Advising patients about patient safety

current initiatives risk shifting responsibility.

V.A. Entwistle, M.M. Mello, T.A. Brennan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many health care providers now disseminate advisories telling patients what they can do to avoid errors and harms in their care. METHODS: The content of five leading safety advisories for patients was analyzed and a critique of their development, content, and impact was developed, drawing on published literature and 40 interviews with a diverse sample of 50 key informants. FINDINGS: Very little is known about the effects of the distribution of safety advisories to patients, but several grounds for concern were identified. There was a lack of attention to patients' perspectives during the development of advisory messages, and the advisories say little about what health care providers should do to ensure patient safety. Patients are given little practical support to carry out the recommended actions, and health professionals' responses may render their attempts to act to secure their own safety ineffective. Some messages suggest an inappropriate shifting of responsibility onto patients. Advice that involves checking on or challenging health professionals' actions appears to be particularly problematic for patients. Such behaviors conflict with the expectations many people have--and think health professionals have--of patients' roles. DISCUSSION: A serious commitment to optimizing patients' contributions to safe care requires a research-based understanding of patients' perspectives and more practical facilitation of patient involvement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-494
Number of pages12
JournalJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources.
Volume31
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2005

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Health Personnel
Health
Safety
Patient Participation
Interviews
Research

Cite this

Advising patients about patient safety : current initiatives risk shifting responsibility. / Entwistle, V.A.; Mello, M.M.; Brennan, T.A.

In: Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources., Vol. 31, No. 9, 01.09.2005, p. 483-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{defee2d57f164bdb9169158d9b3d3278,
title = "Advising patients about patient safety: current initiatives risk shifting responsibility.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Many health care providers now disseminate advisories telling patients what they can do to avoid errors and harms in their care. METHODS: The content of five leading safety advisories for patients was analyzed and a critique of their development, content, and impact was developed, drawing on published literature and 40 interviews with a diverse sample of 50 key informants. FINDINGS: Very little is known about the effects of the distribution of safety advisories to patients, but several grounds for concern were identified. There was a lack of attention to patients' perspectives during the development of advisory messages, and the advisories say little about what health care providers should do to ensure patient safety. Patients are given little practical support to carry out the recommended actions, and health professionals' responses may render their attempts to act to secure their own safety ineffective. Some messages suggest an inappropriate shifting of responsibility onto patients. Advice that involves checking on or challenging health professionals' actions appears to be particularly problematic for patients. Such behaviors conflict with the expectations many people have--and think health professionals have--of patients' roles. DISCUSSION: A serious commitment to optimizing patients' contributions to safe care requires a research-based understanding of patients' perspectives and more practical facilitation of patient involvement.",
author = "V.A. Entwistle and M.M. Mello and T.A. Brennan",
note = "MEDLINE{\circledR} is the source for the citation and abstract of this record.",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "483--494",
journal = "Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources.",
issn = "1553-7250",
publisher = "Joint Commission Resources, Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advising patients about patient safety

T2 - current initiatives risk shifting responsibility.

AU - Entwistle, V.A.

AU - Mello, M.M.

AU - Brennan, T.A.

N1 - MEDLINE® is the source for the citation and abstract of this record.

PY - 2005/9/1

Y1 - 2005/9/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Many health care providers now disseminate advisories telling patients what they can do to avoid errors and harms in their care. METHODS: The content of five leading safety advisories for patients was analyzed and a critique of their development, content, and impact was developed, drawing on published literature and 40 interviews with a diverse sample of 50 key informants. FINDINGS: Very little is known about the effects of the distribution of safety advisories to patients, but several grounds for concern were identified. There was a lack of attention to patients' perspectives during the development of advisory messages, and the advisories say little about what health care providers should do to ensure patient safety. Patients are given little practical support to carry out the recommended actions, and health professionals' responses may render their attempts to act to secure their own safety ineffective. Some messages suggest an inappropriate shifting of responsibility onto patients. Advice that involves checking on or challenging health professionals' actions appears to be particularly problematic for patients. Such behaviors conflict with the expectations many people have--and think health professionals have--of patients' roles. DISCUSSION: A serious commitment to optimizing patients' contributions to safe care requires a research-based understanding of patients' perspectives and more practical facilitation of patient involvement.

AB - BACKGROUND: Many health care providers now disseminate advisories telling patients what they can do to avoid errors and harms in their care. METHODS: The content of five leading safety advisories for patients was analyzed and a critique of their development, content, and impact was developed, drawing on published literature and 40 interviews with a diverse sample of 50 key informants. FINDINGS: Very little is known about the effects of the distribution of safety advisories to patients, but several grounds for concern were identified. There was a lack of attention to patients' perspectives during the development of advisory messages, and the advisories say little about what health care providers should do to ensure patient safety. Patients are given little practical support to carry out the recommended actions, and health professionals' responses may render their attempts to act to secure their own safety ineffective. Some messages suggest an inappropriate shifting of responsibility onto patients. Advice that involves checking on or challenging health professionals' actions appears to be particularly problematic for patients. Such behaviors conflict with the expectations many people have--and think health professionals have--of patients' roles. DISCUSSION: A serious commitment to optimizing patients' contributions to safe care requires a research-based understanding of patients' perspectives and more practical facilitation of patient involvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644696226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 483

EP - 494

JO - Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources.

JF - Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources.

SN - 1553-7250

IS - 9

ER -