A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Group versus Individual Treatments for Adult Obesity

V A Paul-Ebhohimhen, Alison Avenell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Both group and individual modes of delivery are employed for obesity treatments. Commercial weight loss groups commonly employ group-based delivery, while many clinical based settings employ one-to-one delivery. We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of treatments for adult obesity to compare the effectiveness of group-based to individual-based modes of treatment delivery. Methods: We searched 7 electronic databases and 2 journals and reviewed secondary references, based on a priori criteria to systematically review: randomised controlled trials of obesity treatments, participants with BMI >= 28 kg/m(2), age >= 18 years, comparison groups including at least 1 group-based and 1 individual-based treatment group, and follow-up >= 1 year. We extracted data and conducted meta-analysis of weight change. Results: Eleven comparison groups from 5 qualifying trials were obtained, representing a total participant pool of 336. Significantly greater (p = 0.03) weight change at 12 months was found in group-based over individual-based treatment, and sub-analyses showed that increased effectiveness was associated with the use of financial reward and psychologist-led interventions. Conclusion: Group-based interventions were more effective than individual-based interventions among a predominantly female participant pool receiving psychologist-led interventions. Future studies to explore differences by professional group and interventions among men, which are accompanied by economic evaluation, are recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-24
Number of pages8
JournalObesity Facts
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

Keywords

  • obesity
  • group versus individual
  • randomised controlled trials
  • weigh-loss
  • follow-up
  • technical skills
  • randomized-trial
  • behavior-therapy
  • participants
  • maintenance
  • health
  • size

Cite this

A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Group versus Individual Treatments for Adult Obesity. / Paul-Ebhohimhen, V A; Avenell, Alison.

In: Obesity Facts, Vol. 2, No. 1, 02.2009, p. 17-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7fb0ce21a20242a1891d70d6680fac0b,
title = "A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Group versus Individual Treatments for Adult Obesity",
abstract = "Background: Both group and individual modes of delivery are employed for obesity treatments. Commercial weight loss groups commonly employ group-based delivery, while many clinical based settings employ one-to-one delivery. We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of treatments for adult obesity to compare the effectiveness of group-based to individual-based modes of treatment delivery. Methods: We searched 7 electronic databases and 2 journals and reviewed secondary references, based on a priori criteria to systematically review: randomised controlled trials of obesity treatments, participants with BMI >= 28 kg/m(2), age >= 18 years, comparison groups including at least 1 group-based and 1 individual-based treatment group, and follow-up >= 1 year. We extracted data and conducted meta-analysis of weight change. Results: Eleven comparison groups from 5 qualifying trials were obtained, representing a total participant pool of 336. Significantly greater (p = 0.03) weight change at 12 months was found in group-based over individual-based treatment, and sub-analyses showed that increased effectiveness was associated with the use of financial reward and psychologist-led interventions. Conclusion: Group-based interventions were more effective than individual-based interventions among a predominantly female participant pool receiving psychologist-led interventions. Future studies to explore differences by professional group and interventions among men, which are accompanied by economic evaluation, are recommended.",
keywords = "obesity, group versus individual, randomised controlled trials, weigh-loss, follow-up, technical skills, randomized-trial, behavior-therapy, participants, maintenance, health, size",
author = "Paul-Ebhohimhen, {V A} and Alison Avenell",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1159/000186144",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "17--24",
journal = "Obesity Facts",
issn = "1662-4025",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Group versus Individual Treatments for Adult Obesity

AU - Paul-Ebhohimhen, V A

AU - Avenell, Alison

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Background: Both group and individual modes of delivery are employed for obesity treatments. Commercial weight loss groups commonly employ group-based delivery, while many clinical based settings employ one-to-one delivery. We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of treatments for adult obesity to compare the effectiveness of group-based to individual-based modes of treatment delivery. Methods: We searched 7 electronic databases and 2 journals and reviewed secondary references, based on a priori criteria to systematically review: randomised controlled trials of obesity treatments, participants with BMI >= 28 kg/m(2), age >= 18 years, comparison groups including at least 1 group-based and 1 individual-based treatment group, and follow-up >= 1 year. We extracted data and conducted meta-analysis of weight change. Results: Eleven comparison groups from 5 qualifying trials were obtained, representing a total participant pool of 336. Significantly greater (p = 0.03) weight change at 12 months was found in group-based over individual-based treatment, and sub-analyses showed that increased effectiveness was associated with the use of financial reward and psychologist-led interventions. Conclusion: Group-based interventions were more effective than individual-based interventions among a predominantly female participant pool receiving psychologist-led interventions. Future studies to explore differences by professional group and interventions among men, which are accompanied by economic evaluation, are recommended.

AB - Background: Both group and individual modes of delivery are employed for obesity treatments. Commercial weight loss groups commonly employ group-based delivery, while many clinical based settings employ one-to-one delivery. We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of treatments for adult obesity to compare the effectiveness of group-based to individual-based modes of treatment delivery. Methods: We searched 7 electronic databases and 2 journals and reviewed secondary references, based on a priori criteria to systematically review: randomised controlled trials of obesity treatments, participants with BMI >= 28 kg/m(2), age >= 18 years, comparison groups including at least 1 group-based and 1 individual-based treatment group, and follow-up >= 1 year. We extracted data and conducted meta-analysis of weight change. Results: Eleven comparison groups from 5 qualifying trials were obtained, representing a total participant pool of 336. Significantly greater (p = 0.03) weight change at 12 months was found in group-based over individual-based treatment, and sub-analyses showed that increased effectiveness was associated with the use of financial reward and psychologist-led interventions. Conclusion: Group-based interventions were more effective than individual-based interventions among a predominantly female participant pool receiving psychologist-led interventions. Future studies to explore differences by professional group and interventions among men, which are accompanied by economic evaluation, are recommended.

KW - obesity

KW - group versus individual

KW - randomised controlled trials

KW - weigh-loss

KW - follow-up

KW - technical skills

KW - randomized-trial

KW - behavior-therapy

KW - participants

KW - maintenance

KW - health

KW - size

U2 - 10.1159/000186144

DO - 10.1159/000186144

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 17

EP - 24

JO - Obesity Facts

JF - Obesity Facts

SN - 1662-4025

IS - 1

ER -