Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles

Cory E. Goldstein, Charles Weijer, Jamie C. Brehaut, Marion Campbell, Dean A. Fergusson, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Karla Hemming, Austin R. Horn, Monica Taljaard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Quality and service improvement (QSI) research employs a broad range of methods to enhance the efficiency of health care delivery. QSI research differs from traditional health care research and poses unique ethical questions. Since QSI research aims to generate knowledge to enhance quality improvement efforts, should it be considered research for regulatory purposes? Is review by a research ethics committee required? Should health care providers be considered research participants? If participation in QSI research entails no more than minimal risk, is consent required? The lack of consensus on answers to these questions highlights the need for ethical guidance.

Main Body: Three distinct approaches to classifying QSI research in accordance with existing ethical principles and regulations can be found in the literature. In the first approach, QSI research is viewed as distinct from other types of health care research and does not require regulation. In the second approach, QSI research falls within regulatory guidelines but is exempt from research ethics committee review. In the third approach, QSI research is deemed to be part of the learning health care system and, as such, is subject to a different set of ethical principles entirely. In this paper we critically assess each of these views.

Conclusion: While none of these approaches is entirely satisfactory, we argue that use of the ethical principles governing research provides the best means of addressing the numerous questions posed by QSI research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number334
JournalTrials
Volume19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Research
Health Services Research
Research Ethics Committees
Delivery of Health Care
Health Personnel
Consensus
Learning
Guidelines
Efficiency

Keywords

  • quality and service improvement research
  • ethics
  • informed consent
  • regulation
  • research ethics committees

Cite this

Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J. C., Campbell, M., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., ... Taljaard, M. (2018). Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles. Trials, 19, [334]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2

Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles. / Goldstein, Cory E.; Weijer, Charles; Brehaut, Jamie C.; Campbell, Marion; Fergusson, Dean A.; Grimshaw, Jeremy M.; Hemming, Karla; Horn, Austin R.; Taljaard, Monica.

In: Trials, Vol. 19, 334, 25.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldstein, CE, Weijer, C, Brehaut, JC, Campbell, M, Fergusson, DA, Grimshaw, JM, Hemming, K, Horn, AR & Taljaard, M 2018, 'Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles', Trials, vol. 19, 334. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2
Goldstein, Cory E. ; Weijer, Charles ; Brehaut, Jamie C. ; Campbell, Marion ; Fergusson, Dean A. ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ; Hemming, Karla ; Horn, Austin R. ; Taljaard, Monica. / Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles. In: Trials. 2018 ; Vol. 19.
@article{4f4ef492115e438890bab21d8299f50c,
title = "Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles",
abstract = "Background: Quality and service improvement (QSI) research employs a broad range of methods to enhance the efficiency of health care delivery. QSI research differs from traditional health care research and poses unique ethical questions. Since QSI research aims to generate knowledge to enhance quality improvement efforts, should it be considered research for regulatory purposes? Is review by a research ethics committee required? Should health care providers be considered research participants? If participation in QSI research entails no more than minimal risk, is consent required? The lack of consensus on answers to these questions highlights the need for ethical guidance.Main Body: Three distinct approaches to classifying QSI research in accordance with existing ethical principles and regulations can be found in the literature. In the first approach, QSI research is viewed as distinct from other types of health care research and does not require regulation. In the second approach, QSI research falls within regulatory guidelines but is exempt from research ethics committee review. In the third approach, QSI research is deemed to be part of the learning health care system and, as such, is subject to a different set of ethical principles entirely. In this paper we critically assess each of these views.Conclusion: While none of these approaches is entirely satisfactory, we argue that use of the ethical principles governing research provides the best means of addressing the numerous questions posed by QSI research.",
keywords = "quality and service improvement research, ethics, informed consent, regulation, research ethics committees",
author = "Goldstein, {Cory E.} and Charles Weijer and Brehaut, {Jamie C.} and Marion Campbell and Fergusson, {Dean A.} and Grimshaw, {Jeremy M.} and Karla Hemming and Horn, {Austin R.} and Monica Taljaard",
note = "Funds were provided by a Canadian Institute of Health Research grant (Nominated PI: Monica Taljaard, PJT – 153045). Funds were also generously provided by Charles Weijer, who is funded by a Tier 1 Canadian Research Chair.",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles

AU - Goldstein, Cory E.

AU - Weijer, Charles

AU - Brehaut, Jamie C.

AU - Campbell, Marion

AU - Fergusson, Dean A.

AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy M.

AU - Hemming, Karla

AU - Horn, Austin R.

AU - Taljaard, Monica

N1 - Funds were provided by a Canadian Institute of Health Research grant (Nominated PI: Monica Taljaard, PJT – 153045). Funds were also generously provided by Charles Weijer, who is funded by a Tier 1 Canadian Research Chair.

PY - 2018/6/25

Y1 - 2018/6/25

N2 - Background: Quality and service improvement (QSI) research employs a broad range of methods to enhance the efficiency of health care delivery. QSI research differs from traditional health care research and poses unique ethical questions. Since QSI research aims to generate knowledge to enhance quality improvement efforts, should it be considered research for regulatory purposes? Is review by a research ethics committee required? Should health care providers be considered research participants? If participation in QSI research entails no more than minimal risk, is consent required? The lack of consensus on answers to these questions highlights the need for ethical guidance.Main Body: Three distinct approaches to classifying QSI research in accordance with existing ethical principles and regulations can be found in the literature. In the first approach, QSI research is viewed as distinct from other types of health care research and does not require regulation. In the second approach, QSI research falls within regulatory guidelines but is exempt from research ethics committee review. In the third approach, QSI research is deemed to be part of the learning health care system and, as such, is subject to a different set of ethical principles entirely. In this paper we critically assess each of these views.Conclusion: While none of these approaches is entirely satisfactory, we argue that use of the ethical principles governing research provides the best means of addressing the numerous questions posed by QSI research.

AB - Background: Quality and service improvement (QSI) research employs a broad range of methods to enhance the efficiency of health care delivery. QSI research differs from traditional health care research and poses unique ethical questions. Since QSI research aims to generate knowledge to enhance quality improvement efforts, should it be considered research for regulatory purposes? Is review by a research ethics committee required? Should health care providers be considered research participants? If participation in QSI research entails no more than minimal risk, is consent required? The lack of consensus on answers to these questions highlights the need for ethical guidance.Main Body: Three distinct approaches to classifying QSI research in accordance with existing ethical principles and regulations can be found in the literature. In the first approach, QSI research is viewed as distinct from other types of health care research and does not require regulation. In the second approach, QSI research falls within regulatory guidelines but is exempt from research ethics committee review. In the third approach, QSI research is deemed to be part of the learning health care system and, as such, is subject to a different set of ethical principles entirely. In this paper we critically assess each of these views.Conclusion: While none of these approaches is entirely satisfactory, we argue that use of the ethical principles governing research provides the best means of addressing the numerous questions posed by QSI research.

KW - quality and service improvement research

KW - ethics

KW - informed consent

KW - regulation

KW - research ethics committees

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2

DO - 10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

M1 - 334

ER -