Advancing human health risk assessment

Anna Lanzoni (Corresponding Author), Anna F. Castoldi, George E.N. Kass, Andrea Terron, Guilhem De Seze, Anna Bal-Price, Frédéric Y. Bois, K. Barry Delclos, Daniel R. Doerge, Ellen Fritsche, Thorhallur Halldorsson, Marike Kolossa-Gehring, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Frits Koning, Alfonso Lampen, Marcel Leist, Ellen Mantus, Christophe Rousselle, Michael Siegrist, Pablo Steinberg & 7 others Angelika Tritscher, Bob Van de Water, Paolo Vineis, Nigel Walker, Heather Wallace, Maurice Whelan, Maged Younes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and does not necessarily provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. From an ethical and scientific viewpoint, a paradigm shift is required to deliver testing strategies that enable reliable, animal‐free hazard and risk assessments, which are based on a mechanistic understanding of chemical toxicity and make use of exposure science and epidemiological data. This shift will require a new philosophy, new data, multidisciplinary expertise and more flexible regulations. Re‐engineering of available data is also deemed necessary as data should be accessible, readable, interpretable and usable. Dedicated training to build the capacity in terms of expertise is necessary, together with practical resources allocated to education. The dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, academia and stakeholders should be promoted further to understand scientific and societal needs. Genuine interest in taking risk assessment forward should drive the change and should be supported by flexible funding. This publication builds upon presentations made and discussions held during the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018).
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere170712
Number of pages21
JournalEFSA Journal
Volume17
Issue numberS1
Early online date8 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019
EventEFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ - Parma, Italy
Duration: 18 Sep 201821 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

risk assessment
human health
Health
risk assessors
risk managers
toxicity
Food Technology
funding
food science
reproducibility
stakeholders
Italy
education
Education
animals
testing

Keywords

  • alternative methods
  • exposure
  • epidemiology
  • food safety
  • mechanistic studies
  • risk assessment

Cite this

Lanzoni, A., Castoldi, A. F., Kass, G. E. N., Terron, A., De Seze, G., Bal-Price, A., ... Younes, M. (2019). Advancing human health risk assessment. EFSA Journal, 17(S1), [e170712]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712

Advancing human health risk assessment. / Lanzoni, Anna (Corresponding Author); Castoldi, Anna F.; Kass, George E.N.; Terron, Andrea; De Seze, Guilhem; Bal-Price, Anna; Bois, Frédéric Y.; Delclos, K. Barry; Doerge, Daniel R.; Fritsche, Ellen; Halldorsson, Thorhallur; Kolossa-Gehring, Marike; Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne; Koning, Frits; Lampen, Alfonso; Leist, Marcel; Mantus, Ellen; Rousselle, Christophe; Siegrist, Michael; Steinberg, Pablo; Tritscher, Angelika; Van de Water, Bob; Vineis, Paolo; Walker, Nigel; Wallace, Heather; Whelan, Maurice; Younes, Maged.

In: EFSA Journal, Vol. 17, No. S1, e170712, 07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lanzoni, A, Castoldi, AF, Kass, GEN, Terron, A, De Seze, G, Bal-Price, A, Bois, FY, Delclos, KB, Doerge, DR, Fritsche, E, Halldorsson, T, Kolossa-Gehring, M, Hougaard Bennekou, S, Koning, F, Lampen, A, Leist, M, Mantus, E, Rousselle, C, Siegrist, M, Steinberg, P, Tritscher, A, Van de Water, B, Vineis, P, Walker, N, Wallace, H, Whelan, M & Younes, M 2019, 'Advancing human health risk assessment' EFSA Journal, vol. 17, no. S1, e170712. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712
Lanzoni A, Castoldi AF, Kass GEN, Terron A, De Seze G, Bal-Price A et al. Advancing human health risk assessment. EFSA Journal. 2019 Jul;17(S1). e170712. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712
Lanzoni, Anna ; Castoldi, Anna F. ; Kass, George E.N. ; Terron, Andrea ; De Seze, Guilhem ; Bal-Price, Anna ; Bois, Frédéric Y. ; Delclos, K. Barry ; Doerge, Daniel R. ; Fritsche, Ellen ; Halldorsson, Thorhallur ; Kolossa-Gehring, Marike ; Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne ; Koning, Frits ; Lampen, Alfonso ; Leist, Marcel ; Mantus, Ellen ; Rousselle, Christophe ; Siegrist, Michael ; Steinberg, Pablo ; Tritscher, Angelika ; Van de Water, Bob ; Vineis, Paolo ; Walker, Nigel ; Wallace, Heather ; Whelan, Maurice ; Younes, Maged. / Advancing human health risk assessment. In: EFSA Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. S1.
@article{e36f456132744fe982abf188003fd05b,
title = "Advancing human health risk assessment",
abstract = "The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and does not necessarily provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. From an ethical and scientific viewpoint, a paradigm shift is required to deliver testing strategies that enable reliable, animal‐free hazard and risk assessments, which are based on a mechanistic understanding of chemical toxicity and make use of exposure science and epidemiological data. This shift will require a new philosophy, new data, multidisciplinary expertise and more flexible regulations. Re‐engineering of available data is also deemed necessary as data should be accessible, readable, interpretable and usable. Dedicated training to build the capacity in terms of expertise is necessary, together with practical resources allocated to education. The dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, academia and stakeholders should be promoted further to understand scientific and societal needs. Genuine interest in taking risk assessment forward should drive the change and should be supported by flexible funding. This publication builds upon presentations made and discussions held during the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018).",
keywords = "alternative methods, exposure, epidemiology, food safety, mechanistic studies, risk assessment",
author = "Anna Lanzoni and Castoldi, {Anna F.} and Kass, {George E.N.} and Andrea Terron and {De Seze}, Guilhem and Anna Bal-Price and Bois, {Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Y.} and Delclos, {K. Barry} and Doerge, {Daniel R.} and Ellen Fritsche and Thorhallur Halldorsson and Marike Kolossa-Gehring and {Hougaard Bennekou}, Susanne and Frits Koning and Alfonso Lampen and Marcel Leist and Ellen Mantus and Christophe Rousselle and Michael Siegrist and Pablo Steinberg and Angelika Tritscher and {Van de Water}, Bob and Paolo Vineis and Nigel Walker and Heather Wallace and Maurice Whelan and Maged Younes",
note = "Acknowledgements: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and authors wish to thank the participants of the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018) for their active and valuable contributions to the discussion. We also thank Hans Verhagen for carefully proofreading it.",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "EFSA Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing human health risk assessment

AU - Lanzoni, Anna

AU - Castoldi, Anna F.

AU - Kass, George E.N.

AU - Terron, Andrea

AU - De Seze, Guilhem

AU - Bal-Price, Anna

AU - Bois, Frédéric Y.

AU - Delclos, K. Barry

AU - Doerge, Daniel R.

AU - Fritsche, Ellen

AU - Halldorsson, Thorhallur

AU - Kolossa-Gehring, Marike

AU - Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne

AU - Koning, Frits

AU - Lampen, Alfonso

AU - Leist, Marcel

AU - Mantus, Ellen

AU - Rousselle, Christophe

AU - Siegrist, Michael

AU - Steinberg, Pablo

AU - Tritscher, Angelika

AU - Van de Water, Bob

AU - Vineis, Paolo

AU - Walker, Nigel

AU - Wallace, Heather

AU - Whelan, Maurice

AU - Younes, Maged

N1 - Acknowledgements: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and authors wish to thank the participants of the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018) for their active and valuable contributions to the discussion. We also thank Hans Verhagen for carefully proofreading it.

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and does not necessarily provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. From an ethical and scientific viewpoint, a paradigm shift is required to deliver testing strategies that enable reliable, animal‐free hazard and risk assessments, which are based on a mechanistic understanding of chemical toxicity and make use of exposure science and epidemiological data. This shift will require a new philosophy, new data, multidisciplinary expertise and more flexible regulations. Re‐engineering of available data is also deemed necessary as data should be accessible, readable, interpretable and usable. Dedicated training to build the capacity in terms of expertise is necessary, together with practical resources allocated to education. The dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, academia and stakeholders should be promoted further to understand scientific and societal needs. Genuine interest in taking risk assessment forward should drive the change and should be supported by flexible funding. This publication builds upon presentations made and discussions held during the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018).

AB - The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and does not necessarily provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. From an ethical and scientific viewpoint, a paradigm shift is required to deliver testing strategies that enable reliable, animal‐free hazard and risk assessments, which are based on a mechanistic understanding of chemical toxicity and make use of exposure science and epidemiological data. This shift will require a new philosophy, new data, multidisciplinary expertise and more flexible regulations. Re‐engineering of available data is also deemed necessary as data should be accessible, readable, interpretable and usable. Dedicated training to build the capacity in terms of expertise is necessary, together with practical resources allocated to education. The dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, academia and stakeholders should be promoted further to understand scientific and societal needs. Genuine interest in taking risk assessment forward should drive the change and should be supported by flexible funding. This publication builds upon presentations made and discussions held during the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018).

KW - alternative methods

KW - exposure

KW - epidemiology

KW - food safety

KW - mechanistic studies

KW - risk assessment

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - EFSA Journal

JF - EFSA Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - S1

M1 - e170712

ER -