Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace as a treatment for Colles' fracture. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial

Nezar Tumia, D. Wardlaw, J. Hallett, R. Deutman, S. A. Mattsson, B. Sanden

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We carried out a randomised, prospective, multicentre clinical trial of the treatment of Colles' fractures. A total of 339 patients was placed into two groups, those with minimally displaced fractures not requiring manipulation (151 patients) and those with displaced fractures which needed manipulation (188 patients). Treatment was by either a conventional Colles' plaster cast (a control group) or with a prefabricated functional brace (the Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace).

    Similar results were obtained in both groups with regard to the reduction and to pain scores but the brace provided better grip strength in the early stages of treatment. This was statistically significant after five weeks for both manipulated and non-manipulated fractures. At the tenth day the results were statistically significant only in manipulated fractures. There was no significant difference in the functional outcome between the two treatment groups. However, younger patients and those with less initial displacement had better functional results.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)78-82
    Number of pages4
    JournalJournal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume
    Volume85
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • PLASTER

    Cite this

    Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace as a treatment for Colles' fracture. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial. / Tumia, Nezar; Wardlaw, D.; Hallett, J.; Deutman, R.; Mattsson, S. A.; Sanden, B.

    In: Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol. 85, No. 1, 2003, p. 78-82.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Tumia, Nezar ; Wardlaw, D. ; Hallett, J. ; Deutman, R. ; Mattsson, S. A. ; Sanden, B. / Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace as a treatment for Colles' fracture. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial. In: Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume. 2003 ; Vol. 85, No. 1. pp. 78-82.
    @article{02cafd89e1ef4b97af4327b1e5f67219,
    title = "Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace as a treatment for Colles' fracture. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial",
    abstract = "We carried out a randomised, prospective, multicentre clinical trial of the treatment of Colles' fractures. A total of 339 patients was placed into two groups, those with minimally displaced fractures not requiring manipulation (151 patients) and those with displaced fractures which needed manipulation (188 patients). Treatment was by either a conventional Colles' plaster cast (a control group) or with a prefabricated functional brace (the Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace).Similar results were obtained in both groups with regard to the reduction and to pain scores but the brace provided better grip strength in the early stages of treatment. This was statistically significant after five weeks for both manipulated and non-manipulated fractures. At the tenth day the results were statistically significant only in manipulated fractures. There was no significant difference in the functional outcome between the two treatment groups. However, younger patients and those with less initial displacement had better functional results.",
    keywords = "PLASTER",
    author = "Nezar Tumia and D. Wardlaw and J. Hallett and R. Deutman and Mattsson, {S. A.} and B. Sanden",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1302/0301-620X.85B1.12468",
    language = "English",
    volume = "85",
    pages = "78--82",
    journal = "Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume",
    issn = "0301-620X",
    publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace as a treatment for Colles' fracture. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial

    AU - Tumia, Nezar

    AU - Wardlaw, D.

    AU - Hallett, J.

    AU - Deutman, R.

    AU - Mattsson, S. A.

    AU - Sanden, B.

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - We carried out a randomised, prospective, multicentre clinical trial of the treatment of Colles' fractures. A total of 339 patients was placed into two groups, those with minimally displaced fractures not requiring manipulation (151 patients) and those with displaced fractures which needed manipulation (188 patients). Treatment was by either a conventional Colles' plaster cast (a control group) or with a prefabricated functional brace (the Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace).Similar results were obtained in both groups with regard to the reduction and to pain scores but the brace provided better grip strength in the early stages of treatment. This was statistically significant after five weeks for both manipulated and non-manipulated fractures. At the tenth day the results were statistically significant only in manipulated fractures. There was no significant difference in the functional outcome between the two treatment groups. However, younger patients and those with less initial displacement had better functional results.

    AB - We carried out a randomised, prospective, multicentre clinical trial of the treatment of Colles' fractures. A total of 339 patients was placed into two groups, those with minimally displaced fractures not requiring manipulation (151 patients) and those with displaced fractures which needed manipulation (188 patients). Treatment was by either a conventional Colles' plaster cast (a control group) or with a prefabricated functional brace (the Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace).Similar results were obtained in both groups with regard to the reduction and to pain scores but the brace provided better grip strength in the early stages of treatment. This was statistically significant after five weeks for both manipulated and non-manipulated fractures. At the tenth day the results were statistically significant only in manipulated fractures. There was no significant difference in the functional outcome between the two treatment groups. However, younger patients and those with less initial displacement had better functional results.

    KW - PLASTER

    U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.85B1.12468

    DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.85B1.12468

    M3 - Article

    VL - 85

    SP - 78

    EP - 82

    JO - Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume

    JF - Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume

    SN - 0301-620X

    IS - 1

    ER -