A Threatening Face in the Crowd

Effects of Emotional Singletons on Visual Working Memory

Paul M. J. Thomas, Margaret C Jackson, Jane E. Raymond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Faces with threatening versus positive expressions are better remembered in visual working memory (WM) and are especially effective at capturing attention. We asked how the presence of a single threatening or happy face affects WM for concurrently viewed faces with neutral expressions. If threat captures attention and attention determines WM, then a WM performance cost for neutral faces should be evident. However, if threat boosts processing in an object-specific, non-competitive manner, then no such costs should be produced. Participants viewed three neutral and one angry or happy face for two seconds. Face recognition was tested one second later. Although WM was better for singletons than non-singletons and better for angry versus happy singletons, WM for neutral faces remained unaffected by either singleton. These results combined with eye movement and response time analyses argue against a selective attention account of threat-based benefits to WM and support object-specific enhancement via threat processing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-263
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Costs and Cost Analysis
Eye Movements
Visual Working Memory
Emotion
Working Memory
Crowds
Reaction Time
Threat

Cite this

A Threatening Face in the Crowd : Effects of Emotional Singletons on Visual Working Memory. / Thomas, Paul M. J.; Jackson, Margaret C; Raymond, Jane E.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 40, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 253-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c6a98184292f44f0b735e02c805aa74e,
title = "A Threatening Face in the Crowd: Effects of Emotional Singletons on Visual Working Memory",
abstract = "Faces with threatening versus positive expressions are better remembered in visual working memory (WM) and are especially effective at capturing attention. We asked how the presence of a single threatening or happy face affects WM for concurrently viewed faces with neutral expressions. If threat captures attention and attention determines WM, then a WM performance cost for neutral faces should be evident. However, if threat boosts processing in an object-specific, non-competitive manner, then no such costs should be produced. Participants viewed three neutral and one angry or happy face for two seconds. Face recognition was tested one second later. Although WM was better for singletons than non-singletons and better for angry versus happy singletons, WM for neutral faces remained unaffected by either singleton. These results combined with eye movement and response time analyses argue against a selective attention account of threat-based benefits to WM and support object-specific enhancement via threat processing.",
author = "Thomas, {Paul M. J.} and Jackson, {Margaret C} and Raymond, {Jane E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1037/a0033970",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "253--263",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Threatening Face in the Crowd

T2 - Effects of Emotional Singletons on Visual Working Memory

AU - Thomas, Paul M. J.

AU - Jackson, Margaret C

AU - Raymond, Jane E.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Faces with threatening versus positive expressions are better remembered in visual working memory (WM) and are especially effective at capturing attention. We asked how the presence of a single threatening or happy face affects WM for concurrently viewed faces with neutral expressions. If threat captures attention and attention determines WM, then a WM performance cost for neutral faces should be evident. However, if threat boosts processing in an object-specific, non-competitive manner, then no such costs should be produced. Participants viewed three neutral and one angry or happy face for two seconds. Face recognition was tested one second later. Although WM was better for singletons than non-singletons and better for angry versus happy singletons, WM for neutral faces remained unaffected by either singleton. These results combined with eye movement and response time analyses argue against a selective attention account of threat-based benefits to WM and support object-specific enhancement via threat processing.

AB - Faces with threatening versus positive expressions are better remembered in visual working memory (WM) and are especially effective at capturing attention. We asked how the presence of a single threatening or happy face affects WM for concurrently viewed faces with neutral expressions. If threat captures attention and attention determines WM, then a WM performance cost for neutral faces should be evident. However, if threat boosts processing in an object-specific, non-competitive manner, then no such costs should be produced. Participants viewed three neutral and one angry or happy face for two seconds. Face recognition was tested one second later. Although WM was better for singletons than non-singletons and better for angry versus happy singletons, WM for neutral faces remained unaffected by either singleton. These results combined with eye movement and response time analyses argue against a selective attention account of threat-based benefits to WM and support object-specific enhancement via threat processing.

U2 - 10.1037/a0033970

DO - 10.1037/a0033970

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 253

EP - 263

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 1

ER -