Accuracy of gonadosomatic index in maturity classification and estimation of maturity ogive

Andres Flores (Corresponding Author), Rodrigo Wiff, Konstantinos Ganias, C. Tara Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Determination of the stage of sexual maturation of an individual fish is commonly assessed using either microscopic or macroscopic staging. Microscopic staging examines either the internal cellular structure (histology) or the external appearance of the whole-oocyte (whole mount). Macroscopic staging is the visual evaluation of the external gonad development according to a standardised reference scale. Histology is the most widely used microscopic method and highly accurate but expensive and time consuming because it requires specialised equipment. Macroscopic staging is cheaper and faster but is associated with higher degree of error and bias. This study describe a methodological approach to assessing maturity stages of individual fish that is both inexpensive, rapid and more accurate than macroscopic staging. We have named it the gonometric method because it is based on direct measurements of the gonodasomatic index (GSI), which expresses gonad weight as a proportion of total or somatic weight. Immature, mature-active, and mature-inactive fish were classified using a logistic multinomial model giving a threshold value of GSI named here as GSI(cut-off). The gonometric method was applied to four fish species that had different reproductive strategies, including demersal and pelagic species. For all four species the gonometric method estimated the maturity ogives with comparable precision to microscopic methods (p > 0.05). Across species, GSI(cut-off) values correlate with growth parameter of the von Bertalanffy growth function and length at 50% maturity, suggesting that the scaling of the GSI(cut-off) value is underpinned by fundamental allometric principles. Further testing of the gonometric method is required, but our results suggest that it has considerable potential for providing a faster and more accurate alternative to maturity staging without the need for extensive training requirements to ensure consistency across individual observers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-62
Number of pages13
JournalFisheries Research
Volume210
Early online date19 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Reproduction
  • Allometry
  • Gonadosomatic index
  • Maturity staging
  • Logistic multinomial model
  • HERRING CLUPEA-HARENGUS
  • COD GADUS-MORHUA
  • SOMATIC GROWTH
  • TRADE-OFF
  • FECUNDITY
  • FISHES
  • MATURATION
  • SARDINE
  • L.
  • IDENTIFICATION

Cite this

Accuracy of gonadosomatic index in maturity classification and estimation of maturity ogive. / Flores, Andres (Corresponding Author); Wiff, Rodrigo; Ganias, Konstantinos; Marshall, C. Tara.

In: Fisheries Research, Vol. 210, 28.02.2019, p. 50-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flores, Andres ; Wiff, Rodrigo ; Ganias, Konstantinos ; Marshall, C. Tara. / Accuracy of gonadosomatic index in maturity classification and estimation of maturity ogive. In: Fisheries Research. 2019 ; Vol. 210. pp. 50-62.
@article{f430592d032840daba7320ea59cfe292,
title = "Accuracy of gonadosomatic index in maturity classification and estimation of maturity ogive",
abstract = "Determination of the stage of sexual maturation of an individual fish is commonly assessed using either microscopic or macroscopic staging. Microscopic staging examines either the internal cellular structure (histology) or the external appearance of the whole-oocyte (whole mount). Macroscopic staging is the visual evaluation of the external gonad development according to a standardised reference scale. Histology is the most widely used microscopic method and highly accurate but expensive and time consuming because it requires specialised equipment. Macroscopic staging is cheaper and faster but is associated with higher degree of error and bias. This study describe a methodological approach to assessing maturity stages of individual fish that is both inexpensive, rapid and more accurate than macroscopic staging. We have named it the gonometric method because it is based on direct measurements of the gonodasomatic index (GSI), which expresses gonad weight as a proportion of total or somatic weight. Immature, mature-active, and mature-inactive fish were classified using a logistic multinomial model giving a threshold value of GSI named here as GSI(cut-off). The gonometric method was applied to four fish species that had different reproductive strategies, including demersal and pelagic species. For all four species the gonometric method estimated the maturity ogives with comparable precision to microscopic methods (p > 0.05). Across species, GSI(cut-off) values correlate with growth parameter of the von Bertalanffy growth function and length at 50{\%} maturity, suggesting that the scaling of the GSI(cut-off) value is underpinned by fundamental allometric principles. Further testing of the gonometric method is required, but our results suggest that it has considerable potential for providing a faster and more accurate alternative to maturity staging without the need for extensive training requirements to ensure consistency across individual observers.",
keywords = "Reproduction, Allometry, Gonadosomatic index, Maturity staging, Logistic multinomial model, HERRING CLUPEA-HARENGUS, COD GADUS-MORHUA, SOMATIC GROWTH, TRADE-OFF, FECUNDITY, FISHES, MATURATION, SARDINE, L., IDENTIFICATION",
author = "Andres Flores and Rodrigo Wiff and Konstantinos Ganias and Marshall, {C. Tara}",
note = "This study was funded by Fondo de Investigaci{\'o}n Pesquera (FIP-Chile) project numbers FIP 2000-14, FIP 2009-11, and 2010-08 conducted by the Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, IFOP-Chile. R. Wiff was funded by CAPES project FONDECYT No. FB0002 (2014). We are sincerely grateful to Dr. Olav S. Kjesbu, Professor Andre E. Punt, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments and suggestions that greatly improved an early version of this manuscript. We are also grateful to the on-board scientific observers and technicians from IFOP-Chile, whose contribution to the scientific work is crucial.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.009",
language = "English",
volume = "210",
pages = "50--62",
journal = "Fisheries Research",
issn = "0165-7836",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B. V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of gonadosomatic index in maturity classification and estimation of maturity ogive

AU - Flores, Andres

AU - Wiff, Rodrigo

AU - Ganias, Konstantinos

AU - Marshall, C. Tara

N1 - This study was funded by Fondo de Investigación Pesquera (FIP-Chile) project numbers FIP 2000-14, FIP 2009-11, and 2010-08 conducted by the Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, IFOP-Chile. R. Wiff was funded by CAPES project FONDECYT No. FB0002 (2014). We are sincerely grateful to Dr. Olav S. Kjesbu, Professor Andre E. Punt, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments and suggestions that greatly improved an early version of this manuscript. We are also grateful to the on-board scientific observers and technicians from IFOP-Chile, whose contribution to the scientific work is crucial.

PY - 2019/2/28

Y1 - 2019/2/28

N2 - Determination of the stage of sexual maturation of an individual fish is commonly assessed using either microscopic or macroscopic staging. Microscopic staging examines either the internal cellular structure (histology) or the external appearance of the whole-oocyte (whole mount). Macroscopic staging is the visual evaluation of the external gonad development according to a standardised reference scale. Histology is the most widely used microscopic method and highly accurate but expensive and time consuming because it requires specialised equipment. Macroscopic staging is cheaper and faster but is associated with higher degree of error and bias. This study describe a methodological approach to assessing maturity stages of individual fish that is both inexpensive, rapid and more accurate than macroscopic staging. We have named it the gonometric method because it is based on direct measurements of the gonodasomatic index (GSI), which expresses gonad weight as a proportion of total or somatic weight. Immature, mature-active, and mature-inactive fish were classified using a logistic multinomial model giving a threshold value of GSI named here as GSI(cut-off). The gonometric method was applied to four fish species that had different reproductive strategies, including demersal and pelagic species. For all four species the gonometric method estimated the maturity ogives with comparable precision to microscopic methods (p > 0.05). Across species, GSI(cut-off) values correlate with growth parameter of the von Bertalanffy growth function and length at 50% maturity, suggesting that the scaling of the GSI(cut-off) value is underpinned by fundamental allometric principles. Further testing of the gonometric method is required, but our results suggest that it has considerable potential for providing a faster and more accurate alternative to maturity staging without the need for extensive training requirements to ensure consistency across individual observers.

AB - Determination of the stage of sexual maturation of an individual fish is commonly assessed using either microscopic or macroscopic staging. Microscopic staging examines either the internal cellular structure (histology) or the external appearance of the whole-oocyte (whole mount). Macroscopic staging is the visual evaluation of the external gonad development according to a standardised reference scale. Histology is the most widely used microscopic method and highly accurate but expensive and time consuming because it requires specialised equipment. Macroscopic staging is cheaper and faster but is associated with higher degree of error and bias. This study describe a methodological approach to assessing maturity stages of individual fish that is both inexpensive, rapid and more accurate than macroscopic staging. We have named it the gonometric method because it is based on direct measurements of the gonodasomatic index (GSI), which expresses gonad weight as a proportion of total or somatic weight. Immature, mature-active, and mature-inactive fish were classified using a logistic multinomial model giving a threshold value of GSI named here as GSI(cut-off). The gonometric method was applied to four fish species that had different reproductive strategies, including demersal and pelagic species. For all four species the gonometric method estimated the maturity ogives with comparable precision to microscopic methods (p > 0.05). Across species, GSI(cut-off) values correlate with growth parameter of the von Bertalanffy growth function and length at 50% maturity, suggesting that the scaling of the GSI(cut-off) value is underpinned by fundamental allometric principles. Further testing of the gonometric method is required, but our results suggest that it has considerable potential for providing a faster and more accurate alternative to maturity staging without the need for extensive training requirements to ensure consistency across individual observers.

KW - Reproduction

KW - Allometry

KW - Gonadosomatic index

KW - Maturity staging

KW - Logistic multinomial model

KW - HERRING CLUPEA-HARENGUS

KW - COD GADUS-MORHUA

KW - SOMATIC GROWTH

KW - TRADE-OFF

KW - FECUNDITY

KW - FISHES

KW - MATURATION

KW - SARDINE

KW - L.

KW - IDENTIFICATION

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/accuracy-gonadosomatic-index-maturity-classification-estimation-maturity-ogive

U2 - 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.009

M3 - Article

VL - 210

SP - 50

EP - 62

JO - Fisheries Research

JF - Fisheries Research

SN - 0165-7836

ER -