A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies

a behavioural approach

Anita Huis, Theo van Achterberg, Marijn de Bruin, Richard Grol, Lisette Schoonhoven, Marlies Hulscher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
Many strategies have been designed and evaluated to address the problem of low hand hygiene (HH) compliance. Which of these strategies are most effective and how they work is still unclear. Here we describe frequently used improvement strategies and related determinants of behaviour change that prompt good HH behaviour to provide a better overview of the choice and content of such strategies.

Methods
Systematic searches of experimental and quasi-experimental research on HH improvement strategies were conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to November 2009. First, we extracted the study characteristics using the EPOC Data Collection Checklist, including study objectives, setting, study design, target population, outcome measures, description of the intervention, analysis, and results. Second, we used the Taxonomy of Behavioural Change Techniques to identify targeted determinants.

Results
We reviewed 41 studies. The most frequently addressed determinants were knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation of behaviour. Fewer studies addressed social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, and intention. Thirteen studies used a controlled design to measure the effects of HH improvement strategies on HH behaviour. The effectiveness of the strategies varied substantially, but most controlled studies showed positive results. The median effect size of these strategies increased from 17.6 (relative difference) addressing one determinant to 49.5 for the studies that addressed five determinants.

Conclusions
By focussing on determinants of behaviour change, we found hidden and valuable components in HH improvement strategies. Addressing only determinants such as knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation is not enough to change HH behaviour. Addressing combinations of different determinants showed better results. This indicates that we should be more creative in the application of alternative improvement activities addressing determinants such as social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, or intention.
Original languageEnglish
Article number92
Number of pages14
JournalImplementation Science
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Hand Hygiene
Self Efficacy
Behavior Control
Health Services Needs and Demand
Checklist
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Research

Keywords

  • attitude of health personnel
  • behavior
  • cross infection
  • hand disinfection
  • health knowledge, attitudes, practice
  • humans
  • infection control
  • personnel, hospital
  • self efficacy
  • social environment

Cite this

A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies : a behavioural approach. / Huis, Anita; van Achterberg, Theo; de Bruin, Marijn; Grol, Richard; Schoonhoven, Lisette; Hulscher, Marlies.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 7, 92, 14.09.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huis, Anita ; van Achterberg, Theo ; de Bruin, Marijn ; Grol, Richard ; Schoonhoven, Lisette ; Hulscher, Marlies. / A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies : a behavioural approach. In: Implementation Science. 2012 ; Vol. 7.
@article{cd8eed2a84d740e5abb89a9a44d0f9a0,
title = "A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies: a behavioural approach",
abstract = "BackgroundMany strategies have been designed and evaluated to address the problem of low hand hygiene (HH) compliance. Which of these strategies are most effective and how they work is still unclear. Here we describe frequently used improvement strategies and related determinants of behaviour change that prompt good HH behaviour to provide a better overview of the choice and content of such strategies.MethodsSystematic searches of experimental and quasi-experimental research on HH improvement strategies were conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to November 2009. First, we extracted the study characteristics using the EPOC Data Collection Checklist, including study objectives, setting, study design, target population, outcome measures, description of the intervention, analysis, and results. Second, we used the Taxonomy of Behavioural Change Techniques to identify targeted determinants.ResultsWe reviewed 41 studies. The most frequently addressed determinants were knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation of behaviour. Fewer studies addressed social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, and intention. Thirteen studies used a controlled design to measure the effects of HH improvement strategies on HH behaviour. The effectiveness of the strategies varied substantially, but most controlled studies showed positive results. The median effect size of these strategies increased from 17.6 (relative difference) addressing one determinant to 49.5 for the studies that addressed five determinants.ConclusionsBy focussing on determinants of behaviour change, we found hidden and valuable components in HH improvement strategies. Addressing only determinants such as knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation is not enough to change HH behaviour. Addressing combinations of different determinants showed better results. This indicates that we should be more creative in the application of alternative improvement activities addressing determinants such as social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, or intention.",
keywords = "attitude of health personnel, behavior, cross infection, hand disinfection, health knowledge, attitudes, practice, humans, infection control, personnel, hospital, self efficacy, social environment",
author = "Anita Huis and {van Achterberg}, Theo and {de Bruin}, Marijn and Richard Grol and Lisette Schoonhoven and Marlies Hulscher",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1186/1748-5908-7-92",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies

T2 - a behavioural approach

AU - Huis, Anita

AU - van Achterberg, Theo

AU - de Bruin, Marijn

AU - Grol, Richard

AU - Schoonhoven, Lisette

AU - Hulscher, Marlies

PY - 2012/9/14

Y1 - 2012/9/14

N2 - BackgroundMany strategies have been designed and evaluated to address the problem of low hand hygiene (HH) compliance. Which of these strategies are most effective and how they work is still unclear. Here we describe frequently used improvement strategies and related determinants of behaviour change that prompt good HH behaviour to provide a better overview of the choice and content of such strategies.MethodsSystematic searches of experimental and quasi-experimental research on HH improvement strategies were conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to November 2009. First, we extracted the study characteristics using the EPOC Data Collection Checklist, including study objectives, setting, study design, target population, outcome measures, description of the intervention, analysis, and results. Second, we used the Taxonomy of Behavioural Change Techniques to identify targeted determinants.ResultsWe reviewed 41 studies. The most frequently addressed determinants were knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation of behaviour. Fewer studies addressed social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, and intention. Thirteen studies used a controlled design to measure the effects of HH improvement strategies on HH behaviour. The effectiveness of the strategies varied substantially, but most controlled studies showed positive results. The median effect size of these strategies increased from 17.6 (relative difference) addressing one determinant to 49.5 for the studies that addressed five determinants.ConclusionsBy focussing on determinants of behaviour change, we found hidden and valuable components in HH improvement strategies. Addressing only determinants such as knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation is not enough to change HH behaviour. Addressing combinations of different determinants showed better results. This indicates that we should be more creative in the application of alternative improvement activities addressing determinants such as social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, or intention.

AB - BackgroundMany strategies have been designed and evaluated to address the problem of low hand hygiene (HH) compliance. Which of these strategies are most effective and how they work is still unclear. Here we describe frequently used improvement strategies and related determinants of behaviour change that prompt good HH behaviour to provide a better overview of the choice and content of such strategies.MethodsSystematic searches of experimental and quasi-experimental research on HH improvement strategies were conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to November 2009. First, we extracted the study characteristics using the EPOC Data Collection Checklist, including study objectives, setting, study design, target population, outcome measures, description of the intervention, analysis, and results. Second, we used the Taxonomy of Behavioural Change Techniques to identify targeted determinants.ResultsWe reviewed 41 studies. The most frequently addressed determinants were knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation of behaviour. Fewer studies addressed social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, and intention. Thirteen studies used a controlled design to measure the effects of HH improvement strategies on HH behaviour. The effectiveness of the strategies varied substantially, but most controlled studies showed positive results. The median effect size of these strategies increased from 17.6 (relative difference) addressing one determinant to 49.5 for the studies that addressed five determinants.ConclusionsBy focussing on determinants of behaviour change, we found hidden and valuable components in HH improvement strategies. Addressing only determinants such as knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation is not enough to change HH behaviour. Addressing combinations of different determinants showed better results. This indicates that we should be more creative in the application of alternative improvement activities addressing determinants such as social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, or intention.

KW - attitude of health personnel

KW - behavior

KW - cross infection

KW - hand disinfection

KW - health knowledge, attitudes, practice

KW - humans

KW - infection control

KW - personnel, hospital

KW - self efficacy

KW - social environment

U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-7-92

DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-7-92

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

M1 - 92

ER -