A two-centred pragmatic randomised controlled trial of two interventions of postnatal support

M. Reid, C. M. A. Glazener, G. D. Murray, G. S. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To establish whether providing additional postnatal support during the early postnatal months influences women's physical and psychological health and to identify health service benefits.

Design Pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design with two interventions.

Setting Community centres, Ayrshire and Grampian, Scotland.

Population One thousand and four primiparous women, 83% completed the baseline questionnaire, 71% at six months.

Methods (1) An invitation to a local postnatal support group run weekly with a facilitator, starting two weeks postpartum. (2) A postnatal support manual, posted two weeks postpartum.

Main outcome measures Data regarding primary outcome postnatal depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS), secondary outcomes, general health measures (SF-36), social support (SSQ6), use of health services and women's views of interventions were collected at two weeks postpartum and at three and six months.

Results There were no significant differences in EPDS scores between the control and trial arms at three and six months, nor were there differences in the SF-36 and the SSQ6 scores. The 95% CI for the difference in EPDS effectively excluded a change in mean score of more than 10% with either intervention. There were no differences in health service attendances in primary or secondary care between the control and trial arms. Of those women who attended the groups, 40% attended six or more. Women reported favourably on the 'pack' with the. majority reading it a few times and feeling that it was aimed at them.

Conclusions Wide-scale provision by the National Health Service of either support groups or self-help manuals is not appropriate if the aim is to improve measurable health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1164-1170
Number of pages7
JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume109
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2002

Keywords

  • social support
  • health
  • depression
  • prevention

Cite this

A two-centred pragmatic randomised controlled trial of two interventions of postnatal support. / Reid, M.; Glazener, C. M. A.; Murray, G. D.; Taylor, G. S.

In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 109, No. 10, 10.2002, p. 1164-1170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c3460d0fd6fe41b3812624db0570d6c0,
title = "A two-centred pragmatic randomised controlled trial of two interventions of postnatal support",
abstract = "Objectives To establish whether providing additional postnatal support during the early postnatal months influences women's physical and psychological health and to identify health service benefits.Design Pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design with two interventions.Setting Community centres, Ayrshire and Grampian, Scotland.Population One thousand and four primiparous women, 83{\%} completed the baseline questionnaire, 71{\%} at six months.Methods (1) An invitation to a local postnatal support group run weekly with a facilitator, starting two weeks postpartum. (2) A postnatal support manual, posted two weeks postpartum.Main outcome measures Data regarding primary outcome postnatal depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS), secondary outcomes, general health measures (SF-36), social support (SSQ6), use of health services and women's views of interventions were collected at two weeks postpartum and at three and six months.Results There were no significant differences in EPDS scores between the control and trial arms at three and six months, nor were there differences in the SF-36 and the SSQ6 scores. The 95{\%} CI for the difference in EPDS effectively excluded a change in mean score of more than 10{\%} with either intervention. There were no differences in health service attendances in primary or secondary care between the control and trial arms. Of those women who attended the groups, 40{\%} attended six or more. Women reported favourably on the 'pack' with the. majority reading it a few times and feeling that it was aimed at them.Conclusions Wide-scale provision by the National Health Service of either support groups or self-help manuals is not appropriate if the aim is to improve measurable health outcomes.",
keywords = "social support, health, depression, prevention",
author = "M. Reid and Glazener, {C. M. A.} and Murray, {G. D.} and Taylor, {G. S.}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01306.x",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "1164--1170",
journal = "BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A two-centred pragmatic randomised controlled trial of two interventions of postnatal support

AU - Reid, M.

AU - Glazener, C. M. A.

AU - Murray, G. D.

AU - Taylor, G. S.

PY - 2002/10

Y1 - 2002/10

N2 - Objectives To establish whether providing additional postnatal support during the early postnatal months influences women's physical and psychological health and to identify health service benefits.Design Pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design with two interventions.Setting Community centres, Ayrshire and Grampian, Scotland.Population One thousand and four primiparous women, 83% completed the baseline questionnaire, 71% at six months.Methods (1) An invitation to a local postnatal support group run weekly with a facilitator, starting two weeks postpartum. (2) A postnatal support manual, posted two weeks postpartum.Main outcome measures Data regarding primary outcome postnatal depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS), secondary outcomes, general health measures (SF-36), social support (SSQ6), use of health services and women's views of interventions were collected at two weeks postpartum and at three and six months.Results There were no significant differences in EPDS scores between the control and trial arms at three and six months, nor were there differences in the SF-36 and the SSQ6 scores. The 95% CI for the difference in EPDS effectively excluded a change in mean score of more than 10% with either intervention. There were no differences in health service attendances in primary or secondary care between the control and trial arms. Of those women who attended the groups, 40% attended six or more. Women reported favourably on the 'pack' with the. majority reading it a few times and feeling that it was aimed at them.Conclusions Wide-scale provision by the National Health Service of either support groups or self-help manuals is not appropriate if the aim is to improve measurable health outcomes.

AB - Objectives To establish whether providing additional postnatal support during the early postnatal months influences women's physical and psychological health and to identify health service benefits.Design Pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design with two interventions.Setting Community centres, Ayrshire and Grampian, Scotland.Population One thousand and four primiparous women, 83% completed the baseline questionnaire, 71% at six months.Methods (1) An invitation to a local postnatal support group run weekly with a facilitator, starting two weeks postpartum. (2) A postnatal support manual, posted two weeks postpartum.Main outcome measures Data regarding primary outcome postnatal depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS), secondary outcomes, general health measures (SF-36), social support (SSQ6), use of health services and women's views of interventions were collected at two weeks postpartum and at three and six months.Results There were no significant differences in EPDS scores between the control and trial arms at three and six months, nor were there differences in the SF-36 and the SSQ6 scores. The 95% CI for the difference in EPDS effectively excluded a change in mean score of more than 10% with either intervention. There were no differences in health service attendances in primary or secondary care between the control and trial arms. Of those women who attended the groups, 40% attended six or more. Women reported favourably on the 'pack' with the. majority reading it a few times and feeling that it was aimed at them.Conclusions Wide-scale provision by the National Health Service of either support groups or self-help manuals is not appropriate if the aim is to improve measurable health outcomes.

KW - social support

KW - health

KW - depression

KW - prevention

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01306.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01306.x

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 1164

EP - 1170

JO - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 10

ER -