Air pollution and business political influence in fifteen OECD countries

Patrick Bernhagen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper I examine the political influence of business in the context of environmental politics by comparing the explanatory role of three distinct sources of business power: political organization, a structurally privileged position in politics, and informational advantages. Using data on fifteen OECD countries between 1981 and 1999, the analysis shows that business organizational strength and information asymmetry in government – business relations are important determinants of observed differences in air pollution across countries and over time. By contrast, there is no support for the claim that the structural dominance of business constrains political efforts to improve air quality. By analyzing the role of asymmetric information and systems of interest intermediation simultaneously, the paper contributes to our understanding of the causal mechanisms that link corporatism to environmental performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362–380
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume30
Issue number2
Early online date1 Jan 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2012

Fingerprint

political influence
air pollution
OECD
atmospheric pollution
representation of interests
corporatism
politics
political power
asymmetry
air
determinants
organization
asymmetric information
environmental politics
political organization
performance
air quality
time

Keywords

  • environmental politics
  • air pollution
  • business political action
  • business organization
  • structural power
  • asymmetric information
  • corporatism

Cite this

Air pollution and business political influence in fifteen OECD countries. / Bernhagen, Patrick.

In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.04.2012, p. 362–380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12841e99138749b9a54463f3f0e6a6b0,
title = "Air pollution and business political influence in fifteen OECD countries",
abstract = "In this paper I examine the political influence of business in the context of environmental politics by comparing the explanatory role of three distinct sources of business power: political organization, a structurally privileged position in politics, and informational advantages. Using data on fifteen OECD countries between 1981 and 1999, the analysis shows that business organizational strength and information asymmetry in government – business relations are important determinants of observed differences in air pollution across countries and over time. By contrast, there is no support for the claim that the structural dominance of business constrains political efforts to improve air quality. By analyzing the role of asymmetric information and systems of interest intermediation simultaneously, the paper contributes to our understanding of the causal mechanisms that link corporatism to environmental performance.",
keywords = "environmental politics, air pollution, business political action, business organization, structural power, asymmetric information, corporatism",
author = "Patrick Bernhagen",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1068/c11179b",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "362–380",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",
issn = "0263-774X",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Air pollution and business political influence in fifteen OECD countries

AU - Bernhagen, Patrick

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - In this paper I examine the political influence of business in the context of environmental politics by comparing the explanatory role of three distinct sources of business power: political organization, a structurally privileged position in politics, and informational advantages. Using data on fifteen OECD countries between 1981 and 1999, the analysis shows that business organizational strength and information asymmetry in government – business relations are important determinants of observed differences in air pollution across countries and over time. By contrast, there is no support for the claim that the structural dominance of business constrains political efforts to improve air quality. By analyzing the role of asymmetric information and systems of interest intermediation simultaneously, the paper contributes to our understanding of the causal mechanisms that link corporatism to environmental performance.

AB - In this paper I examine the political influence of business in the context of environmental politics by comparing the explanatory role of three distinct sources of business power: political organization, a structurally privileged position in politics, and informational advantages. Using data on fifteen OECD countries between 1981 and 1999, the analysis shows that business organizational strength and information asymmetry in government – business relations are important determinants of observed differences in air pollution across countries and over time. By contrast, there is no support for the claim that the structural dominance of business constrains political efforts to improve air quality. By analyzing the role of asymmetric information and systems of interest intermediation simultaneously, the paper contributes to our understanding of the causal mechanisms that link corporatism to environmental performance.

KW - environmental politics

KW - air pollution

KW - business political action

KW - business organization

KW - structural power

KW - asymmetric information

KW - corporatism

U2 - 10.1068/c11179b

DO - 10.1068/c11179b

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 362

EP - 380

JO - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

JF - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

SN - 0263-774X

IS - 2

ER -