. None of these trials reported positive comparative effects on pain but some positive effects on patient global assessment were noted at individual time points in the healing therapy and magnet therapy studies. A small number of other outcomes showed comparative improvement in individual trials. There were no reports of major adverse events.Conclusion. The very limited evidence available indicates that for none of the practitioner-based complementary therapies considered here is there good evidence of efficacy or effectiveness in the management of RA.",
keywords = "Acupuncture, Autogenic training, Complementary medicine, Healing therapy, Meditation, Progressive muscle relaxation, Randomized controlled trials, Rheumatoid arthritis, Static magnets, Tai chi",
author = "Macfarlane, {Gary J.} and Priya Paudyal and Michael Doherty and Edzard Ernst and George Lewith and Hugh Macpherson and Julius Sim and Jones, {Gareth T.}",
note = "Funding: This work was supported by Arthritis Research UK.",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/rheumatology/kes133",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1707--1713",
journal = "Rheumatology",
issn = "1462-0324",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of evidence for the effectiveness of practitioner-based complementary and alternative therapies in the management of rheumatic diseases

T2 - Rheumatoid arthritis

AU - Macfarlane, Gary J.

AU - Paudyal, Priya

AU - Doherty, Michael

AU - Ernst, Edzard

AU - Lewith, George

AU - Macpherson, Hugh

AU - Sim, Julius

AU - Jones, Gareth T.

N1 - Funding: This work was supported by Arthritis Research UK.

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Objective. To critically review the evidence on the effectiveness of complementary therapies for patients with RA.Methods. Randomized controlled trials, published in English up to May 2011, were identified using systematic searches of bibliographic databases and searching of reference lists. Information was extracted on outcomes and statistical significance in comparison with alternative treatments and reported side effects. The methodological quality of the identified studies was determined using the Jadad scoring system. All outcomes were considered but with a focus on patient global assessment and pain reporting.Results. Eleven eligible trials were identified covering seven therapies. Three trials that compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture reported no significant difference in pain reduction between the groups but one out of two reported an improvement in patient global assessment. Except for reduction in physician's global assessment of treatment and disease activity reported in one trial, no other comparative benefit of acupuncture was seen. There were two studies on meditation and one each on autogenic training, healing therapy, progressive muscle relaxation, static magnets and tai chi. None of these trials reported positive comparative effects on pain but some positive effects on patient global assessment were noted at individual time points in the healing therapy and magnet therapy studies. A small number of other outcomes showed comparative improvement in individual trials. There were no reports of major adverse events.Conclusion. The very limited evidence available indicates that for none of the practitioner-based complementary therapies considered here is there good evidence of efficacy or effectiveness in the management of RA.

AB - Objective. To critically review the evidence on the effectiveness of complementary therapies for patients with RA.Methods. Randomized controlled trials, published in English up to May 2011, were identified using systematic searches of bibliographic databases and searching of reference lists. Information was extracted on outcomes and statistical significance in comparison with alternative treatments and reported side effects. The methodological quality of the identified studies was determined using the Jadad scoring system. All outcomes were considered but with a focus on patient global assessment and pain reporting.Results. Eleven eligible trials were identified covering seven therapies. Three trials that compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture reported no significant difference in pain reduction between the groups but one out of two reported an improvement in patient global assessment. Except for reduction in physician's global assessment of treatment and disease activity reported in one trial, no other comparative benefit of acupuncture was seen. There were two studies on meditation and one each on autogenic training, healing therapy, progressive muscle relaxation, static magnets and tai chi. None of these trials reported positive comparative effects on pain but some positive effects on patient global assessment were noted at individual time points in the healing therapy and magnet therapy studies. A small number of other outcomes showed comparative improvement in individual trials. There were no reports of major adverse events.Conclusion. The very limited evidence available indicates that for none of the practitioner-based complementary therapies considered here is there good evidence of efficacy or effectiveness in the management of RA.

KW - Acupuncture

KW - Autogenic training

KW - Complementary medicine

KW - Healing therapy

KW - Meditation

KW - Progressive muscle relaxation

KW - Randomized controlled trials

KW - Rheumatoid arthritis

KW - Static magnets

KW - Tai chi

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865316529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rheumatology/kes133

DO - 10.1093/rheumatology/kes133

M3 - Article

C2 - 22661556

AN - SCOPUS:84865316529

VL - 51

SP - 1707

EP - 1713

JO - Rheumatology

JF - Rheumatology

SN - 1462-0324

IS - 9

ER -