Absence of chlamydial deoxyribonucleic acid from testicular and epididymal samples from men with obstructive azoospermia

Sreebala Sripada, Maria Rosario Amezaga, Mark Hamilton, Hamish McKenzie, Allan Templeton, Siladitya Bhattacharya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective
To identify Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by polymerase chain reaction in the upper genital tract of men with obstructive azoospermia compared with men seeking vasectomy reversal.

Design
Case–control study.

Setting
Tertiary referral center, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Patient(s)
Cases were men with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia, and controls were men with azoospermia secondary to vasectomy.

Intervention(s)
Chlamydia trachomatis–specific DNA test by polymerase chain reaction on testicular and epididymal biopsy samples, as well as epididymal aspirate.

Main Outcome Measure(s)
Presence of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA.

Result(s)
We did not detect the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis–specific DNA by polymerase chain reaction in the epididymis or testis of 36 asymptomatic men with obstructive azoospermia (14 cases, 22 controls).

Conclusion(s)
Our hypothesis that unrecognized, asymptomatic chlamydial infection will lead to complete bilateral obstruction of the male genital tract remains unproven.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)833-836
Number of pages4
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume93
Issue number3
Early online date25 Dec 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

Keywords

  • adult
  • azoospermia
  • biopsy
  • case-control studies
  • chlamydia infections
  • chlamydia trachomatis
  • DNA, bacterial
  • epididymis
  • humans
  • infertility, male
  • male
  • middle aged
  • polymerase chain reaction
  • testis
  • vasectomy
  • chlamydia
  • male infertility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Absence of chlamydial deoxyribonucleic acid from testicular and epididymal samples from men with obstructive azoospermia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this