TY - JOUR
T1 - A Tale of Unintended Consequence
T2 - corporate membership in early UK company law
AU - Mackie, Colin
N1 - Acknowledgements
Many thanks, with the usual disclaimer as to errors and omissions, to the editorial board and anonymous referee for their comments on earlier drafts of this article. An earlier draft of this article was presented at a seminar held at the Centre for Corporate and Commercial Law (3CL) at the University of Cambridge on 27 October 2015.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - This article seeks to elucidate the historical basis in UK company law of the right for one company to be a member (i.e. shareholder) of another company and, through this position, benefit from limited liability. The contemporary relevance of this study lies in better understanding the original rationale behind conferring limited liability upon corporate members. Their own members may have already benefited from it. The protection afforded by this doctrine can, of course, be used strategically by a parent company to minimise losses arising from its subsidiary’s activities. It is argued that the courts found corporate membership to be compatible with the Companies Act 1862 in the late 1860s to ensure that the companies in question bore legal responsibility for shares which they held or were held on their behalf. This prevented them from disclaiming liabilities associated with the shares by contending that their very ownership was, in fact, unlawful. Importantly, the courts neither acknowledged nor considered whether corporate members could or, indeed, should benefit from limited liability. Whilst companies’ legislation, when read alongside this formative jurisprudence, would later be taken to confer limited liability upon corporate members, this was an unintended consequence of the early case-law and the 1862 Act itself.
AB - This article seeks to elucidate the historical basis in UK company law of the right for one company to be a member (i.e. shareholder) of another company and, through this position, benefit from limited liability. The contemporary relevance of this study lies in better understanding the original rationale behind conferring limited liability upon corporate members. Their own members may have already benefited from it. The protection afforded by this doctrine can, of course, be used strategically by a parent company to minimise losses arising from its subsidiary’s activities. It is argued that the courts found corporate membership to be compatible with the Companies Act 1862 in the late 1860s to ensure that the companies in question bore legal responsibility for shares which they held or were held on their behalf. This prevented them from disclaiming liabilities associated with the shares by contending that their very ownership was, in fact, unlawful. Importantly, the courts neither acknowledged nor considered whether corporate members could or, indeed, should benefit from limited liability. Whilst companies’ legislation, when read alongside this formative jurisprudence, would later be taken to confer limited liability upon corporate members, this was an unintended consequence of the early case-law and the 1862 Act itself.
KW - limited liability
KW - ultra vires
KW - corporate member
KW - corporate groups
KW - corporate structure
KW - separate legal personality
U2 - 10.1080/14735970.2016.1209803
DO - 10.1080/14735970.2016.1209803
M3 - Article
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 37
JO - Journal of Corporate Law Studies
JF - Journal of Corporate Law Studies
SN - 1473-5970
IS - 1
ER -