Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain

a randomized controlled trial

Ruth E. Johnson, Gareth T. Jones, Nicola J. Wiles, Carol Chaddock, Richard G. Potter, Chris Roberts, Deborah P. M. Symmons, Paul J. Watson, David J. Torgerson, Gary J. Macfarlane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To determine 1) whether, among patients with persistent disabling low back pain (LBP), a group program of exercise and education using a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach, reduces pain and disability over a subsequent 12-month period; 2) the cost-effectiveness of the intervention; and 3) whether a priori preference for type of treatment influences outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is evidence that both exercise and CBT delivered in specialist settings is effective in improving LBP. There is a lack of evidence on whether such interventions, delivered by trained individuals in primary care, result in improved outcomes. METHODS: The study was conducted in nine family medical practices in East Cheshire, UK. Patients 18 to 65 years of age, consulting with LBP, were recruited; those still reporting LBP 3 months after the initial consultation were randomized between the two trial arms. The intervention arm received a program of eight 2-hour group exercise session over 6 weeks comprising active exercise and education delivered by physiotherapists using a CBT approach. Both arms received an educational booklet and audio-cassette. The primary outcome measures were pain (0-100 Visual Analogue Scale) and disability (Roland and Morris Disability Scale; score 0-24). RESULTS: A total of 196 subjects (84%) completed follow-up 12 months after the completion of the intervention program. The intervention showed only a small and nonsignificant effect at reducing pain (-3.6 mm; 95% confidence interval, -8.5, 1.2 mm) and disability (-0.6 score; 95% confidence interval, -1.6, 0.4). The cost of the intervention was low with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pound5000 (U.S. $8650) per quality adjusted life year. In addition, patients allocated to the intervention that had expressed a preference for it had clinically important reductions in pain and disability. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention program produces only modest effects in reducing LBP and disability over a 1-year period. The observation that patient preference for treatment influences outcome warrants further investigation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1578-1585
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume32
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2007

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Attitude to Health
  • Cognitive Therapy
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Low Back Pain
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Physical Fitness
  • Treatment Outcome

Cite this

Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain : a randomized controlled trial. / Johnson, Ruth E.; Jones, Gareth T.; Wiles, Nicola J.; Chaddock, Carol; Potter, Richard G.; Roberts, Chris; Symmons, Deborah P. M.; Watson, Paul J.; Torgerson, David J.; Macfarlane, Gary J.

In: Spine, Vol. 32, No. 15, 01.07.2007, p. 1578-1585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, RE, Jones, GT, Wiles, NJ, Chaddock, C, Potter, RG, Roberts, C, Symmons, DPM, Watson, PJ, Torgerson, DJ & Macfarlane, GJ 2007, 'Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain: a randomized controlled trial', Spine, vol. 32, no. 15, pp. 1578-1585. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074f890
Johnson, Ruth E. ; Jones, Gareth T. ; Wiles, Nicola J. ; Chaddock, Carol ; Potter, Richard G. ; Roberts, Chris ; Symmons, Deborah P. M. ; Watson, Paul J. ; Torgerson, David J. ; Macfarlane, Gary J. / Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain : a randomized controlled trial. In: Spine. 2007 ; Vol. 32, No. 15. pp. 1578-1585.
@article{f6fc8fdbdc3e49bfaa860c51441a5b5a,
title = "Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain: a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To determine 1) whether, among patients with persistent disabling low back pain (LBP), a group program of exercise and education using a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach, reduces pain and disability over a subsequent 12-month period; 2) the cost-effectiveness of the intervention; and 3) whether a priori preference for type of treatment influences outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is evidence that both exercise and CBT delivered in specialist settings is effective in improving LBP. There is a lack of evidence on whether such interventions, delivered by trained individuals in primary care, result in improved outcomes. METHODS: The study was conducted in nine family medical practices in East Cheshire, UK. Patients 18 to 65 years of age, consulting with LBP, were recruited; those still reporting LBP 3 months after the initial consultation were randomized between the two trial arms. The intervention arm received a program of eight 2-hour group exercise session over 6 weeks comprising active exercise and education delivered by physiotherapists using a CBT approach. Both arms received an educational booklet and audio-cassette. The primary outcome measures were pain (0-100 Visual Analogue Scale) and disability (Roland and Morris Disability Scale; score 0-24). RESULTS: A total of 196 subjects (84{\%}) completed follow-up 12 months after the completion of the intervention program. The intervention showed only a small and nonsignificant effect at reducing pain (-3.6 mm; 95{\%} confidence interval, -8.5, 1.2 mm) and disability (-0.6 score; 95{\%} confidence interval, -1.6, 0.4). The cost of the intervention was low with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pound5000 (U.S. $8650) per quality adjusted life year. In addition, patients allocated to the intervention that had expressed a preference for it had clinically important reductions in pain and disability. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention program produces only modest effects in reducing LBP and disability over a 1-year period. The observation that patient preference for treatment influences outcome warrants further investigation.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Cognitive Therapy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Low Back Pain, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Satisfaction, Physical Fitness, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Johnson, {Ruth E.} and Jones, {Gareth T.} and Wiles, {Nicola J.} and Carol Chaddock and Potter, {Richard G.} and Chris Roberts and Symmons, {Deborah P. M.} and Watson, {Paul J.} and Torgerson, {David J.} and Macfarlane, {Gary J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074f890",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1578--1585",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain

T2 - a randomized controlled trial

AU - Johnson, Ruth E.

AU - Jones, Gareth T.

AU - Wiles, Nicola J.

AU - Chaddock, Carol

AU - Potter, Richard G.

AU - Roberts, Chris

AU - Symmons, Deborah P. M.

AU - Watson, Paul J.

AU - Torgerson, David J.

AU - Macfarlane, Gary J.

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To determine 1) whether, among patients with persistent disabling low back pain (LBP), a group program of exercise and education using a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach, reduces pain and disability over a subsequent 12-month period; 2) the cost-effectiveness of the intervention; and 3) whether a priori preference for type of treatment influences outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is evidence that both exercise and CBT delivered in specialist settings is effective in improving LBP. There is a lack of evidence on whether such interventions, delivered by trained individuals in primary care, result in improved outcomes. METHODS: The study was conducted in nine family medical practices in East Cheshire, UK. Patients 18 to 65 years of age, consulting with LBP, were recruited; those still reporting LBP 3 months after the initial consultation were randomized between the two trial arms. The intervention arm received a program of eight 2-hour group exercise session over 6 weeks comprising active exercise and education delivered by physiotherapists using a CBT approach. Both arms received an educational booklet and audio-cassette. The primary outcome measures were pain (0-100 Visual Analogue Scale) and disability (Roland and Morris Disability Scale; score 0-24). RESULTS: A total of 196 subjects (84%) completed follow-up 12 months after the completion of the intervention program. The intervention showed only a small and nonsignificant effect at reducing pain (-3.6 mm; 95% confidence interval, -8.5, 1.2 mm) and disability (-0.6 score; 95% confidence interval, -1.6, 0.4). The cost of the intervention was low with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pound5000 (U.S. $8650) per quality adjusted life year. In addition, patients allocated to the intervention that had expressed a preference for it had clinically important reductions in pain and disability. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention program produces only modest effects in reducing LBP and disability over a 1-year period. The observation that patient preference for treatment influences outcome warrants further investigation.

AB - STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To determine 1) whether, among patients with persistent disabling low back pain (LBP), a group program of exercise and education using a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach, reduces pain and disability over a subsequent 12-month period; 2) the cost-effectiveness of the intervention; and 3) whether a priori preference for type of treatment influences outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is evidence that both exercise and CBT delivered in specialist settings is effective in improving LBP. There is a lack of evidence on whether such interventions, delivered by trained individuals in primary care, result in improved outcomes. METHODS: The study was conducted in nine family medical practices in East Cheshire, UK. Patients 18 to 65 years of age, consulting with LBP, were recruited; those still reporting LBP 3 months after the initial consultation were randomized between the two trial arms. The intervention arm received a program of eight 2-hour group exercise session over 6 weeks comprising active exercise and education delivered by physiotherapists using a CBT approach. Both arms received an educational booklet and audio-cassette. The primary outcome measures were pain (0-100 Visual Analogue Scale) and disability (Roland and Morris Disability Scale; score 0-24). RESULTS: A total of 196 subjects (84%) completed follow-up 12 months after the completion of the intervention program. The intervention showed only a small and nonsignificant effect at reducing pain (-3.6 mm; 95% confidence interval, -8.5, 1.2 mm) and disability (-0.6 score; 95% confidence interval, -1.6, 0.4). The cost of the intervention was low with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pound5000 (U.S. $8650) per quality adjusted life year. In addition, patients allocated to the intervention that had expressed a preference for it had clinically important reductions in pain and disability. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention program produces only modest effects in reducing LBP and disability over a 1-year period. The observation that patient preference for treatment influences outcome warrants further investigation.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Attitude to Health

KW - Cognitive Therapy

KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis

KW - Exercise Therapy

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Low Back Pain

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Patient Education as Topic

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Physical Fitness

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074f890

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074f890

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1578

EP - 1585

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 15

ER -