Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management

Katrin Prager*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, landscape and its management has become a focus of policies and academic conceptualisation. Landscape is understood as a concept of interconnected natural and human systems. Its management must take into account the dynamic interdependencies and diverging interests of various stakeholders at different levels. Bridging organisations can provide an arena for trust-building, conflict resolution, learning and collaboration between relevant stakeholders. This paper draws on two strands of literature - landscape governance and co-management of social-ecological systems - to investigate the contributions of agri-environmental collaboratives (AEC) to sustainable landscape management. Based on data from 41 interviews with key informants and AEC members in Germany and the Netherlands, six fields of contributions were identified: policy implementation and service provision; coordination and mediation; awareness raising and behaviour change; care for 'everyday' landscapes; maintenance and protection of landscapes (including species and habitats); and income generation and economic benefits. Some of the contributions evolve around the specific role of AEC as bridging organisations, but other contributions such as economic benefits emerge beyond this analytical lens. The paper therefore emphasises holistic, bottom up assessment of AEC contributions and argues that governments should support such organisations through i) funding for facilitators and ii) funding for impact monitoring and data management. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-384
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume161
Early online date20 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sep 2015

Keywords

  • Collaborative management
  • Bottom-up sustainability assessment
  • Collective action
  • Boundary organisation
  • Intermediary
  • Europe
  • SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
  • BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS
  • ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT
  • POLICY
  • COOPERATIVES
  • GOVERNANCE
  • PARTICIPATION
  • CONSERVATION
  • INFORMATION
  • FRAMEWORK

Cite this

Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management. / Prager, Katrin.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 161, 15.09.2015, p. 375-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41835a8c1c4647569406162bb042d3a3,
title = "Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management",
abstract = "In recent years, landscape and its management has become a focus of policies and academic conceptualisation. Landscape is understood as a concept of interconnected natural and human systems. Its management must take into account the dynamic interdependencies and diverging interests of various stakeholders at different levels. Bridging organisations can provide an arena for trust-building, conflict resolution, learning and collaboration between relevant stakeholders. This paper draws on two strands of literature - landscape governance and co-management of social-ecological systems - to investigate the contributions of agri-environmental collaboratives (AEC) to sustainable landscape management. Based on data from 41 interviews with key informants and AEC members in Germany and the Netherlands, six fields of contributions were identified: policy implementation and service provision; coordination and mediation; awareness raising and behaviour change; care for 'everyday' landscapes; maintenance and protection of landscapes (including species and habitats); and income generation and economic benefits. Some of the contributions evolve around the specific role of AEC as bridging organisations, but other contributions such as economic benefits emerge beyond this analytical lens. The paper therefore emphasises holistic, bottom up assessment of AEC contributions and argues that governments should support such organisations through i) funding for facilitators and ii) funding for impact monitoring and data management. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Collaborative management, Bottom-up sustainability assessment, Collective action, Boundary organisation, Intermediary, Europe, SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS, ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT, POLICY, COOPERATIVES, GOVERNANCE, PARTICIPATION, CONSERVATION, INFORMATION, FRAMEWORK",
author = "Katrin Prager",
note = "This research was funded through a EU FP7 Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship grant number PIEF-GA-2009-253516.",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.027",
language = "English",
volume = "161",
pages = "375--384",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management

AU - Prager, Katrin

N1 - This research was funded through a EU FP7 Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship grant number PIEF-GA-2009-253516.

PY - 2015/9/15

Y1 - 2015/9/15

N2 - In recent years, landscape and its management has become a focus of policies and academic conceptualisation. Landscape is understood as a concept of interconnected natural and human systems. Its management must take into account the dynamic interdependencies and diverging interests of various stakeholders at different levels. Bridging organisations can provide an arena for trust-building, conflict resolution, learning and collaboration between relevant stakeholders. This paper draws on two strands of literature - landscape governance and co-management of social-ecological systems - to investigate the contributions of agri-environmental collaboratives (AEC) to sustainable landscape management. Based on data from 41 interviews with key informants and AEC members in Germany and the Netherlands, six fields of contributions were identified: policy implementation and service provision; coordination and mediation; awareness raising and behaviour change; care for 'everyday' landscapes; maintenance and protection of landscapes (including species and habitats); and income generation and economic benefits. Some of the contributions evolve around the specific role of AEC as bridging organisations, but other contributions such as economic benefits emerge beyond this analytical lens. The paper therefore emphasises holistic, bottom up assessment of AEC contributions and argues that governments should support such organisations through i) funding for facilitators and ii) funding for impact monitoring and data management. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - In recent years, landscape and its management has become a focus of policies and academic conceptualisation. Landscape is understood as a concept of interconnected natural and human systems. Its management must take into account the dynamic interdependencies and diverging interests of various stakeholders at different levels. Bridging organisations can provide an arena for trust-building, conflict resolution, learning and collaboration between relevant stakeholders. This paper draws on two strands of literature - landscape governance and co-management of social-ecological systems - to investigate the contributions of agri-environmental collaboratives (AEC) to sustainable landscape management. Based on data from 41 interviews with key informants and AEC members in Germany and the Netherlands, six fields of contributions were identified: policy implementation and service provision; coordination and mediation; awareness raising and behaviour change; care for 'everyday' landscapes; maintenance and protection of landscapes (including species and habitats); and income generation and economic benefits. Some of the contributions evolve around the specific role of AEC as bridging organisations, but other contributions such as economic benefits emerge beyond this analytical lens. The paper therefore emphasises holistic, bottom up assessment of AEC contributions and argues that governments should support such organisations through i) funding for facilitators and ii) funding for impact monitoring and data management. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Collaborative management

KW - Bottom-up sustainability assessment

KW - Collective action

KW - Boundary organisation

KW - Intermediary

KW - Europe

KW - SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS

KW - BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS

KW - ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT

KW - POLICY

KW - COOPERATIVES

KW - GOVERNANCE

KW - PARTICIPATION

KW - CONSERVATION

KW - INFORMATION

KW - FRAMEWORK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.027

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.027

M3 - Article

VL - 161

SP - 375

EP - 384

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -