A Systems Theory Perspective on Polanyi’s Great Transformation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Whereas much of the renewed interest in Polanyi’s Great Transformation speculates that the rebalancing of economy and society he foresaw might now be emerging in the context of the financial crisis, the systems theory perspective adopted in this article concludes that there are good reasons to believe that such a shift may be no closer. From an examination of credit default swaps and corporate bonds, the article suggests that finance may best be understood as an internally differentiated subsystem of the economy and thus perhaps peculiarly proof against efforts to exert control over it. Concluding that Polanyi’s analysis lacks the conceptual tools to cope with contemporary conditions when compared to systems theory, the article nevertheless suggests that his approach may usefully be extended by adding a fourth fictitious commodity – risk – to the familiar trio of land, labor, and money.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-72
Number of pages24
JournalStudies in Law, Politics and Society
Volume62
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

system theory
economy
subsystem
financial crisis
commodity
credit
finance
money
labor
examination
lack
Society

Cite this

A Systems Theory Perspective on Polanyi’s Great Transformation. / Paterson, John.

In: Studies in Law, Politics and Society, Vol. 62, 2013, p. 49-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e80368e0d64d4896bbd2743ee07c2706,
title = "A Systems Theory Perspective on Polanyi’s Great Transformation",
abstract = "Whereas much of the renewed interest in Polanyi’s Great Transformation speculates that the rebalancing of economy and society he foresaw might now be emerging in the context of the financial crisis, the systems theory perspective adopted in this article concludes that there are good reasons to believe that such a shift may be no closer. From an examination of credit default swaps and corporate bonds, the article suggests that finance may best be understood as an internally differentiated subsystem of the economy and thus perhaps peculiarly proof against efforts to exert control over it. Concluding that Polanyi’s analysis lacks the conceptual tools to cope with contemporary conditions when compared to systems theory, the article nevertheless suggests that his approach may usefully be extended by adding a fourth fictitious commodity – risk – to the familiar trio of land, labor, and money.",
author = "John Paterson",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/S1059-4337(2013)0000062003",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "49--72",
journal = "Studies in Law, Politics and Society",
issn = "1059-4337",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systems Theory Perspective on Polanyi’s Great Transformation

AU - Paterson, John

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Whereas much of the renewed interest in Polanyi’s Great Transformation speculates that the rebalancing of economy and society he foresaw might now be emerging in the context of the financial crisis, the systems theory perspective adopted in this article concludes that there are good reasons to believe that such a shift may be no closer. From an examination of credit default swaps and corporate bonds, the article suggests that finance may best be understood as an internally differentiated subsystem of the economy and thus perhaps peculiarly proof against efforts to exert control over it. Concluding that Polanyi’s analysis lacks the conceptual tools to cope with contemporary conditions when compared to systems theory, the article nevertheless suggests that his approach may usefully be extended by adding a fourth fictitious commodity – risk – to the familiar trio of land, labor, and money.

AB - Whereas much of the renewed interest in Polanyi’s Great Transformation speculates that the rebalancing of economy and society he foresaw might now be emerging in the context of the financial crisis, the systems theory perspective adopted in this article concludes that there are good reasons to believe that such a shift may be no closer. From an examination of credit default swaps and corporate bonds, the article suggests that finance may best be understood as an internally differentiated subsystem of the economy and thus perhaps peculiarly proof against efforts to exert control over it. Concluding that Polanyi’s analysis lacks the conceptual tools to cope with contemporary conditions when compared to systems theory, the article nevertheless suggests that his approach may usefully be extended by adding a fourth fictitious commodity – risk – to the familiar trio of land, labor, and money.

U2 - 10.1108/S1059-4337(2013)0000062003

DO - 10.1108/S1059-4337(2013)0000062003

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 49

EP - 72

JO - Studies in Law, Politics and Society

JF - Studies in Law, Politics and Society

SN - 1059-4337

ER -